Difference between revisions of "Use of the DSS has been considered successful by the participating organizations, even though it has"
From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) (Seans automated transfer) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 19:32, 2 May 2013
Lesson
| ID | |
|---|---|
| Has statement | Use of the DSS has been considered successful by the participating organizations, even though it has not affected decision making in any obvious way |
| Has evidence | |
| Has consequences | |
| Has recommendation for action | |
| Has domain | Application of the DSS |
| Has DSS development stage | |
| Has decision stage | choice |
| Has temporal scale | |
| Has spatial context | |
| Has spatial scale | |
| Has objectives dimension | |
| Has goods and services dimension | |
| Has decision making dimension | |
| Has country | |
| Has reference | |
| Has related DSS | EMDS |
| Has related case | United States-Watershed Condition Assessment for the Northwest Forest Plan |
| Has related lesson | |
| Has other relevant information | |
| Has working group theme | Participation, Knowledge management |
| Has DSS development | Use of the DSS has been considered successful by the participating organizations, even though it has.Description of DSS development |
| Has decision support techniques | Use of the DSS has been considered successful by the participating organizations, even though it has.Decision support techniques |
| Has knowledge management processes | Use of the DSS has been considered successful by the participating organizations, even though it has.Knowledge management process |
| Has support for social participation | Use of the DSS has been considered successful by the participating organizations, even though it has.Support of social participation |
| Has actor perspective | Facilitator |
| Has researcher role | |
| Has user role | |
| Has developer role |
