Difference between revisions of "The analysis of the actor network interactions allowed to identify the criticalities to be solved in order to develop the collaborative process"
From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) m |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Lesson | {{Lesson | ||
| + | |ID=61 | ||
|Has statement=The analysis of the actor network interactions allowed to identify the criticalities to be solved in order to develop the collaborative process | |Has statement=The analysis of the actor network interactions allowed to identify the criticalities to be solved in order to develop the collaborative process | ||
|Has evidence=After the presentation of a draft Prezi diagram of the actor network the development team turned its attention to thinking of a series of systems and data to process of people who would need to use certain technologies to institutionalize the new approach. | |Has evidence=After the presentation of a draft Prezi diagram of the actor network the development team turned its attention to thinking of a series of systems and data to process of people who would need to use certain technologies to institutionalize the new approach. | ||
|Has consequences=The consequences are that the development process became more efficient by focusing attention to critical actors. | |Has consequences=The consequences are that the development process became more efficient by focusing attention to critical actors. | ||
|Has recommendation for action=It is important to use an actor network analysis not at the end of a process of institutionalization but during to gain focus. | |Has recommendation for action=It is important to use an actor network analysis not at the end of a process of institutionalization but during to gain focus. | ||
| − | |Has | + | |Has DSS development stage=Update |
|Has temporal scale=Long term (strategic) | |Has temporal scale=Long term (strategic) | ||
|Has spatial context=Spatial with neighbourhood interrelations | |Has spatial context=Spatial with neighbourhood interrelations | ||
| Line 17: | Line 18: | ||
|Has other relevant information=See case | |Has other relevant information=See case | ||
|Has working group theme=Participation | |Has working group theme=Participation | ||
| + | |Has DSS development=The analysis of the actor network interactions allowed to identify the criticalities to be solved in order to develop the collaborative process.Description of DSS development | ||
| + | |Has decision support techniques=The analysis of the actor network interactions allowed to identify the criticalities to be solved in order to develop the collaborative process.Decision support techniques | ||
| + | |Has knowledge management processes=The analysis of the actor network interactions allowed to identify the criticalities to be solved in order to develop the collaborative process.Knowledge management process | ||
| + | |Has support for social participation=The analysis of the actor network interactions allowed to identify the criticalities to be solved in order to develop the collaborative process.Support of social participation | ||
|Has actor perspective=Developer/Architect, Researcher | |Has actor perspective=Developer/Architect, Researcher | ||
}} | }} | ||
| + | [[Wg4::DSS development]] [[Wg4::institutionalization]] | ||
Latest revision as of 22:06, 22 September 2013
Lesson
| ID | 61 |
|---|---|
| Has statement | The analysis of the actor network interactions allowed to identify the criticalities to be solved in order to develop the collaborative process |
| Has evidence | After the presentation of a draft Prezi diagram of the actor network the development team turned its attention to thinking of a series of systems and data to process of people who would need to use certain technologies to institutionalize the new approach. |
| Has consequences | The consequences are that the development process became more efficient by focusing attention to critical actors. |
| Has recommendation for action | It is important to use an actor network analysis not at the end of a process of institutionalization but during to gain focus. |
| Has domain | |
| Has DSS development stage | Update |
| Has decision stage | |
| Has temporal scale | Long term (strategic) |
| Has spatial context | Spatial with neighbourhood interrelations |
| Has spatial scale | Forest level, Regional/national level |
| Has objectives dimension | Multiple objectives |
| Has goods and services dimension | Market services, Non-market services |
| Has decision making dimension | More than one decision maker/stakeholder |
| Has country | Germany |
| Has reference | See case |
| Has related DSS | |
| Has related case | Germany-Actor Network Theory to Understand Collaborative Decision Support Systems Development in Forest Management Practice |
| Has related lesson | The tracing of the actor network supported the identification of the key actors influencing the collaborative DSS implementation and institutionalization |
| Has other relevant information | See case |
| Has working group theme | Participation |
| Has DSS development | The analysis of the actor network interactions allowed to identify the criticalities to be solved in order to develop the collaborative process.Description of DSS development |
| Has decision support techniques | The analysis of the actor network interactions allowed to identify the criticalities to be solved in order to develop the collaborative process.Decision support techniques |
| Has knowledge management processes | The analysis of the actor network interactions allowed to identify the criticalities to be solved in order to develop the collaborative process.Knowledge management process |
| Has support for social participation | The analysis of the actor network interactions allowed to identify the criticalities to be solved in order to develop the collaborative process.Support of social participation |
| Has actor perspective | Developer/Architect, Researcher |
| Has researcher role | |
| Has user role | |
| Has developer role |
