Difference between revisions of "Heureka"
From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
(→User interface) |
m (1 revision: Import from testwiki) |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | = | + | {{DSS, Wiki quality control |
| − | + | |Has flag=red | |
| − | + | }} | |
| − | + | {{DSS, Name, responsible organisation and contact person | |
| − | == | + | |Has full name=Heureka PlanWise |
| − | + | |Has acronym=Heureka PlanWise | |
| − | + | |Has wiki contact person=Tomas Lämås | |
| − | + | |Has wiki contact e-mail=tomas.lamas@slu.se | |
| − | + | }} | |
| − | + | {{DSS, Software identification | |
| − | + | |Has software=Heureka.Software | |
| − | + | }} | |
| − | + | {{DSS, Description | |
| − | + | |Has description=Heureka is a system for long and medium term forestry planning and scenario analysis. It consists of | |
| − | + | several applications: (1) StandWise for stand-level management analysis, (2) PlanWise for forest-level planning, (3) RegWise for regional scenario analysis, (4) PlanEval for multi-criteria deciion analysis to rank plans created in PlanWise and RegWise with one pr more stakeholders, and (5) Habitat Prognosis, a AcGIS-abased application for habitat suitability analysis of a given plan. The system covers the whole decision support process from data inventory to tools for selecting among plan alternatives with multi-criteria decision making techniques. The system is designed for both large-scale and small-scale forestry. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | The system covers the whole decision support process from data inventory to tools for selecting among plan alternatives with multi-criteria decision making techniques. The system is designed for both large-scale and small-scale forestry. | + | |
| − | + | ||
The utilities handled today are | The utilities handled today are | ||
| − | + | timber and bio-fuel production, | |
| − | + | carbon sequestration, | |
| − | + | biodiversity, and | |
| − | + | recreation. | |
| − | + | |Has modelling scope=Economical indicators, Forest indicators, Ecological indicators, Climate change | |
| − | + | |Has temporal scale=Long term (strategic), Medium term (tactical) | |
| − | + | |Has spatial context=Spatial with no neighbourhood interrelations | |
| − | + | |Has spatial scale=Forest level | |
| − | + | |Has objectives dimension=Multiple objectives | |
| − | + | |Has related DSS=Heureka RegWise | |
| − | + | |Has goods and services dimension=Market wood products, Non-market services | |
| − | + | |Has decision making dimension=Single decision maker | |
| − | + | |Has forest management goal=multi-functional | |
| − | + | |Supports tree species=Several Scandinavian | |
| − | + | |Supports silvicultural regime=even-aged, uneven-aged/natural regeneration | |
| − | + | }} | |
| − | + | {{DSS, Concrete application | |
| − | = | + | |Has typical use case=Forest management planning on an estate (company) level, long as well as short term. Landscape level analyses, e.g., watershed level |
| − | + | |Has user profile=local communities, private legal entities (cooperatives / corporations / trusts / partnerships / condominium associations) | |
| − | + | |Has country=Sweden | |
| − | + | |Has number of users=<=100 | |
| − | = | + | |Has number of real-life applications=<=100 |
| − | + | |Has utilisation in education=used by students | |
| − | + | |Has research project reference=Horstkotte, T., Moen, J., Lämås, T. & Helle, T. 2011. The legacy of logging. Estimating arboreal lichen occurrence in a boreal multiple-use landscape on a two century scale. PLoS ONE 6(12) e28779. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028779 | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | = | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | == | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | == | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | === | + | Korosuo, A., Wikström, P., Öhman, K. and Eriksson, L.O. 2011. An integrated MCDA software application for forest planning: a case study in southwestern Sweden. Mathematical and Computational Forestry & Natural-Resource Sciences 3(2), 75-86. |
| − | + | |Has tool dissemination=Courses | |
| − | + | }} | |
| − | + | {{DSS, Decision support techniques used in the DSS | |
| − | + | |Has decision support techniques=Heureka.Decision support techniques | |
| + | |Has knowledge management processes=Heureka.Knowledge management process | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | {{DSS, Support of Knowledge Management | ||
| + | |Has knowledge management processes=Heureka.Knowledge management process | ||
| + | |Has support for social participation=Heureka.Support of social participation | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | {{DSS, Support of social participation | ||
| + | |Has support for social participation=Heureka.Support of social participation | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | {{DSS, DSS development | ||
| + | |Has DSS development=Heureka.Description of DSS development | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | {{DSS, Documentation | ||
| + | |Has website=http://www.slu.se/heureka | ||
| + | |Has manual=Yes | ||
| + | |Has technical documentation=Yes | ||
| + | |Has reference=Wikström, P., L. Edenius, Elfving, B., Eriksson, L.O., Lämås, T., Sonesson, J., Öhman, K., Wallerman, J., Waller, C., Klintebäck, F. 2011. The Heureka forestry decision support system: An overview. Mathematical and Computational Forestry & Natural-Resource Sciences. 3(2): 87-94. | ||
| + | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 15:42, 2 April 2013
Contents
Wiki quality control
| Has flag | red |
|---|
Name, responsible organisation and contact person
| Has full name | Heureka PlanWise |
|---|---|
| Has acronym | Heureka PlanWise |
| Has wiki contact person | Tomas Lämås |
| Has wiki contact e-mail | tomas.lamas@slu.se |
Software identification
| Has software | Heureka.Software |
|---|
Description
| Has description | Heureka is a system for long and medium term forestry planning and scenario analysis. It consists of
several applications: (1) StandWise for stand-level management analysis, (2) PlanWise for forest-level planning, (3) RegWise for regional scenario analysis, (4) PlanEval for multi-criteria deciion analysis to rank plans created in PlanWise and RegWise with one pr more stakeholders, and (5) Habitat Prognosis, a AcGIS-abased application for habitat suitability analysis of a given plan. The system covers the whole decision support process from data inventory to tools for selecting among plan alternatives with multi-criteria decision making techniques. The system is designed for both large-scale and small-scale forestry. The utilities handled today are timber and bio-fuel production, carbon sequestration, biodiversity, and recreation. |
|---|---|
| Has modelling scope | Economical indicators, Forest indicators, Ecological indicators, Climate change |
| Has temporal scale | Long term (strategic), Medium term (tactical) |
| Has spatial context | Spatial with no neighbourhood interrelations |
| Has spatial scale | Forest level |
| Has objectives dimension | Multiple objectives |
| Has related DSS | Heureka RegWise |
| Has goods and services dimension | Market wood products, Non-market services |
| Has decision making dimension | Single decision maker |
| Has forest management goal | multi-functional |
| Supports tree species | Several Scandinavian |
| Supports silvicultural regime | even-aged, uneven-aged/natural regeneration |
Concrete application
| Has typical use case | Forest management planning on an estate (company) level, long as well as short term. Landscape level analyses, e.g., watershed level |
|---|---|
| Has user profile | local communities, private legal entities (cooperatives / corporations / trusts / partnerships / condominium associations) |
| Has country | Sweden |
| Has references about examples of application | |
| Has number of users | <=100 |
| Has number of real-life applications | <=100 |
| Has utilisation in education | used by students |
| Has research project reference | Horstkotte, T., Moen, J., Lämås, T. & Helle, T. 2011. The legacy of logging. Estimating arboreal lichen occurrence in a boreal multiple-use landscape on a two century scale. PLoS ONE 6(12) e28779. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028779
Korosuo, A., Wikström, P., Öhman, K. and Eriksson, L.O. 2011. An integrated MCDA software application for forest planning: a case study in southwestern Sweden. Mathematical and Computational Forestry & Natural-Resource Sciences 3(2), 75-86. |
| Has tool dissemination | Courses |
Decision support techniques used in the DSS
| Has decision support techniques | Heureka.Decision support techniques |
|---|
Support of Knowledge Management
| Has knowledge management processes | Heureka.Knowledge management process |
|---|
Support of social participation
| Has support for social participation | Heureka.Support of social participation |
|---|
DSS development
| Has DSS development | Heureka.Description of DSS development |
|---|
Documentation
| Has website | http://www.slu.se/heureka |
|---|---|
| Has online demo | |
| Has manual | Yes |
| Has technical documentation | Yes |
| Has reference | Wikström, P., L. Edenius, Elfving, B., Eriksson, L.O., Lämås, T., Sonesson, J., Öhman, K., Wallerman, J., Waller, C., Klintebäck, F. 2011. The Heureka forestry decision support system: An overview. Mathematical and Computational Forestry & Natural-Resource Sciences. 3(2): 87-94. |
