Difference between revisions of "Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions"
From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "Stakeholder involvement in the development and use of DSS" to "Participation") |
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) (Forsys_add_wg_subthemes.py) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Lesson | {{Lesson | ||
| + | |ID=65 | ||
|Has statement=Involving local stakeholders in ranking the functions allowed to show them how their contribution can influence the management decisions. | |Has statement=Involving local stakeholders in ranking the functions allowed to show them how their contribution can influence the management decisions. | ||
|Has evidence=The public discussions called for a clarification of some concepts about which there were significant misunderstandings and preconceptions. | |Has evidence=The public discussions called for a clarification of some concepts about which there were significant misunderstandings and preconceptions. | ||
| Line 20: | Line 21: | ||
|Has knowledge management processes=Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions.Knowledge management process | |Has knowledge management processes=Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions.Knowledge management process | ||
|Has support for social participation=Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions.Support of social participation | |Has support for social participation=Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions.Support of social participation | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 02:36, 9 September 2013
Lesson
| ID | 65 |
|---|---|
| Has statement | Involving local stakeholders in ranking the functions allowed to show them how their contribution can influence the management decisions. |
| Has evidence | The public discussions called for a clarification of some concepts about which there were significant misunderstandings and preconceptions. |
| Has consequences | Each stakeholder can accept that his own point of view is not always the best. |
| Has recommendation for action | The different scenarios were presented to the stakeholders in a series of public meetings. |
| Has domain | Knowledge management, Participation |
| Has DSS development stage | |
| Has decision stage | |
| Has temporal scale | Long term (strategic), Medium term (tactical) |
| Has spatial context | Spatial with no neighbourhood interrelations |
| Has spatial scale | Stand level |
| Has objectives dimension | Multiple objectives |
| Has goods and services dimension | Market non-wood products, Market services, Market wood products, Non-market services |
| Has decision making dimension | More than one decision maker/stakeholder |
| Has country | Italy |
| Has reference | |
| Has related DSS | FORFUN |
| Has related case | Italy-Assessing forest functions at stand scale in a sub-regional forest plan in the Dolomites |
| Has related lesson | |
| Has other relevant information | |
| Has working group theme | Participation, Knowledge management |
| Has DSS development | Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions.Description of DSS development |
| Has decision support techniques | Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions.Decision support techniques |
| Has knowledge management processes | Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions.Knowledge management process |
| Has support for social participation | Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions.Support of social participation |
| Has actor perspective | Facilitator, User |
| Has researcher role | |
| Has user role | |
| Has developer role |
