View source for Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions

{{Lesson
|ID=65
|Has statement=Involving local stakeholders in ranking the functions allowed to show them how their contribution can influence the management decisions.
|Has evidence=The public discussions called for a clarification of some concepts about which there were significant misunderstandings and preconceptions.
|Has consequences=Each stakeholder can accept that his own point of view is not always the best.
|Has recommendation for action=The different scenarios were presented to the stakeholders in a series of public meetings.
|Has domain=Knowledge management, Participation
|Has temporal scale=Long term (strategic), Medium term (tactical)
|Has spatial context=Spatial with no neighbourhood interrelations
|Has spatial scale=Stand level
|Has objectives dimension=Multiple objectives
|Has goods and services dimension=Market non-wood products, Market services, Market wood products, Non-market services
|Has decision making dimension=More than one decision maker/stakeholder
|Has related DSS=FORFUN
|Has country=Italy
|Has related case=Italy-Assessing forest functions at stand scale in a sub-regional forest plan in the Dolomites
|Has actor perspective=Facilitator, User
|Has working group theme=Participation, Knowledge management
|Has DSS development=Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions.Description of DSS development
|Has decision support techniques=Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions.Decision support techniques
|Has knowledge management processes=Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions.Knowledge management process
|Has support for social participation=Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions.Support of social participation
}}