Difference between revisions of "SIPAFIT"
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
|User profile=public land managers (i.e. state-owned, federal, cantonal, communal forests) | |User profile=public land managers (i.e. state-owned, federal, cantonal, communal forests) | ||
|Initial deployment effort=<= 1 day | |Initial deployment effort=<= 1 day | ||
| − | |Adaptation effort= | + | |Adaptation effort=parameterized by the user |
|Maintenance organization=Forest Service of Trentino Province, CRA-MPF (Trento, Italy) | |Maintenance organization=Forest Service of Trentino Province, CRA-MPF (Trento, Italy) | ||
|User support organization= Forest Service of Trentino Province, CRA-MPF (Trento, Italy) | |User support organization= Forest Service of Trentino Province, CRA-MPF (Trento, Italy) | ||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
|Optimisation algorithm=nonlinear programming | |Optimisation algorithm=nonlinear programming | ||
|MCDM methods= Analytical Network Process (ANP) | |MCDM methods= Analytical Network Process (ANP) | ||
| − | | | + | |Knowledge management methods=workflow, database, best practises/lessons learned, |
|Forest models= yield models | |Forest models= yield models | ||
|Ecological models=N/A | |Ecological models=N/A | ||
| Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
|Integrated KM techniques to analyze and apply knowledge= | |Integrated KM techniques to analyze and apply knowledge= | ||
|KM tools used during the development of the DSS=Workflow, Database, Best Practices | |KM tools used during the development of the DSS=Workflow, Database, Best Practices | ||
| − | |Kind of | + | |Kind of knowledge and information processed=Explicit Knowledge |
}} | }} | ||
{{DSS description, Support for participatory planning | {{DSS description, Support for participatory planning | ||
| Line 147: | Line 147: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Creating the sample network | |Creating the sample network | ||
| − | |SAMSIZE outputs, geodatabase, .LAUNCHER | + | |SAMSIZE outputs, geodatabase, .LAUNCHER SW tool (Model Builder and Python in ArcGIS environment). |
|It is possible to choose between random or systematic (on a squared grid) sample distribution, with different density among the strata | |It is possible to choose between random or systematic (on a squared grid) sample distribution, with different density among the strata | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Ground inventory | |Ground inventory | ||
| − | |.LAUNCHER outputs, RELASKOPE mobileGIS | + | |.LAUNCHER outputs, RELASKOPE mobileGIS SW (VBscript and applet programming in ESRI Arcpad environment). |
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Inventory data control and processing | |Inventory data control and processing | ||
| − | |.CONTROL and .PROCESS | + | |.CONTROL and .PROCESS SW tools (VBA in Excel/Access environment) |
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Result reporting | |Result reporting | ||
| − | |.REPORT | + | |.REPORT SW tool (VBA in Access environment); thematic maps in vector and raster format |
| | | | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 177: | Line 177: | ||
== Support for specific issues == | == Support for specific issues == | ||
| − | SIPAFIT support | + | SIPAFIT support consultants in field surveys, allowing an effective georeferenced description of the main (both dendroauxometric and structural) forest parameters, it support forest managers in inventory data control and processing and it support forest manager in result reporting. |
== Support for specific thematic areas of a problem type == | == Support for specific thematic areas of a problem type == | ||
| Line 184: | Line 184: | ||
== Capability to support decision making phases == | == Capability to support decision making phases == | ||
| − | * Intelligence: the system | + | * Intelligence: the system uses a fully automatic, congruent, progressive and recordable procedure. |
* Design: forest planner input data in the inventory phase | * Design: forest planner input data in the inventory phase | ||
* Choice: results give quantitative dendroauxometric parameters | * Choice: results give quantitative dendroauxometric parameters | ||
| Line 196: | Line 196: | ||
== Typical spatial extent of application == | == Typical spatial extent of application == | ||
The typical spatial extent of application is the forest management plan. | The typical spatial extent of application is the forest management plan. | ||
| − | The spatial unit for the output depends on what extension data input refer (the forest subjected to the planning process). Definitely we can say that the typical spatial extent of application is the single | + | The spatial unit for the output depends on what extension data input refer (the forest subjected to the planning process). Definitely we can say that the typical spatial extent of application is the single real property scale. |
== Forest data input == | == Forest data input == | ||
| − | The forest data input are | + | The forest data input are dendrometric parameters collected during the field surveys (inventory phase). |
== Type of information input from user (via GUI) == | == Type of information input from user (via GUI) == | ||
| Line 220: | Line 220: | ||
== Types of decisions supported == | == Types of decisions supported == | ||
| − | * Management and | + | * Management and silvicultural actions. |
* Strategic decisions. | * Strategic decisions. | ||
* Operating control decisions. | * Operating control decisions. | ||
Revision as of 23:01, 10 May 2012
Template:DSS description, Identification Template:DSS description, FORSYS problem types classification Template:DSS description, Utilisation scope Template:DSS description, Functional description Template:DSS description, Models and techniques to support decision making Template:DSS description, Support for knowledge management processes Template:DSS description, Support for participatory planning Template:DSS description, Development process Template:DSS description, IT environment & IT requirements Template:DSS description, Commercial information
Contents
- 1 General System description
- 2 Brief overview
- 3 Scope of the system
- 4 System origin
- 5 Support for specific issues
- 6 Support for specific thematic areas of a problem type
- 7 Capability to support decision making phases
- 8 Related systems
- 9 Typical spatial extent of application
- 10 Forest data input
- 11 Type of information input from user (via GUI)
- 12 Forest models
- 13 Social models
- 14 Definition of management interventions
- 15 Typical temporal scale of application
- 16 Types of decisions supported
- 17 Decision-making processes and models
- 18 Types of outputs
- 19 Spatial analysis capabilities
- 20 Abilities to address interdisciplinary, multi-scaled, and political issues
- 21 System requirements
- 22 Architecture and major DSS components
- 23 Usage
- 24 Computational limitations
- 25 User interface
- 26 Documentation and support
- 27 Installation
- 28 Cited references
- 29 External resources
General System description
System name: Sistema Informativo Provinciale per l’Assestamento Forestale in Trentino
Acronym: SIPAFIT
Brief overview
SIPAFIT is the forest management system used by the Forest Service of Trentino Province articulated in several sub-systems (and relative instruments and tools) which support the different steps of the management decision chain. In the following table the sub-systems - which support the different steps of the management decision chain – are described.
| Forest management phase | SIPAFIT sub-system | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Correction of forest and forest compartments boundaries | Geodatabase, mobileGIS software | Using sampling methods, it is essential a precise knowledge of the extension and position of the forest elements (compartments, stands…). |
| Production of the “forest unit” map | Geodatabase, mobileGIS software, LiDAR (CHM) data, digital orthophotos, forest type map, other ancillary layers | This phase is essential to organize a standardized description of the forest and to build the strata on which the sample network will be launched |
| Dimensioning the sample size | SAMSIZE (VBA in Excel/Access environment), forest strata map, data entry by the user | This tool allows to produce a proper distribution of the sample among the strata according to the expected uncertainties. It is possible to simulate different sampling scenarios, in terms of forest structure variability and complexity, and exploitation temporal proximity |
| Creating the sample network | SAMSIZE outputs, geodatabase, .LAUNCHER SW tool (Model Builder and Python in ArcGIS environment). | It is possible to choose between random or systematic (on a squared grid) sample distribution, with different density among the strata |
| Ground inventory | .LAUNCHER outputs, RELASKOPE mobileGIS SW (VBscript and applet programming in ESRI Arcpad environment). | |
| Inventory data control and processing | .CONTROL and .PROCESS SW tools (VBA in Excel/Access environment) | |
| Result reporting | .REPORT SW tool (VBA in Access environment); thematic maps in vector and raster format |
Scope of the system
SIPAFIT integrates statistical and sampling methods with computer and technological resources allowing an effective georeferenced description of the main (both dendroauxometric and structural) forest parameters of the managed forest stands. SIPAF allows simulation of different scenarios in terms of forest stratification, inventory strategies and sampling intensity.
System origin
Forest administration of the Province of Trento (North-Eastern Italian Alps, 400,000 ha of forest area, more than 50% of the province total area) has recently changed its inventory system from total census (full callipering, which had been progressively reduced in area, for cost reasons) to sampling methods (Scrinzi et al., 2011). Besides, the needs for a modern and efficient forest management require more information about an overall “description” of the forest, but at the same time can tolerate less accuracy in timber production estimates. A comprehensive system was developed to support the forest managers, the forest owners and the consultants (professionals who perform forest management plans), in each step of the forest planning. SIPAF and its sub-systems were initially tested on a pilot management plan in 2009, and then had several changes and improvements to tackle the problems met. A total of 12 experts were involved in system design, implementation and testing (5 researchers, 4 foresters from the Forest Service and 3 consultants involved in plan preparation). During this first period of application, a number of meetings and workshops has been realized with all the users of the system. The tools have been operatively used since 2009 by the forest managers of Forest Service in the Trentino Province, and therefore their users have extended from researchers to consultants and to other stakeholders (i.e. managers and technicians of the municipalities which are the public forest owners).
Support for specific issues
SIPAFIT support consultants in field surveys, allowing an effective georeferenced description of the main (both dendroauxometric and structural) forest parameters, it support forest managers in inventory data control and processing and it support forest manager in result reporting.
Support for specific thematic areas of a problem type
- Forest planning.
- Territorial planning.
Capability to support decision making phases
- Intelligence: the system uses a fully automatic, congruent, progressive and recordable procedure.
- Design: forest planner input data in the inventory phase
- Choice: results give quantitative dendroauxometric parameters
- Monitor: a field test is implemented by the forest managers in the forest surveyed by the consultants.
Related systems
Data and data models
Typical spatial extent of application
The typical spatial extent of application is the forest management plan. The spatial unit for the output depends on what extension data input refer (the forest subjected to the planning process). Definitely we can say that the typical spatial extent of application is the single real property scale.
Forest data input
The forest data input are dendrometric parameters collected during the field surveys (inventory phase).
Type of information input from user (via GUI)
Geographic data are input from user.
Models
Forest models
The forest models are yield models in particular volume estimation models used in the forest management planning of Trentino Forest Service.
Social models
The forest owners are public institutions, such as municipalities, administrations that manage goods of civic use, forest agencies, so they non-industrial forest owners and their goal is the land and forest protection this means that the forest exploitation is made in respect of forestry.
Decision Support
Definition of management interventions
The definition of management interventions is made by the consultants who perform the forest plan in agreement with the forest owner.
Typical temporal scale of application
Planning and operational level.
Types of decisions supported
- Management and silvicultural actions.
- Strategic decisions.
- Operating control decisions.
Decision-making processes and models
SIPAFIT is a system in all respects and the results that outcome hierarchy from one sub-system are preparatory for the sub-system that follows, so each element is not considered to be independent of all the others, therefore the decision criteria are accordingly not considered to be independent of one another, and the alternatives are not considered to be independent of the decision criteria and of each other.
Output
Types of outputs
The outputs of SIPAFIT are quantitative parameters that described the forest from the dendrometric and productive point of view. The outputs are also thematic maps built by GIS.
Spatial analysis capabilities
SIPAFIT runs in a spatial context with no neighbourhood interrelations and at forest level as spatial scale (de facto the spatial scale corresponds to the extension of forest owned by the public administration).
Abilities to address interdisciplinary, multi-scaled, and political issues
At the moment SIPAFIT addresses specifically forestry issues, it produces results for decision makers operating at the unique forest spatial scale. It facilitates negotiation among the forest owner, the Trentino Forest Service and the consultants who performed the forest plan.
System
System requirements
SIPAFIT runs on Microsoft Windows environment, and it requires MS Access and ESRI GIS for the geographic data processing.
Architecture and major DSS components
SIPAFIT is a modular system.
Usage
Forest management and planning.
Computational limitations
No limitations.
User interface
The user interface is different according to the sub-system: in some cases the interface is typical of the ESRI GIS environment (ESRI Arcpad environment), in some cases the interface are Access tables that the user ha to fill, in some cases the interface are MS Excel table.
Documentation and support
The whole description of the characteristics, functioning and usage of SIPAFIT and its sub-system are described in Scrinzi et al., 2011.
Installation
The installation is different in relation to the sub-system.
References
Cited references
Scrinzi G., Clementele F., Colle G., Farruggia C., Floris A., Torresan C., 2011. L’inventario dendrometrico nella nuova pianificazione forestale aziendale trentina (NPFAT). © 2011 Provincia Autonoma di Trento – Servizio Foreste e Fauna. ISBN 978-88-7702-322-3.
External resources
- Wolynski, A., Zanin, M., Scrinzi, G. 2009. Revisione della pianificazione forestale in Trentino a cinquant’anni dall’adozione della selvicoltura naturalistica. Atti del Terzo Congresso Nazionale di Selvicoltura. Taormina (ME), 16-19 Ottobre 2008. Accademia Italiana di Scienze Forestali, Firenze, p. 928-932.
- Colle G, Clementel F, Floris A, Marzullo L, Scrinzi G, 2010. Strumenti evoluti di mobile GIS a supporto del monitoraggio e della pianificazione forestale. Forest@ 7: 148-157 [online: 2010-07-30] URL: http://www.sisef.it/forest@/?doi=10.3832/efor0622-007.
- Scrinzi G., Clementel F., Colle G., Floris A., Galvagni D., Gecele S., Marzullo L., 2008 - Soluzioni statistico-matematiche, informatiche e tecnologie per la nuova pianificazione forestale aziendale trentina. III Congresso Nazionale di Selvicoltura, Taormina 15-18 ottobre 2008. Accademia Italiana di Scienze Forestali, Firenze, p. 915-920.
