Difference between revisions of "Esc"
(→Architecture and major DSS components) |
(→Computational limitations) |
||
Line 145: | Line 145: | ||
=== Computational limitations === | === Computational limitations === | ||
− | + | Longer runtime to compute national datasets. | |
=== User interface === | === User interface === |
Revision as of 14:14, 14 July 2009
General System description
System name: Ecological Site Classification Acronym: ESC
Brief overview
The system enables the appropriate choice of tree species or NVC woodland type on the basis of site climate and soil quality. Built into the tool are methods to assess soil quality from soil type and indicator plants.
Contents
Scope of the system
- tool encourages decision maker to discover new problems or opportunities by exposing to new information or results
- tool helps decision makers in recognizing upcoming problems for which solutions have been developed previously
- tool allows decision maker to actively create new knowledge when faced with a new problem and to develop novel solutions
- tool allows decision maker to capture knowledge, making it available to decision makers who are seeking solutions from previously solved problems
System origin
- The system was developed in the 1990s but the origins can be traced to a publication by Anderson in the 1950s and earlier works that identified relationships between site quality and vegetation.
- Development led by Duncan Ray.
- Currently free to use at stand scale via web.
- GIS versions applied in consultancy work.
- Some use in public/private sector and in education. Well known.
Support for specific issues
Is the system designed to take into account specific uses? E.g. guidance on ways to characterize biodiversity, economic-biodiversity tradeoff analysis methods, risk assessment methods, landscape analysis methods, timber harvest effects, climate change effects, biological effects (pests, pathogens, invasives), fire,...
Support for specific thematic areas of a problem type
- Silvicultural
- Certification
- Conservation
- Restoration
- Development choices / land use zoning
- Policy/intervention alternatives
- Sustainability impact assessment (SIA)
Capability to support decision making phases
- Intelligence (gives user detailed site analysis - climate and soil parameters)
- Design (provides site analysis in context of many themes)
- Choice (allows user to vary species choice, management options)
- Monitor (highlights risks which in theory could encourage monitoring)
Related systems
Describe (and/or link to) other systems related
- Conifer Timber Quality Model
- EMIS
- Forest Gales
- Harpps
Data and data models
Typical spatial extent of application
Web based tool operates at stand scale, ca 1-5 hectares, batch GIS tool has generated regional and national scenarios.
Forest data input
Location via OS GB six figure grid reference, eg NT090950. User also supplies an FC soil type (eg 1g, 4, 7bz), lithology/geology, vegetation (indicator plants), results from soil survey (soil texture, rooting depth, soil class (dry|wet) and humus form. More data increases the accuracy of the analysis.
Type of information input from user (via GUI)
User selects one or more tree species for detailed analysis from an intermediate screen.
Models
Forest models
Species suitability models based on AT5, CT, DAMS, MD, SMR, SNR.
Models to predict SNR from indicator plants (via Hill Ellenberg/Wilson scores) and SMR from soil (AWC, rooting depth)/site (MD) properties.
Social models
N/a
Decision Support
Definition of management interventions
Species or NVC woodland choice.
Prescription enumerating all selected possibilities at stand level, or thematic GIS layers (eg Oak or Sitka Spruce suitability in a defined area of interest).
Typical temporal scale of application
Has some support for future climate scenarios, baseline data is from 1961-1990.
Types of decisions supported
- Management level
- strategic decisions
- administrative decisions
- operating control decisions
- Management function
- planning decisions
- organizing decisions
- command decisions
- control decisions
- coordination decisions
- decision making situation
- unilateral
- collegial
- Bargaining / participative decision making
Decision-making processes and models
- Logic modeling
- Operations research modeling
- Direct approaches
- Heuristic manipulation of simulation models
- Multiple criteria/ranking
- Other
Output
Types of outputs
Stand version generates tables in HTML, thematic maps can be generated via a batch tool for visualisation in GIS, assuming suitable soil data is available.
Spatial analysis capabilities
- integrated capabilities
- GIS links via batch tool. Limitations in this context due to availability of digital soil maps.
- provides standard data import/export formats
- allows spatial analysis, batch tool generates thematic layers
Abilities to address interdisciplinary, multi-scaled, and political issues
Evaluate interactions between different basic information types (biophysical, economic, social). Produce coordinated results for decision makers operating at different spatial scales facilitate social negotiation and learning
System
System requirements
- Java library deployed on Linux and Windows. UI available at stand level via web, or batch system via command line.
- Utilises many open source Java libraries, GRASS GIS or ArcGIS required for batch stage. Data currently managed in Oracle database or as raster files.
- Beta trial
Architecture and major DSS components
3 tier architecture ( UI, Models, Data)
Web based UI using JSP, HTML, CSS
Also desktop batch tool for GIS processing using Java.
Models are implemented in java. Three key models are species suitability, indicator plants and soil properties calculator.
Highly modular.
Some simple web map services with Google Maps (not intended for operational use).
Basic dataflow is location accesses site climate data, this and other user input data are then processed by the various models to generate outputs.
Usage
Used in education, public and private sector forestry and research.
Computational limitations
Longer runtime to compute national datasets.
User interface
Web UI requires some understanding of soil types, OS grid references, reference to geological maps. Interpretation of information can be challenging so support is being developed.
Documentation and support
None to date. Support available via email.
Installation
- Prerequisite knowledge: Requires web browser. Server installation requires specialised skills and tools. Batch mode requires some configuration on host machine.
Web browser for stand version. GIS batch tool requires Java 1.4, Grass and related ESC datasets. A spatial version also exists based on ArcView/Spatial Analyst.
Server installation requires J2EE server such as Tomcat or Oracle Application Server and an oracle database.
References
Cited references
External resources
General System description
System name: Ecological Site Classification
Acronym: ESC
Brief overview
The system enables the appropriate choice of tree species or NVC woodland type on the basis of site climate and soil quality. Built into the tool are methods to assess soil quality from soil type and indicator plants.
Contents
1 General System description
1.1 Brief overview
1.2 Scope of the system
1.3 System origin
The system was developed in the 1990s but the origins can be traced to a publication by Anderson in the 1950s and earlier works that identified relationships between site quality and vegetation.
1.4 Support for specific issues
1.5 Support for specific thematic areas of a problem type
1.6 Capability to support decision making phases
1.7 Related systems
Establishment management information system (EMIS)
2 Data and data models
2.1 Typical spatial extent of application
ESC can be applied at stand level (1 hectare) via a web interface or landscape scape via a GIS batch tool, assuming suitable data exist.
2.2 Forest data input
The inputs are site location, which derives climate data from a database (and very coarse resolution soil data).
2.3 Type of information input from user (via GUI)
Ideally the user supplies the results of a soil survey and on site vegetation.
3 Models
3.1 Forest models
Uses species suitability models and various tools to calculate soil properties from plants and/or soil profile information.
3.2 Social models
n/a
4 Decision Support
4.1 Typical temporal scale of application
Has limited capability to project suitability indexes into future climates to 2080.
4.2 Types of decisions supported
Planning decisions eg
Tree species to plant on site. Site type/quality assessments.
4.3 Decision-making processes and models
5 Output
5.1 Types of outputs
Species suitability responses against climate and soil factors.
5.2 Spatial analysis capabilities
GIS visualisation available via offline batch tool.
5.3 Abilities to address interdisciplinary, multi-scaled, and political issues
Can identify sites for restoration to pre afforestation status.
6 System 6.1 System requirements
Stand tool - user requires web browser ( tested on IE6 and Firefox )
6.2 Architecture and major DSS components
Three tier architecture facilitating desktop or server deployment. Key components are web UI, batch UI, model codes and data.
6.3 Usage
Utilised by forest planners in public/private sector, students and researchers.
6.4 Computational limitations
Very light to run, but can take sometime to process large quantites of data.
6.5 User interface
Stand tool uses HTML/CSS. Command line batch mode to generate GIS results and GIS extension to ArcView.
6.6 Documentation and support
In development, support via FC training courses and bulletin.
6.7 Installation
Web browser for stand version. GIS batch tool requires Java 1.4, Grass and related ESC datasets. A spatial version also exists based on ArcView/Spatial Analyst.
Server installation requires J2EE server such as Tomcat or Oracle Application Server and an oracle database.