|
|
| (14 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
Warning: require(): Unable to allocate memory for pool. in /data/home/fp0804/www/wiki/includes/AutoLoader.php on line 1191
| − | == General System description ==
| + | #REDIRECT [[ESC]] |
| − | | + | |
| − | System name: Ecological Site Classification Acronym: ESC
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Brief overview ===
| + | |
| − | The system enables the appropriate choice of tree species or NVC woodland type on the basis of site climate and soil quality. Built into the tool are methods to assess soil quality from soil type and indicator plants.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | [[Category:Help documents]] | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | __TOC__
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Scope of the system ===
| + | |
| − | * tool encourages decision maker to discover new problems or opportunities by exposing to new information or results
| + | |
| − | * tool helps decision makers in recognizing upcoming problems for which solutions have been developed previously
| + | |
| − | * tool allows decision maker to actively create new knowledge when faced with a new problem and to develop novel solutions
| + | |
| − | * tool allows decision maker to capture knowledge, making it available to decision makers who are seeking solutions from previously solved problems
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === System origin ===
| + | |
| − | * Developed by Mike Perks, Alan Harrison and Stephen Bathgate. Being an integration product its development would not have been possible without fundamental building blocks such as ESC, Forest Gales and many other Forest Research models.
| + | |
| − | * Currently free to use at stand scale via web.
| + | |
| − | * Some small scale use in public and private sector.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Support for specific issues ===
| + | |
| − | Is the system designed to take into account specific uses? E.g. guidance on ways to characterize biodiversity, economic-biodiversity tradeoff analysis methods, risk assessment methods, landscape analysis methods, timber harvest effects, climate change effects, biological effects (pests, pathogens, invasives), fire,...
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Support for specific thematic areas of a problem type ===
| + | |
| − | * Silvicultural
| + | |
| − | * Certification
| + | |
| − | * Conservation
| + | |
| − | * Restoration
| + | |
| − | * Development choices / land use zoning
| + | |
| − | * Policy/intervention alternatives
| + | |
| − | * Sustainability impact assessment (SIA)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Capability to support decision making phases ===
| + | |
| − | * Intelligence (gives user detailed site analysis - climate and soil parameters)
| + | |
| − | * Design (provides site analysis in context of many themes)
| + | |
| − | * Choice (allows user to vary species choice, management options)
| + | |
| − | * Monitor (highlights risks which in theory could encourage monitoring)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Related systems ===
| + | |
| − | Describe (and/or link to) other systems related
| + | |
| − | *EMIS
| + | |
| − | *Forest Gales
| + | |
| − | *Conifer Timber Quality Model
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Data and data models ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Typical spatial extent of application ===
| + | |
| − | Web based tool operates at stand scale, ca 1-5 hectares, batch GIS tool has generated regional and national scenarios.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Forest data input ===
| + | |
| − | Location via OS GB six figure grid reference, eg NT090950. User also supplies an FC soil type (eg 1g, 4, 7bz), lithology/geology, the presence of heather, aspect and slope.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Type of information input from user (via GUI) ===
| + | |
| − | User selects one or more tree species for detailed analysis from an intermediate screen.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Models ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Forest models ===
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Growth, wind hazard, timber quality, planting windows, fertiliser, species suitability (ESC), cultivation, risk and brash/stump models.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Social models ===
| + | |
| − | N/a
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Decision Support ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Definition of management interventions ===
| + | |
| − | Timing of planting, fertilisation, rotations, species choice.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Prescription enumerating all selected possibilities at stand level, coarser information in GIS layers.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Typical temporal scale of application ===
| + | |
| − | Allows full lifecycle analysis of a rotation 30-80+ years.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Types of decisions supported ===
| + | |
| − | *Management level
| + | |
| − | **strategic decisions
| + | |
| − | **administrative decisions
| + | |
| − | **operating control decisions
| + | |
| − | * Management function
| + | |
| − | * planning decisions
| + | |
| − | **organizing decisions
| + | |
| − | **command decisions
| + | |
| − | **control decisions
| + | |
| − | ** coordination decisions
| + | |
| − | *decision making situation
| + | |
| − | **unilateral
| + | |
| − | ** collegial
| + | |
| − | **Bargaining / participative decision making
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Decision-making processes and models ===
| + | |
| − | *Logic modeling
| + | |
| − | *Operations research modeling
| + | |
| − | **Direct approaches
| + | |
| − | **Heuristic manipulation of simulation models
| + | |
| − | *Multiple criteria/ranking
| + | |
| − | *Other
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Output ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Types of outputs ===
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Stand version generates tables in HTML, thematic maps can be generated via a batch tool for visualisation in GIS, assuming suitable soil data is available.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Spatial analysis capabilities ===
| + | |
| − | * integrated capabilities
| + | |
| − | * GIS links via batch tool. Limitations in this context due to availability of digital soil maps.
| + | |
| − | * provides standard data import/export formats
| + | |
| − | * allows spatial analysis, batch tool generates thematic layers
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Abilities to address interdisciplinary, multi-scaled, and political issues ===
| + | |
| − | Evaluate interactions between different basic information types (biophysical, economic, social). Produce coordinated results for decision makers operating at different spatial scales facilitate social negotiation and learning
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == System ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === System requirements ===
| + | |
| − | * Java library deployed on Linux and Windows. UI available at stand level via web, or batch system via command line.
| + | |
| − | * Utilises many open source Java libraries, GRASS GIS or ArcGIS required for batch stage. Data currently managed in Oracle database or as raster files.
| + | |
| − | * Beta trial
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Architecture and major DSS components ===
| + | |
| − | 3 tier architecture ( UI, Models, Data)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Web based UI using JSP, HTML, CSS
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Also desktop batch tool for GIS processing using Java.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Models are implemented in java and EMIS libraries assemble these in order to answer user questions. These can be called independently if necessary.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Highly modular, components based on themes eg species suitability, wind hazard, etc.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Some simple web service interfaces developed using document literal style WSDL/SOAP and REST.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Basic dataflow is location accesses site climate data, this and other user input data are then processed by the various models to generate outputs.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Usage ===
| + | |
| − | Used in education, public and private sector forestry and research.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Computational limitations ===
| + | |
| − | Typical processing time for Scottish Forest District 6-8 hours (vector-raster intersection step takes 5-6 hours, models execute over 4000 components in about 1 hour, but this varies according to species etc). Large scale spatial intersections sometimes exhaust machine memory with ArcGIS.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === User interface ===
| + | |
| − | Web UI requires some understanding of soil types, OS grid references, reference to geological maps. Interpretation of information can be challenging so support is being developed.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Documentation and support ===
| + | |
| − | None to date. Support available via email.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Installation ===
| + | |
| − | * Prerequisite knowledge: Requires web browser. Server installation requires specialised skills and tools. Batch mode requires some configuration on host machine.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ==References==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ===Cited references===
| + | |
| − | <references/>
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ===External resources===
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''General System description'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''System name: Ecological Site Classification '''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''Acronym: ESC'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''Brief overview'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | The system enables the appropriate choice of tree species or NVC woodland type on the basis of site climate and soil quality. Built into the tool are methods to assess soil quality from soil type and indicator plants.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''Contents'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''1 General System description'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''1.1 Brief overview'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''1.2 Scope of the system'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''1.3 System origin'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | The system was developed in the 1990s but the origins can be traced to a publication by Anderson in the 1950s and earlier works that identified relationships between site quality and vegetation.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''1.4 Support for specific issues'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''1.5 Support for specific thematic areas of a problem type'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''1.6 Capability to support decision making phases '''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''1.7 Related systems'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Establishment management information system (EMIS)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''2 Data and data models'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''2.1 Typical spatial extent of application'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ESC can be applied at stand level (1 hectare) via a web interface or landscape scape via a GIS batch tool, assuming suitable data exist.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''2.2 Forest data input'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | The inputs are site location, which derives climate data from a database (and very coarse resolution soil data).
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''2.3 Type of information input from user (via GUI)'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Ideally the user supplies the results of a soil survey and on site vegetation.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''3 Models'''
| + | |
| − |
| + | |
| − | '''3.1 Forest models'''
| + | |
| − |
| + | |
| − | Uses species suitability models and various tools to calculate soil properties from plants and/or soil profile information.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''3.2 Social models'''
| + | |
| − |
| + | |
| − | n/a
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''4 Decision Support'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''4.1 Typical temporal scale of application '''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Has limited capability to project suitability indexes into future climates to 2080.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''4.2 Types of decisions supported'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Planning decisions eg
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Tree species to plant on site.
| + | |
| − | Site type/quality assessments.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''4.3 Decision-making processes and models'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''5 Output'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''5.1 Types of outputs'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Species suitability responses against climate and soil factors.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''5.2 Spatial analysis capabilities'''
| + | |
| − |
| + | |
| − | GIS visualisation available via offline batch tool.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''5.3 Abilities to address interdisciplinary, multi-scaled, and political issues'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Can identify sites for restoration to pre afforestation status.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''6 System'''
| + | |
| − | '''6.1 System requirements '''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Stand tool - user requires web browser ( tested on IE6 and Firefox )
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''6.2 Architecture and major DSS components'''
| + | |
| − |
| + | |
| − | Three tier architecture facilitating desktop or server deployment. Key components are web UI, batch UI, model codes and data.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''6.3 Usage'''
| + | |
| − |
| + | |
| − | Utilised by forest planners in public/private sector, students and researchers.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''6.4 Computational limitations'''
| + | |
| − |
| + | |
| − | Very light to run, but can take sometime to process large quantites of data.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''6.5 User interface'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Stand tool uses HTML/CSS. Command line batch mode to generate GIS results and GIS extension to ArcView.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''6.6 Documentation and support'''
| + | |
| − |
| + | |
| − | In development, support via FC training courses and bulletin.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | '''6.7 Installation'''
| + | |
| − |
| + | |
| − | Web browser for stand version. GIS batch tool requires Java 1.4, Grass and related ESC datasets. A spatial version also exists based on ArcView/Spatial Analyst.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Server installation requires J2EE server such as Tomcat or Oracle Application Server and an oracle database.
| + | |
