Difference between revisions of "Case Study Committee Workplan"

From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: require(): Unable to allocate memory for pool. in /data/home/fp0804/www/wiki/includes/AutoLoader.php on line 1191
m
m
Line 4: Line 4:
 
Here are some ideas for your feedback:
 
Here are some ideas for your feedback:
  
Desired result of Nov 2011 case study activities
+
==Desired result of Nov 2011 case study activities==
 
* Agreement on the outline of a common plan for conducting the case studies, including decisions on purposes, methods (case definition, sampling, analysis), and reporting results
 
* Agreement on the outline of a common plan for conducting the case studies, including decisions on purposes, methods (case definition, sampling, analysis), and reporting results
  
'''What should the case study STC do before, at, and after the November meeting? '''
+
 
 +
==What should the case study STC do before, at, and after the November meeting?==
  
 
Before the Nov meeting
 
Before the Nov meeting
Line 28: Line 29:
 
* Answer questions, resolve issues
 
* Answer questions, resolve issues
  
 +
==Case study time at meeting==
 
'''How to maneuver the November meeting discussions/work if we are something like 35 persons with 2 rather big rooms at our disposal (and perhaps smaller groups can find some space in the surroundings as well)? Having a common discussion all along might be difficult (or not so productive). Depending on how we divide the sessions, one may start thinking about how to compose the guidelines out of your material.'''
 
'''How to maneuver the November meeting discussions/work if we are something like 35 persons with 2 rather big rooms at our disposal (and perhaps smaller groups can find some space in the surroundings as well)? Having a common discussion all along might be difficult (or not so productive). Depending on how we divide the sessions, one may start thinking about how to compose the guidelines out of your material.'''
  
Here are some ideas for your feedback:
 
 
*[30 minutes] begin with a brief common presentation and discussion on progress to date. Outline tasks for meeting subgroups (overall task is to build more details on framework for conducting case studies). Answer any general questions.
 
*[30 minutes] begin with a brief common presentation and discussion on progress to date. Outline tasks for meeting subgroups (overall task is to build more details on framework for conducting case studies). Answer any general questions.
 
*[1.5 hours] Break into ~4 subgroups with ~8 people each, trying to get even representation from each WG in each, including one of us in each (because it looks like case studies have already been discussed by each WG in Greece, now we could try to synthesize across WGs). All groups would have the same assignment: to review the current state of the case study framework, provide feedback, and develop more detail.
 
*[1.5 hours] Break into ~4 subgroups with ~8 people each, trying to get even representation from each WG in each, including one of us in each (because it looks like case studies have already been discussed by each WG in Greece, now we could try to synthesize across WGs). All groups would have the same assignment: to review the current state of the case study framework, provide feedback, and develop more detail.
 
*[30 min] Groups would report a summary of their suggestions back to whole group
 
*[30 min] Groups would report a summary of their suggestions back to whole group
 
*[30 min] Synthesis discussion
 
*[30 min] Synthesis discussion

Revision as of 06:51, 4 October 2011


Here are some ideas for your feedback:

Desired result of Nov 2011 case study activities

  • Agreement on the outline of a common plan for conducting the case studies, including decisions on purposes, methods (case definition, sampling, analysis), and reporting results


What should the case study STC do before, at, and after the November meeting?

Before the Nov meeting

  • Plan the Nov 2011 case study activities
  • Develop two (or more) documents:
  • Gather further information on case studies
    • Existing forest DSS case study literature
    • Other relevant literature (methods, etc)

At Nov meeting

  • Give case study introductory presentation
  • Lead each subgroup on assigned task

After Nov meeting

  • Synthesize information into case study guidelines
  • Distribute the guidelines to the Forsys network
  • Track progress of countries in Forsys network
  • Answer questions, resolve issues

Case study time at meeting

How to maneuver the November meeting discussions/work if we are something like 35 persons with 2 rather big rooms at our disposal (and perhaps smaller groups can find some space in the surroundings as well)? Having a common discussion all along might be difficult (or not so productive). Depending on how we divide the sessions, one may start thinking about how to compose the guidelines out of your material.

  • [30 minutes] begin with a brief common presentation and discussion on progress to date. Outline tasks for meeting subgroups (overall task is to build more details on framework for conducting case studies). Answer any general questions.
  • [1.5 hours] Break into ~4 subgroups with ~8 people each, trying to get even representation from each WG in each, including one of us in each (because it looks like case studies have already been discussed by each WG in Greece, now we could try to synthesize across WGs). All groups would have the same assignment: to review the current state of the case study framework, provide feedback, and develop more detail.
  • [30 min] Groups would report a summary of their suggestions back to whole group
  • [30 min] Synthesis discussion