Difference between revisions of "Need of a moderator function"
From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) (Seans automated transfer) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 19:33, 2 May 2013
Lesson
ID | |
---|---|
Has statement | Need of a moderator function - "the user as such" does per se not exist, but by doing a participatory development of a tool, trust in its results is created by "consumers" of its analytical results, but the researcher as such should mostly do the analysis him- or herself |
Has evidence | |
Has consequences | |
Has recommendation for action | |
Has domain | |
Has DSS development stage | |
Has decision stage | |
Has temporal scale | Long term (strategic) |
Has spatial context | Spatial with neighbourhood interrelations |
Has spatial scale | Regional/national level |
Has objectives dimension | Multiple objectives |
Has goods and services dimension | Market services, Non-market services |
Has decision making dimension | More than one decision maker/stakeholder |
Has country | Germany |
Has reference | |
Has related DSS | PYL |
Has related case | Upper Elbe Valley / Eastern Ore Mts. |
Has related lesson | |
Has other relevant information | |
Has working group theme | Participation |
Has DSS development | |
Has decision support techniques | |
Has knowledge management processes | |
Has support for social participation | |
Has actor perspective | |
Has researcher role | |
Has user role | |
Has developer role |