Difference between revisions of "PYL.Decision support techniques"
From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
m (1 revision: Import from testwiki) |
|
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 15:49, 2 April 2013
Decision support techniques
| Has forest model | N/A |
|---|---|
| Has ecological model | N/A |
| Has social model | Location-specific stakeholder values, Monetary values of non-market products and services |
| Has other models | |
| Has MCDM method | Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Other discrete MDCM, Other multi-agent MCDM |
| Has optimisation package | N/A |
| Has optimisation algorithm | |
| Has risk evaluation | "user defined" is not in the list of possible values (N/A, Classical statistics, Climate change, Conflict management, Fire behaviour, Natural hazards, Pest management, Production costs, Storm behaviour, Timber prices, User defined, Wind hazard) for this property. |
| Has uncertainty evaluation | Sensivity analysis |
| Has planning scenario | GISCAME is made for either mulit-participant scenario design or - by use of the CA - for scenario design depending from integrative transition probabilities for which starting conditions, proximities, environmental basics and stakeholder opinion are applied. |
| Has other methods |
- has related DSS:PYL
GISCAME makes use of modelled results, but does not include models for reasons of a comfortable user performance in webGIS environment. Optimization algorithm for spatial planning are excluded as an optimization would request for clear optimization criteria which do not exist at regional scale. Focus is therefore on multiple scenario testing and feed-back in decision processes and not on decision making.
