Difference between revisions of "ESC"

Warning: require(): Unable to allocate memory for pool. in /data/home/fp0804/www/wiki/includes/AutoLoader.php on line 1191

Revision as of 19:42, 4 September 2009 (view source) Francisco Girón Gesteira (Talk | contribs) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 06:57, 14 October 2012 (view source) Ola Eriksson (Talk | contribs)
(21 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 6:		Line 6:
	=== Brief overview ===		=== Brief overview ===
−	Part of the [[GB Forestry DSS |GB Forestry Decision Support System]], the system enables the appropriate choice of tree species or NVC woodland type on the basis of site climate and soil quality. Built into the tool are methods to assess soil quality from soil type and indicator plants.	+	ESC is a PC-based DSS that supports a methodology for the evaluation of the suitability of different tree species and woodland communities as defined in the National Vegetation Classification (NVC) for Great Britain, and also predicting yield in the form of a site index, on the UK forest land.
−		+
		+	[[Category:Decision support system]]
		+	[[Category:British DSS]]
	[[Category:GB Forestry DSS]]		[[Category:GB Forestry DSS]]
−	[[Category:Ecological Classification]]	+	[[Image:ESC brochure.jpg|thumb|ESC cover]]
−	[[Category:Species selection]]	+	[[Image:ESC main window.png|thumb|300px|ESC main window]]
	__TOC__		__TOC__
	=== Scope of the system ===		=== Scope of the system ===
−	This tool encourages the decision maker on the election of a forest species according to their suitability to the soil properties and climatic data. It also provides the suitability of the species according to the expected evolution of the climate.	+	This tool encourages the decision makers on the election of a suitable forest species according to their site soil properties and climatic data, instead of selecting an inadequate species and then trying to modify site characteristics to make it more suitable. It also provides the suitability of the species according to the expected evolution of the climate, and predicts the potential yield in the form of a site index. The number of tree species considered is 25, and there are also 20 native woodland types.
	=== System origin ===		=== System origin ===
−	* The system was developed in the 1990s but the origins can be traced to a publication by Anderson in the 1950s and earlier works that identified relationships between site quality and vegetation.	+	* The system was developed in the 1990s but the origins can be traced to a publication by Anderson in the 1950s and earlier works that identified relationships between site quality and vegetation. <br> It is developed by the Forestry Commission Research Agency, in a team led by Duncan Ray.
−	* Development led by Duncan Ray.	+	* ESC in its 1.7 version is available for purchasing at the [http://www.forestresearch.gov.uk/website/forestresearch.nsf/ByUnique/INFD-5VGF82 ESC website] for the price of 100£. <br> Currently, version 2.0 is free to use at stand scale via web as part of the [[GB Forestry DSS]] tools.
−	* Currently free to use at stand scale via web.	+	* Both the U.K. Forestry Standard and the U.K. Woodland Assurance Scheme support the use of ESC as an objective methodology for both the software objectives above described<ref> REYNOLDS K.M., TWERY M., LEXER M.J., VACIK H., RAY D., SHAO G,. et BORGES J.G.: ''Decision Support Systems in Forest Management'' IN BURSTEIN F. et HOLSAPPLE C. W. (EDS.) (2008): ''Handbook on Decision Support Systems 2: Variations''. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 800 pp. </ref>.
−	* GIS/Batch versions applied in consultancy work.	+
−	* Some use in public/private sector and in education. Well known.	+
	=== Support for specific issues  ===		=== Support for specific issues  ===
−	Species suitability and election, biodiversity and climate change effects on species suitability.	+	Species suitability and selection, biodiversity, and climate change effects on species suitability.
		+	[[Image:Screenshot-ESC.png|thumb|300px|A screenshot from the ESC free web version]]
	=== Support for specific thematic areas of a problem type  ===		=== Support for specific thematic areas of a problem type  ===
Line 35:		Line 35:
	* Development choices / land use zoning		* Development choices / land use zoning
	* Policy/intervention alternatives		* Policy/intervention alternatives
−	* Sustainability impact assessment (SIA)
	=== Capability to support decision making phases  ===		=== Capability to support decision making phases  ===
	* Intelligence		* Intelligence
−	:gives user detailed site analysis (climate and soil parameters)	+	:gives user detailed site analysis (climate and soil parameters).
	* Design		* Design
−	:provides site analysis in context of many themes	+	:provides site analysis in context of many themes.
	* Choice		* Choice
−	:allows user to vary species choice, management options	+	:allows user to vary species choice, management options.
	* Monitor		* Monitor
−	:highlights risks which in theory could encourage monitoring	+	:highlights risks which in theory could encourage monitoring.
	=== Related systems  ===		=== Related systems  ===
	Describe (and/or link to) other systems related		Describe (and/or link to) other systems related
		+	* [[GB Forestry DSS]]
	* [[Conifer Timber Quality Model]]		* [[Conifer Timber Quality Model]]
	* [[EMIS]]		* [[EMIS]]
	* [[Forest Gales]]		* [[Forest Gales]]
−	* Harpps	+	* [[HMSS]]
		+	* [[HaRPPS]]
	== Data and data models ==		== Data and data models ==
		+	[[Image:ESC site location.png|thumb|300px|ESC site location window]]
	=== Typical spatial extent of application  ===		=== Typical spatial extent of application  ===
		+	In the U.K. ESD-DSS is used for forest scenario planning, from the strategic national and regional scales to landscape-scale analyses through to suitability assessments on a site-by-site basis.
		+
	Web based tool operates at stand scale, ca 1-5 hectares, batch GIS tool has generated regional and national scenarios.		Web based tool operates at stand scale, ca 1-5 hectares, batch GIS tool has generated regional and national scenarios.
−
−	[[Category: stand level]]
−
−	=== Forest data input  ===
−	Location via OS GB six figure grid reference, e.g. NT090950. User also supplies an FC soil type (e.g. 1g, 4, 7bz), lithology/geology, vegetation (indicator plants), results from soil survey (soil texture, rooting depth, soil class (dry|wet) and humus form. More data increases the accuracy of the analysis.
	=== Type of information input from user (via GUI) ===		=== Type of information input from user (via GUI) ===
−	User selects one or more tree species for detailed analysis from an intermediate screen.	+	Users only have to input information about site grid reference, elevation, and soil features. Soil quality can be estimated approximately from some quick observations made of the soil and vegetation at the site, or can be predicted more accurately with a complete description of soil type, lithology, humus form and existing plants.
	== Models ==		== Models ==
		+	[[Image:ESC input window.png|thumb|300px|ESC input window]]
	=== Forest models ===		=== Forest models ===
		+	The site information is linked to ESC suitability models for 20 of the 25 NVC woodland communities (W1-W20) and 25 species of tree using a 'fuzzy membership function' approach. The fuzzy membership function describes the degree of suitability of the species or woodland community to each ESC site factor.
−	Species suitability models based on accumulated temperature (AT5), continentality (CT), wind exposure (DAMS - Detailed Aspect Method of Scoring), moisture deficit (MD), soil moisture regime (SMR) and soil nutrient regime (SNR).	+	Species suitability and yield prediction models are based on accumulated temperature (AT5), moisture deficit, continentality (CT), wind exposure (DAMS - Detailed Aspect Method of Scoring system, a function of elevation, topographic exposure, aspect, funneling effects and wind zone classification across Britain), moisture deficit (MD), soil moisture regime (SMR) and soil nutrient regime (SNR). From these six variables, climatic warmth (accumulated temperature) is assumed as the principal factor and from the remaining others only the most limiting factor may modify the site yield prediction <ref> REYNOLDS K.M., TWERY M., LEXER M.J., VACIK H., RAY D., SHAO G,. et BORGES J.G.: ''Decision Support Systems in Forest Management'' IN BURSTEIN F. et HOLSAPPLE C. W. (EDS.) (2008): ''Handbook on Decision Support Systems 2: Variations''. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 800 pp. </ref>.
−	Models to predict SNR from indicator plants (via Hill Ellenberg/Wilson scores) and SMR from soil (AWC, rooting depth)/site (MD) properties.	+	The link between biophysical factors and tree species suitability is defined by a set of knowledge based rules that represent an accord based on the combined discussion of a panel of forest scientists with knowledge and experience of the site-related growth potential of the 25 tree species presented. ESC site-yield estimates have been judged acceptable by many foresters and scientist at the ESC courses and demonstrations across a range of climatic zones and site types in the U.K. The model of Sitka spruce was also tested in the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clashindarroch_Forest Clashindarroch Forest], in Aberdeenshire (Scotland), showing a slightly underestimated site-yield approach<ref> RAY D., J.CLARE et A.MILNER (2001): ''An assessment od the ESC yield model for Sitka spruce'', Unpublished Forest Research Internal Report. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission</ref>.
	== Decision Support ==		== Decision Support ==
		+	[[Image:ESC_sitkaspruce_map.gif|thumb|300px|An example of the GIS application of ESC, predicting the effect of climate change on the productivity of Sitka Spruce]]
	=== Definition of management interventions ===		=== Definition of management interventions ===
	Species or NVC woodland choice.		Species or NVC woodland choice.
−	Prescription enumerating all selected possibilities at stand level, or thematic GIS layers (eg Oak or Sitka Spruce suitability in a defined area of interest).	+	Prescription enumerating all selected possibilities at stand level, or thematic GIS layers (e.g., Oak or Sitka Spruce suitability in a defined area of interest), even reaching national level.
	=== Typical temporal scale of application ===		=== Typical temporal scale of application ===
−	Has some support for future climate scenarios, baseline data is from 1961-1990.	+	Has support for future climate scenarios, being the baseline data from 1961-1990.
	=== Types of decisions supported  ===		=== Types of decisions supported  ===
Line 102:		Line 104:
	** collegial		** collegial
	**Bargaining / participative decision making		**Bargaining / participative decision making
−
−	=== Decision-making processes and models ===
−	*Logic modeling
−	*Operations research modeling
−	**Direct approaches
−	**Heuristic manipulation of simulation models
−	*Multiple criteria/ranking
−	*Other
	== Output ==		== Output ==
		+	[[Image:ESC species suitability.png|thumb|300px|ESC species suitability window]]
		+	[[Image:ESC yield class.png|thumb|300px|ESC yield classes window]]
	=== Types of  outputs ===		=== Types of  outputs ===
−	Stand version generates tables in HTML, thematic maps can be generated via a batch tool for visualisation in GIS, assuming suitable soil data is available.	+	Stand version generates tables showed on screen. Thematic maps can be generated via a batch tool for visualisation in GIS, assuming suitable soil data is available.
	=== Spatial analysis capabilities  ===		=== Spatial analysis capabilities  ===
−	* integrated capabilities	+	It has been implemented within ArcView 3.*™, and allows a lot of spatial analyses like in the image above showed.
−	* GIS links via batch tool. Limitations in this context due to availability of digital soil maps.	+
−	* provides standard data import/export formats	+
−	* allows spatial analysis, batch tool generates thematic layers	+
−		+
−	=== Abilities to address interdisciplinary, multi-scaled, and political issues  ===	+
−	Evaluate interactions between different basic information types (biophysical, economic, social). Produce coordinated results for decision makers operating at different spatial scales facilitate social negotiation and learning	+
Line 131:		Line 121:
	=== System requirements  ===		=== System requirements  ===
−	* Java library deployed on Linux and Windows. UI available at stand level via web, or batch system via command line.	+	* Microsoft® Windows® 3.1, 95, 98, or NT4
−	* Utilises many open source Java libraries, GRASS GIS or ArcGIS required for batch stage. Data currently managed in Oracle database or as raster files.	+	* 486 processor or better
−	* Beta trial	+	* 4 Mbytes free hard disk space
−		+	* 8 Mbytes RAM (minimum)
−	[[Category: multi-platform applications]]	+	* CD-ROM drive
		+	* Web tool only requires a web browser.
		+	* GRASS GIS or ArcView 3 required for batch stage. Data currently managed in Oracle database or as raster files.
		+	* Development status: ESC-DSS version 1.7 is available for purchasing. Version 2 is available on the Internet and is being updated.
	=== Architecture and major DSS components ===		=== Architecture and major DSS components ===
−	3 tier architecture ( UI, Models, Data)	+	ESC 1.7 was written in C++. It has been implemented within ArcView 3.*™ and GRASS.
−	Web based UI using JSP, HTML, CSS	+	ESC 2.0 is written in Java and has a web based UI using JSP, HTML, CSS.
−		+
−	Also desktop batch tool for GIS processing using Java.	+
−		+
−	Models are implemented in java. Three key models are species suitability, indicator plants and soil properties calculator.	+
−		+
−	Highly modular.	+
	Some simple web map services with Google Maps (not intended for operational use).		Some simple web map services with Google Maps (not intended for operational use).
−
−	Basic dataflow is location accesses site climate data, this and other user input data are then processed by the various models to generate outputs.
	=== Usage ===		=== Usage ===
Line 162:		Line 147:
	=== Documentation and support ===		=== Documentation and support ===
−	[http://www.forestresearch.gov.uk/website/publications.nsf/WebpubsbyISBN/0855384182 Bulletin 124] describes the method, and version 1.7 is well documented.	+	[http://www.forestresearch.gov.uk/website/publications.nsf/WebpubsbyISBN/0855384182 Bulletin 124] describes the method, and version 1.7 is well documented<ref>RAY D. (2001): ''A PC-based Decision Support System for British Forests. User’s Guide. Version 1.7''. Forestry Commission. ([http://www.forestresearch.gov.uk/pdf/manual.pdf/$FILE/manual.pdf pdf])</ref>. There is also a Field Survey Pack in order to help users to understand the ESC data requirements.
	Version 2.0 no formal training available to date. Support available via email.		Version 2.0 no formal training available to date. Support available via email.
		+
		+	Practical training courses on ESC-DSS are organised by Forestry Training Services (a part of the Forestry Commission) at various locations around the UK. Courses cover ESC survey techniques, soil and plant identification, and tree species and native woodland community suitability.
	=== Installation ===		=== Installation ===
−	* Prerequisite knowledge: Requires web browser. Server installation requires specialised skills and tools. Batch mode requires some configuration on host machine.	+	* Server installation requires J2EE server such as Tomcat or Oracle Application Server and an oracle database, and requires specialised skills and tools. Batch mode requires some configuration on host machine.
−		+	* Web tool requires web browser.
−	Web browser for stand version. GIS batch tool requires Java 1.4, Grass and related ESC datasets. A spatial version also exists based on ArcView/Spatial Analyst.	+
−		+
−	Server installation requires J2EE server such as Tomcat or Oracle Application Server and an oracle database.	+
	==References==		==References==
		+
		+	===Cited references===
		+	<references/>
	===External resources===		===External resources===
−	[http://www.eforestry.gov.uk/forestdss Forest Research Decision Support Portal] (note registration required)	+	* [http://www.forestresearch.gov.uk/esc ESC project website]
		+	* [http://www.eforestry.gov.uk/forestdss Forest Research Decision Support Portal] (note registration required)
		+	* [http://www.forestresearch.gov.uk/pdf/escfsp.pdf/$FILE/escfsp.pdf Ecological Site Classification v1.7 Field Survey Pack]

---

Latest revision as of 06:57, 14 October 2012

General System description

System name: Ecological Site Classification

Acronym: ESC

Brief overview

ESC is a PC-based DSS that supports a methodology for the evaluation of the suitability of different tree species and woodland communities as defined in the National Vegetation Classification (NVC) for Great Britain, and also predicting yield in the form of a site index, on the UK forest land.

Scope of the system

This tool encourages the decision makers on the election of a suitable forest species according to their site soil properties and climatic data, instead of selecting an inadequate species and then trying to modify site characteristics to make it more suitable. It also provides the suitability of the species according to the expected evolution of the climate, and predicts the potential yield in the form of a site index. The number of tree species considered is 25, and there are also 20 native woodland types.

System origin

• The system was developed in the 1990s but the origins can be traced to a publication by Anderson in the 1950s and earlier works that identified relationships between site quality and vegetation.
  It is developed by the Forestry Commission Research Agency, in a team led by Duncan Ray.
• ESC in its 1.7 version is available for purchasing at the ESC website for the price of 100£.
  Currently, version 2.0 is free to use at stand scale via web as part of the GB Forestry DSS tools.
• Both the U.K. Forestry Standard and the U.K. Woodland Assurance Scheme support the use of ESC as an objective methodology for both the software objectives above described^[1].

Support for specific issues

Species suitability and selection, biodiversity, and climate change effects on species suitability.

Support for specific thematic areas of a problem type

• Silvicultural
• Certification
• Conservation
• Restoration
• Development choices / land use zoning
• Policy/intervention alternatives

Capability to support decision making phases

• Intelligence

gives user detailed site analysis (climate and soil parameters).

• Design

provides site analysis in context of many themes.

• Choice

allows user to vary species choice, management options.

• Monitor

highlights risks which in theory could encourage monitoring.

Related systems

Describe (and/or link to) other systems related

• GB Forestry DSS
• Conifer Timber Quality Model
• EMIS
• Forest Gales
• HMSS
• HaRPPS

Data and data models

Typical spatial extent of application

In the U.K. ESD-DSS is used for forest scenario planning, from the strategic national and regional scales to landscape-scale analyses through to suitability assessments on a site-by-site basis.

Web based tool operates at stand scale, ca 1-5 hectares, batch GIS tool has generated regional and national scenarios.

Type of information input from user (via GUI)

Users only have to input information about site grid reference, elevation, and soil features. Soil quality can be estimated approximately from some quick observations made of the soil and vegetation at the site, or can be predicted more accurately with a complete description of soil type, lithology, humus form and existing plants.

Models

Forest models

The site information is linked to ESC suitability models for 20 of the 25 NVC woodland communities (W1-W20) and 25 species of tree using a 'fuzzy membership function' approach. The fuzzy membership function describes the degree of suitability of the species or woodland community to each ESC site factor.

Species suitability and yield prediction models are based on accumulated temperature (AT5), moisture deficit, continentality (CT), wind exposure (DAMS - Detailed Aspect Method of Scoring system, a function of elevation, topographic exposure, aspect, funneling effects and wind zone classification across Britain), moisture deficit (MD), soil moisture regime (SMR) and soil nutrient regime (SNR). From these six variables, climatic warmth (accumulated temperature) is assumed as the principal factor and from the remaining others only the most limiting factor may modify the site yield prediction ^[2].

The link between biophysical factors and tree species suitability is defined by a set of knowledge based rules that represent an accord based on the combined discussion of a panel of forest scientists with knowledge and experience of the site-related growth potential of the 25 tree species presented. ESC site-yield estimates have been judged acceptable by many foresters and scientist at the ESC courses and demonstrations across a range of climatic zones and site types in the U.K. The model of Sitka spruce was also tested in the Clashindarroch Forest, in Aberdeenshire (Scotland), showing a slightly underestimated site-yield approach^[3].

Decision Support

Definition of management interventions

Species or NVC woodland choice.

Prescription enumerating all selected possibilities at stand level, or thematic GIS layers (e.g., Oak or Sitka Spruce suitability in a defined area of interest), even reaching national level.

Typical temporal scale of application

Has support for future climate scenarios, being the baseline data from 1961-1990.

Types of decisions supported

• Management level
  • strategic decisions
  • administrative decisions
  • operating control decisions
• Management function
• planning decisions
  • organizing decisions
  • command decisions
  • control decisions
  • coordination decisions
• decision making situation
  • unilateral
  • collegial
  • Bargaining / participative decision making

Output

Types of outputs

Stand version generates tables showed on screen. Thematic maps can be generated via a batch tool for visualisation in GIS, assuming suitable soil data is available.

Spatial analysis capabilities

It has been implemented within ArcView 3.*™, and allows a lot of spatial analyses like in the image above showed.

System

System requirements

• Microsoft® Windows® 3.1, 95, 98, or NT4
• 486 processor or better
• 4 Mbytes free hard disk space
• 8 Mbytes RAM (minimum)
• CD-ROM drive
• Web tool only requires a web browser.
• GRASS GIS or ArcView 3 required for batch stage. Data currently managed in Oracle database or as raster files.
• Development status: ESC-DSS version 1.7 is available for purchasing. Version 2 is available on the Internet and is being updated.

Architecture and major DSS components

ESC 1.7 was written in C++. It has been implemented within ArcView 3.*™ and GRASS.

ESC 2.0 is written in Java and has a web based UI using JSP, HTML, CSS.

Some simple web map services with Google Maps (not intended for operational use).

Usage

Used in education, public and private sector forestry and research.

Computational limitations

Longer runtime to compute national datasets.

User interface

Web UI requires some understanding of soil types, OS grid references, reference to geological maps. Interpretation of information can be challenging so support is being developed.

Documentation and support

Bulletin 124 describes the method, and version 1.7 is well documented^[4]. There is also a Field Survey Pack in order to help users to understand the ESC data requirements.

Version 2.0 no formal training available to date. Support available via email.

Practical training courses on ESC-DSS are organised by Forestry Training Services (a part of the Forestry Commission) at various locations around the UK. Courses cover ESC survey techniques, soil and plant identification, and tree species and native woodland community suitability.

Installation

• Server installation requires J2EE server such as Tomcat or Oracle Application Server and an oracle database, and requires specialised skills and tools. Batch mode requires some configuration on host machine.
• Web tool requires web browser.

References

Cited references

1. ↑ REYNOLDS K.M., TWERY M., LEXER M.J., VACIK H., RAY D., SHAO G,. et BORGES J.G.: Decision Support Systems in Forest Management IN BURSTEIN F. et HOLSAPPLE C. W. (EDS.) (2008): Handbook on Decision Support Systems 2: Variations. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 800 pp.
2. ↑ REYNOLDS K.M., TWERY M., LEXER M.J., VACIK H., RAY D., SHAO G,. et BORGES J.G.: Decision Support Systems in Forest Management IN BURSTEIN F. et HOLSAPPLE C. W. (EDS.) (2008): Handbook on Decision Support Systems 2: Variations. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 800 pp.
3. ↑ RAY D., J.CLARE et A.MILNER (2001): An assessment od the ESC yield model for Sitka spruce, Unpublished Forest Research Internal Report. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission
4. ↑ RAY D. (2001): A PC-based Decision Support System for British Forests. User’s Guide. Version 1.7. Forestry Commission. (pdf)

External resources

• ESC project website
• Forest Research Decision Support Portal (note registration required)
• Ecological Site Classification v1.7 Field Survey Pack