Need of a moderator function
From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
Revision as of 04:57, 29 July 2013 by SeanGordon (Talk | contribs)
Lesson
| ID | |
|---|---|
| Has statement | Need of a moderator function - "the user as such" does per se not exist, but by doing a participatory development of a tool, trust in its results is created by "consumers" of its analytical results, but the researcher as such should mostly do the analysis him- or herself |
| Has evidence | |
| Has consequences | |
| Has recommendation for action | |
| Has domain | Application of the DSS, Stakeholder involvement in the development and use of DSS |
| Has DSS development stage | |
| Has decision stage | |
| Has temporal scale | Long term (strategic) |
| Has spatial context | Spatial with neighbourhood interrelations |
| Has spatial scale | Regional/national level |
| Has objectives dimension | Multiple objectives |
| Has goods and services dimension | Market services, Non-market services |
| Has decision making dimension | More than one decision maker/stakeholder |
| Has country | Germany |
| Has reference | |
| Has related DSS | PYL |
| Has related case | Germany-Using GISCAME to test alternative land-use scenarios under climate change in the Upper Elbe Valley |
| Has related lesson | |
| Has other relevant information | |
| Has working group theme | Participation |
| Has DSS development | |
| Has decision support techniques | |
| Has knowledge management processes | |
| Has support for social participation | |
| Has actor perspective | Facilitator, User |
| Has researcher role | |
| Has user role | |
| Has developer role |
