View source for Case Study Committee Workplan

From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS

← Case Study Committee Workplan

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

---

You can view and copy the source of this page:

[[category:Case Studies]] [[category:Meeting Nov 2011]] <div style="float:right;">__TOC__</div> ==Timeline== * 18 November 2011 : FORSYS participants submit STSM opportunities to wiki * 10 February 2012 : Case study technical committee (CSTC) develops example cases * 1 April : CSTC provides reporting form for CS and solicits short cases from Forsys participants * 10 May (Zvolen meeting) : CSTC reports on progress and again requests submission of short cases * June - Aug : CSTC follow up on potential cases, answer any questions, provide feedback on drafts * 1 September : CTSC assesses potential for publication, solicits longer cases as needed, starts synthesis * 1 November : FORSYS participants submit publication drafts * 20 December 2012 : CSTC provides feedback on drafts * 1 February 2013 : Final cases submitted; CS synthesis informs development of FORSYS guidelines * April 2013 : Selected cases presented at Umea conference * (technically have until 3 months after end of project (4/2013) to complete all project work) ==Develop case study guidelines== * Figure out how cases will contribute to final Forsys guidelines * E-mail Forsys participants about important guidelines updates ==Manage case study contributions== * Develop semantic form for entering case studies into the wiki * Solicit case studies from the Forsys network * Review and comment on case studies submitted * Answer questions, resolve issues ===What do we do with the case study ideas we receive?=== * Cases with STSM opportunities should be entered on the wiki at http://fp0804.emu.ee/wiki/index.php/Category:STSM_Opportunity * For cases generally, the idea was to create a semantic form similar to what is being developed for the DSS, but this will take some time to develop. In the meantime, maybe we can just post them directly to the standard wiki. I added a subcategory to [[:Category:Case Studies]] that is [[:Category:Forsys Case Studies]] (but this is just a temporary strategy). It may be important to somehow separate cases that Forsys participants plan to use to contribute towards the project guidelines from general cases in the literature, but we are not sure exactly how yet - see Forsys vs Literature question. ===How to we tag/categorize the cases?=== * It seems to me that tags need to be smaller than “Cases of participatory planning in forestry”. The point is modularity. So “case study” is enough for a case study. And “case” is enough for a case. (without describing the study –methodology, theory- behind it). Then “participation” is another tag. * True in principle, but there do seem to be some differences between wiki categories and keywords more generally (although we're all just learning). The fundamental difference seems to be that there is no way to use multiple wiki categories at once to find, for example, all “cases” with “participation”. This leads to the use of long categories involving multiple concepts. Also, wiki categories are used as the title of pages and longer ones are helpful for this. As we move to the semantic wiki, it looks like the modular approach will be possible. ==Case study literature database== * Investigate possible technologies for managing/sharing case study literature ** e.g. [http://www.mendeley.com/ Mendeley] or [http://www.citeulike.org/ Citeulike] ===Do we separate cases from Forsys participants from cases from the literature?=== * Assuming institutionalization of the wiki and not of the Cost Action per se, it does not matter whether a forsys member has delivered a case or a case study. Of course it does for the record of the Action, so a separate tag “Forsys member” should do. * This is a good point. The initial thinking is that these will be stored in different data structures: the wiki for forsys cases and a literature database (maybe Mendeley.com for the literature). However, somehow we would need to link from each to the guidelines they relate to. ==Publications== * Think of publication possibilities for case study work ===Possibilities=== * Book: similar to country reports book; would require a high level of effort and good contributions * Journal special issue: what possible journals? Forest Systems, ??? * Individual journal articles: just encourage/help cases submit articles individually * Wiki: as a minimum, we'll post all cases to the wiki and use the semantic forms to make connections between them * Other??? ==DONE== ===After the Leuven 2011 meeting=== * Synthesized Leuven discussion and updated [[Case Study Guidelines]] on the wiki * Developed semantic wiki form for [[STSM Opportunities]] ===At Leuven 2011 meeting=== * Give case study introductory presentation * Each STC member leads a subgroup on assigned task * Develop & present a time line for the work on the case studies ** incl. meeting of the STC ** incl. clear division of responsibilities ===Before the Leuven 2011 meeting=== *Develop two (or more) documents: ** [[Case Study Notes by Research Phase]]: organize information already generated about the case study guidelines ** [[2011-11_Leuven_Case_Study_Agenda]] *Gather further information on case studies (STC sends request to country representatives) ** Existing forest DSS case studies ** Potential forest DSS case studies ** Other relevant literature (methods, theories, etc)

Return to Case Study Committee Workplan.