Difference between revisions of "OSMOSE"

From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: require(): Unable to allocate memory for pool. in /data/home/fp0804/www/wiki/includes/AutoLoader.php on line 1191
m (1 revision: Import from testwiki)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
{{DSS description, Name, responsible organisation and contact person
+
{{DSS, Wiki quality control
−
|Name=On-site multicriteria optimisation and spatial evaluation for sustainable spatial development
+
|Has flag=N/A
−
|Acronym=OSMOSE
+
−
|Responsible organisation=KU Leuven
+
−
|Type of the owner organization=national administration, research institution
+
−
|Institutional framework=open source product
+
−
|Contact person for the Wiki=Annelies De Meyer
+
−
|Contact e-mail for the Wiki=annelies.demeyer@ees.kuleuven.be
+
−
|Contact person for the DSS=Jos Van Orshoven
+
−
|Contact e-mail for the DSS=jos.vanorshoven@ees.kuleuven.be
+
−
|Additional information=
+
−
 
+
−
+
 
}}
 
}}
−
{{DSS description, Scope of the tool
+
{{DSS, Name, responsible organisation and contact person
−
|Description=OSMOSE stands for a conceptual generator of specific decision support systems for spatial allocation of land use types. The OSMOSE-framework is designed to address four types of questions concerning land use planning:
+
|Has full name=On-site multicriteria optimisation and spatial evaluation for sustainable spatial development
 +
|Has acronym=OSMOSE
 +
|Has wiki contact person=Annelies De Meyer
 +
|Has wiki contact e-mail=annelies.demeyer@ees.kuleuven.be
 +
}}
 +
{{DSS, Software identification
 +
|Has software=OSMOSE.Software
 +
}}
 +
{{DSS, Description
 +
|Has description=OSMOSE stands for a conceptual generator of specific decision support systems (DSS) for spatial allocation of land use types. The DSS to be generated by OSMOSE are meant to (i) identify land units which meet multiple predefined attribute values for a specific land use type (LUT) and (ii) rank land units for a given LUT according to these multiple attributes. A complementary purpose is to identify and rank LUTs for a given land unit. The proposed framework is extremely flexible as it can accommodate continuous and ordinal, differentially weighted attributes (with unequal number of classes), alternative land unit definitions, land use types and climate change scenarios.
  
−
1. What is the performance of a considered land unit under the current land use type ? This ‘What?’ question inquires, for the selected land units, the value of one or more specific ES-attributes for the current (initial) land use type (iLUT);
+
The OSMOSE-framework is designed to address four types of specific questions concerning land use planning:
  
−
2. What would the performance of a land unit be if iLUT is converted into a new ‘target’ land use type (tLUT) ? This ‘What if?’ question inquires, for the selected land units, the value of one or more specific ES-attributes after a particular change from iLUT to a specified tLUT;
+
1. What is the performance of a considered land unit under the current land use type ? This ‘What?’ question inquires, for the selected land units, the value of one or more specific attributes for the current (ini
−
 
+
|Has modelling scope=user defined
−
3. Where (on which land units) should a tLUT be applied to obtain a performance that complies with specified ES attributes thresholds or to obtain the best possible performance? This ‘Where?’ question ascertains about those land units which meet the proposed ES-attribute values or which are best ranked according to these attributes;
+
|Has temporal scale=Long term (strategic)
−
 
+
|Has spatial context=Spatial with no neighbourhood interrelations
−
4. Which tLUT should be applied on a selected land unit to obtain a performance that complies with specified ES attributes thresholds or to obtain the best possible performance? This ‘How?’ question aims to identify, for each land unit, the tLUT that meets the proposed ES attribute values or that is best ranked according to these attributes.
+
|Has spatial scale=Forest level, Regional/national level
−
 
+
|Has objectives dimension=Multiple objectives, Single objective
−
In all these questions ‘performance’ is multi-dimensional. This means that the performance of a land unit/land use type (LUT) combination is determined by one or more ES attributes. Consequently, each question can require a multi-criteria analysis in which appropriate methods must be applied and in which the ES-attributes not necessarily have the same importance and hence are differentially weighted.
+
|Has goods and services dimension=Non-market services
−
 
+
|Has decision making dimension=More than one decision maker/stakeholder
−
Question types 2, 3 and 4 relate to land use change. The assumption is that at the transition from one land use type to another, the performance (or ES-level) changes. This change can occur rather abruptly in time or can evolve gradually towards a new equilibrium status.
+
|Has forest management goal=user defined
−
 
+
|Supports tree species=user defined
−
Based on the concepts presented in the previous section, the OSMOSE software framework was developed with a view to materialise a flexible generator of sDSS so that diverse specific decision support systems can be developed for different circumstances. This implies that users (i) can define, add and delete different regions of interest and climate scenarios, land units, land use types, ES-attributes and (ii) can edit the related data values. To achieve this flexibility, the generator was conceived in an integrated, modular fashion. Four modules are at stake: (i) a geospatial database, (ii) a geospatial visualisation and analysis module, (iii) an advanced query module and (iv) a user interface. Implicitly a 5th module is present, i.e. a knowledge and model base which is required to assess the ES-values for the different combinations of scenario, land unit and land use type.
+
|Supports silvicultural regime=user defined
−
 
+
−
|Modelling dimension=user defined
+
−
|Temporal scale=long term (strategic)
+
−
|Spatial context=spatial with no neighbourhood interrelations
+
−
|Spatial scale=regional/national level, forest level
+
−
|Objectives dimension=single objective, multiple objectives
+
−
|Goods and services dimension=non-market services
+
−
|Forest management goal=user defined
+
−
|Supported tree species=user defined
+
−
|Supported silvicultural regime=user defined
+
−
|Decision making dimension=more than one decision maker/stakeholder
+
−
|Participatory planning tasks supported=evaluating options
+
−
}}
+
−
{{DSS description, Concrete application
+
−
|Country=Belgium, Burundi, Ecuador, Ethiopia
+
−
|Number of users=N/A
+
−
|Number of real-life applications=N/A
+
−
|Utilisation in education: kind of utilisation (demo, use)=presentation/demo
+
−
}}
+
−
{{DSS description, Installation and support
+
−
|Status=used (stable and not upgraded/not upgraded recently)
+
−
|Accessibility=open source/public access
+
−
|Commercial product=No
+
−
|Deployment cost=N/A
+
−
|Price=
+
−
}}
+
−
{{DSS description, Data, data model and data management
+
−
|Input data requirements=user defined
+
−
|Format of the input data=database
+
−
|Data validation=N/A
+
−
|Format of the output data=table, map
+
−
|Database=PostgreSQL
+
−
|GIS integration=other
+
−
}}
+
−
{{DSS description, Models and methods, MBMS, decision support techniques
+
−
|Forest models=N/A
+
−
|Ecological models=N/A
+
−
|Social models=N/A
+
−
|MCDM methods=Goal programming (GP)
+
−
|Risk evaluation=N/A
+
−
|Uncertainty evaluation=N/A
+
−
}}
+
−
{{DSS description, Support of knowledge management process
+
−
|Integrated KM techniques to identify and structure knowledge=
+
−
|Integrated KM techniques to analyse and apply knowledge=
+
 
}}
 
}}
−
{{DSS description, Support of social participation
+
{{DSS, Concrete application
−
|Stakeholder identification support=
+
|Has country=Belgium, Burundi, Ecuador, Ethiopia
−
|Planning criteria formation support=
+
|Has number of users=N/A
−
|Planning process monitoring and evaluation=
+
|Has number of real-life applications=N/A
−
|Planning outcome monitoring and evaluation=
+
|Has utilisation in education=presentation/demo
 
}}
 
}}
−
{{DSS description, User interface and outputs
+
{{DSS, Decision support techniques used in the DSS
−
|User access control=Yes
+
|Has decision support techniques=OSMOSE.Decision support techniques
−
|Parameterised GUI=No
+
−
|User-friendliness of GUI=appropriate presentation
+
 
}}
 
}}
−
{{DSS description, System design and development
+
{{DSS, Support of Knowledge Management
−
|Stakeholder identification support=
+
|Has knowledge management processes=OSMOSE.Knowledge management process
−
|Planning criteria formation support=
+
 
}}
 
}}
−
{{DSS description, Technological architecture, integration with other systems
+
{{DSS, Support of social participation
−
|Programming language=C#
+
|Has support for social participation=OSMOSE.Support of social participation
−
|Scalability=No
+
 
}}
 
}}
−
{{DSS description, Ongoing development
+
{{DSS, DSS development
−
|Adaptation effort (man years)=N/A
+
|Has DSS development=OSMOSE.Description of DSS development
 
}}
 
}}
−
{{DSS description, Documentation
+
{{DSS, Documentation
−
|Manual=No
+
|Has manual=No
−
|Technical documentation=No
+
|Has technical documentation=No
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 15:42, 2 April 2013

Wiki quality control

Has flag N/A

Name, responsible organisation and contact person

Has full name On-site multicriteria optimisation and spatial evaluation for sustainable spatial development
Has acronym OSMOSE
Has wiki contact person Annelies De Meyer
Has wiki contact e-mail annelies.demeyer@ees.kuleuven.be

Software identification

Has software OSMOSE.Software

Description

Has description OSMOSE stands for a conceptual generator of specific decision support systems (DSS) for spatial allocation of land use types. The DSS to be generated by OSMOSE are meant to (i) identify land units which meet multiple predefined attribute values for a specific land use type (LUT) and (ii) rank land units for a given LUT according to these multiple attributes. A complementary purpose is to identify and rank LUTs for a given land unit. The proposed framework is extremely flexible as it can accommodate continuous and ordinal, differentially weighted attributes (with unequal number of classes), alternative land unit definitions, land use types and climate change scenarios.

The OSMOSE-framework is designed to address four types of specific questions concerning land use planning:

1. What is the performance of a considered land unit under the current land use type ? This ‘What?’ question inquires, for the selected land units, the value of one or more specific attributes for the current (ini

Has modelling scope user defined
Has temporal scale Long term (strategic)
Has spatial context Spatial with no neighbourhood interrelations
Has spatial scale Forest level, Regional/national level
Has objectives dimension Multiple objectives, Single objective
Has related DSS
Has goods and services dimension Non-market services
Has decision making dimension More than one decision maker/stakeholder
Has forest management goal user defined
Supports tree species user defined
Supports silvicultural regime user defined

Concrete application

Has typical use case
Has user profile
Has country Belgium, Burundi, Ecuador, Ethiopia
Has references about examples of application
Has number of users N/A
Has number of real-life applications N/A
Has utilisation in education presentation/demo
Has research project reference
Has tool dissemination

Decision support techniques used in the DSS

Has decision support techniques OSMOSE.Decision support techniques

Support of Knowledge Management

Has knowledge management processes OSMOSE.Knowledge management process

Support of social participation

Has support for social participation OSMOSE.Support of social participation

DSS development

Has DSS development OSMOSE.Description of DSS development

Documentation

Has website
Has online demo
Has manual No
Has technical documentation No
Has reference
Retrieved from "http://fp0804.emu.ee/wiki/index.php?title=OSMOSE&oldid=6427"