Difference between revisions of "Using Actor Network Theory in the design stage can help in understanding the dynamism of the network"
From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "Stakeholder involvement in the development and use of DSS" to "Participation") |
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Lesson | {{Lesson | ||
+ | |ID=39 | ||
|Has statement=Using Actor Network Theory in the design stage can help in understanding the dynamism of the network | |Has statement=Using Actor Network Theory in the design stage can help in understanding the dynamism of the network | ||
|Has evidence=Having started from a DSS that doesn’t exist yet and from an unstructured decision problem we are now tracing connections in real time. | |Has evidence=Having started from a DSS that doesn’t exist yet and from an unstructured decision problem we are now tracing connections in real time. | ||
Line 25: | Line 26: | ||
|Has actor perspective=Developer/Architect, Researcher | |Has actor perspective=Developer/Architect, Researcher | ||
|Has researcher role=Decision analyst | |Has researcher role=Decision analyst | ||
− | |||
}} | }} | ||
+ | WG1: [[Wg1::Participation]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | WG4: [[Wg4::Institutionalization]] |
Latest revision as of 06:13, 23 September 2013
Lesson
ID | 39 |
---|---|
Has statement | Using Actor Network Theory in the design stage can help in understanding the dynamism of the network |
Has evidence | Having started from a DSS that doesn’t exist yet and from an unstructured decision problem we are now tracing connections in real time. |
Has consequences | Studying an ongoing process avoids backwards tracing and thus facilitates the analyst. |
Has recommendation for action | Start to trace relations and to follow the actors (both humans and technology) from the design phase of the whole process. |
Has domain | Participation |
Has DSS development stage | Specification |
Has decision stage | organization |
Has temporal scale | Long term (strategic) |
Has spatial context | Spatial with neighbourhood interrelations |
Has spatial scale | Forest level, Regional/national level |
Has objectives dimension | Multiple objectives |
Has goods and services dimension | Market services, Non-market services |
Has decision making dimension | More than one decision maker/stakeholder |
Has country | Germany |
Has reference | See case |
Has related DSS | |
Has related case | Germany-Actor Network Theory to Understand Collaborative Decision Support Systems Development in Forest Management Practice |
Has related lesson | Visualization of the preliminary actor network made the people explicity include the DSS in a planning process. |
Has other relevant information | See case |
Has working group theme | Dss development process, Participation |
Has DSS development | Using Actor Network Theory in the design stage can help in understanding the dynamism of the network.Description of DSS development |
Has decision support techniques | Using Actor Network Theory in the design stage can help in understanding the dynamism of the network.Decision support techniques |
Has knowledge management processes | Using Actor Network Theory in the design stage can help in understanding the dynamism of the network.Knowledge management process |
Has support for social participation | Using Actor Network Theory in the design stage can help in understanding the dynamism of the network.Support of social participation |
Has actor perspective | Developer/Architect, Researcher |
Has researcher role | Decision analyst |
Has user role | |
Has developer role |
- has related Lesson:Actor Network Theory provides a suitable lens for exploring both technical and human aspects of DSS institutionalization in the forestry domain
WG1: Participation
WG4: Institutionalization