Difference between revisions of "Case Study Committee Workplan"
From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) |
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) m |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<div style="float:right;">__TOC__</div> | <div style="float:right;">__TOC__</div> | ||
| − | + | ==Timeline== | |
| − | * | + | * 18 November 2011 : FORSYS participants submit STSM opportunities to wiki |
| − | * | + | * Mar - Apr 2012 : Case study technical committee (CSTC) develops example cases |
| − | * | + | * May (Zvolen meeting) : CSTC reports on progress and coordinates work with other WGs |
| − | * | + | * Sept 2012 : CSTC representatives participate in Wiki Task Force meeting; discuss how to integrate cases into semantic wiki |
| − | * | + | * Oct 2012: CSTC provides develops & tests [[Form:Case study|case input form]] for semantic wiki |
| − | * | + | * Nov 2012: CSTC solicits short cases from Forsys participants |
| − | + | * Nov 2012 - Jan 2013 : CSTC follow up on potential cases, answer any questions, provide feedback on drafts | |
| − | + | * Feb 2013 : CTSC meets to review and synthesize cases for presentation/publication/contributing to FORSYS guidelines | |
| − | * | + | * Mar 2013: CSTC finishes case synthesis article to inform broader FORSYS guidelines |
| − | * 2013 | + | * April 2013 : Selected cases and synthesis presented at Umea conference |
| − | * technically have until 3 months after end of project (4/2013) to complete all project work | + | * (technically have until 3 months after end of project (4/2013) to complete all project work) |
| − | ==Develop case study guidelines== | + | ==Develop case study examples and guidelines== |
| + | * Develop semantic form for entering case studies into the wiki | ||
* Figure out how cases will contribute to final Forsys guidelines | * Figure out how cases will contribute to final Forsys guidelines | ||
| − | |||
==Manage case study contributions== | ==Manage case study contributions== | ||
| − | |||
* Solicit case studies from the Forsys network | * Solicit case studies from the Forsys network | ||
* Review and comment on case studies submitted | * Review and comment on case studies submitted | ||
* Answer questions, resolve issues | * Answer questions, resolve issues | ||
| − | == | + | ===Use of published literature=== |
| + | * Assuming institutionalization of the wiki and not of the Cost Action per se, it does not matter whether a forsys member has delivered a case or a case study. Of course it does for the record of the Action, so a separate tag “Forsys member” should do. | ||
| + | * This is a good point. The initial thinking is that these will be stored in different data structures: the wiki for forsys cases and a literature database (maybe Mendeley.com for the literature). However, somehow we would need to link from each to the guidelines they relate to. | ||
* Investigate possible technologies for managing/sharing case study literature | * Investigate possible technologies for managing/sharing case study literature | ||
** e.g. [http://www.mendeley.com/ Mendeley] or [http://www.citeulike.org/ Citeulike] | ** e.g. [http://www.mendeley.com/ Mendeley] or [http://www.citeulike.org/ Citeulike] | ||
| − | == | + | ===Categorization and searching of cases=== |
| − | * | + | * The case study semantic form |
| + | ** tags each case with the general [[:Category:Case]] | ||
| + | ** uses the other fields in the case form as tags/categorizies (e.g. Country, Decision phase) | ||
| + | * Cases can be searched/filtered using custom semantic queries or pre-build semantic query pages | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Synthesis of cases== | ||
| + | * Synthesis of the cases will focus on their recorded lessons, and how these lessons contribute to the overall FORSYS lessons/guidelines | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Sharing results== | ||
| + | * The CTSC is hosting all cases to the FORSYS wiki | ||
| + | * The CSTC has submitted a presentation proposal for the final FORSYS conference in April 2013 | ||
| + | * The CSTC has also proposed a case synthesis journal article for the FORSYS conference issue of the Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research | ||
| + | * Other ideas??? | ||
==DONE== | ==DONE== | ||
===After the Leuven 2011 meeting=== | ===After the Leuven 2011 meeting=== | ||
| − | * | + | * Synthesized Leuven discussion and updated [[Case Study Guidelines]] on the wiki |
| − | * Developed semantic wiki form for | + | * Developed semantic wiki form for [[STSM Opportunities]] |
| + | |||
| + | ===At Leuven 2011 meeting=== | ||
| + | * Give case study introductory presentation | ||
| + | * Each STC member leads a subgroup on assigned task | ||
| + | * Develop & present a time line for the work on the case studies | ||
| + | ** incl. meeting of the STC | ||
| + | ** incl. clear division of responsibilities | ||
===Before the Leuven 2011 meeting=== | ===Before the Leuven 2011 meeting=== | ||
| Line 47: | Line 67: | ||
** Potential forest DSS case studies | ** Potential forest DSS case studies | ||
** Other relevant literature (methods, theories, etc) | ** Other relevant literature (methods, theories, etc) | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 21:16, 18 November 2012
Timeline
- 18 November 2011 : FORSYS participants submit STSM opportunities to wiki
- Mar - Apr 2012 : Case study technical committee (CSTC) develops example cases
- May (Zvolen meeting) : CSTC reports on progress and coordinates work with other WGs
- Sept 2012 : CSTC representatives participate in Wiki Task Force meeting; discuss how to integrate cases into semantic wiki
- Oct 2012: CSTC provides develops & tests case input form for semantic wiki
- Nov 2012: CSTC solicits short cases from Forsys participants
- Nov 2012 - Jan 2013 : CSTC follow up on potential cases, answer any questions, provide feedback on drafts
- Feb 2013 : CTSC meets to review and synthesize cases for presentation/publication/contributing to FORSYS guidelines
- Mar 2013: CSTC finishes case synthesis article to inform broader FORSYS guidelines
- April 2013 : Selected cases and synthesis presented at Umea conference
- (technically have until 3 months after end of project (4/2013) to complete all project work)
Develop case study examples and guidelines
- Develop semantic form for entering case studies into the wiki
- Figure out how cases will contribute to final Forsys guidelines
Manage case study contributions
- Solicit case studies from the Forsys network
- Review and comment on case studies submitted
- Answer questions, resolve issues
Use of published literature
- Assuming institutionalization of the wiki and not of the Cost Action per se, it does not matter whether a forsys member has delivered a case or a case study. Of course it does for the record of the Action, so a separate tag “Forsys member” should do.
- This is a good point. The initial thinking is that these will be stored in different data structures: the wiki for forsys cases and a literature database (maybe Mendeley.com for the literature). However, somehow we would need to link from each to the guidelines they relate to.
- Investigate possible technologies for managing/sharing case study literature
Categorization and searching of cases
- The case study semantic form
- tags each case with the general Category:Case
- uses the other fields in the case form as tags/categorizies (e.g. Country, Decision phase)
- Cases can be searched/filtered using custom semantic queries or pre-build semantic query pages
Synthesis of cases
- Synthesis of the cases will focus on their recorded lessons, and how these lessons contribute to the overall FORSYS lessons/guidelines
Sharing results
- The CTSC is hosting all cases to the FORSYS wiki
- The CSTC has submitted a presentation proposal for the final FORSYS conference in April 2013
- The CSTC has also proposed a case synthesis journal article for the FORSYS conference issue of the Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research
- Other ideas???
DONE
After the Leuven 2011 meeting
- Synthesized Leuven discussion and updated Case Study Guidelines on the wiki
- Developed semantic wiki form for STSM Opportunities
At Leuven 2011 meeting
- Give case study introductory presentation
- Each STC member leads a subgroup on assigned task
- Develop & present a time line for the work on the case studies
- incl. meeting of the STC
- incl. clear division of responsibilities
Before the Leuven 2011 meeting
- Develop two (or more) documents:
- Case Study Notes by Research Phase: organize information already generated about the case study guidelines
- 2011-11_Leuven_Case_Study_Agenda
- Gather further information on case studies (STC sends request to country representatives)
- Existing forest DSS case studies
- Potential forest DSS case studies
- Other relevant literature (methods, theories, etc)
