Difference between revisions of "Analysis at the landscape level allowed the integration of concerns about multiple resources as well"
From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) (Seans automated transfer) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 19:31, 2 May 2013
Lesson
| ID | |
|---|---|
| Has statement | Analysis at the landscape level allowed the integration of concerns about multiple resources as well as unique restoration opportunities. |
| Has evidence | |
| Has consequences | |
| Has recommendation for action | |
| Has domain | Application of the DSS |
| Has DSS development stage | |
| Has decision stage | |
| Has temporal scale | |
| Has spatial context | |
| Has spatial scale | Regional/national level |
| Has objectives dimension | Multiple objectives |
| Has goods and services dimension | Market wood products, Non-market services |
| Has decision making dimension | |
| Has country | |
| Has reference | |
| Has related DSS | |
| Has related case | United States-The restoration strategy of the dry and mesic landscape in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest |
| Has related lesson | |
| Has other relevant information | |
| Has working group theme | Models & techniques, Knowledge management |
| Has DSS development | Analysis at the landscape level allowed the integration of concerns about multiple resources as well.Description of DSS development |
| Has decision support techniques | Analysis at the landscape level allowed the integration of concerns about multiple resources as well.Decision support techniques |
| Has knowledge management processes | Analysis at the landscape level allowed the integration of concerns about multiple resources as well.Knowledge management process |
| Has support for social participation | Analysis at the landscape level allowed the integration of concerns about multiple resources as well.Support of social participation |
| Has actor perspective | Facilitator |
| Has researcher role | |
| Has user role | |
| Has developer role |
