Wanted pages

From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
Jump to: navigation, search

Showing below up to 50 results starting with #401.

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

  1. Peter I of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  2. Stakeholder involvement.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  3. The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  4. DSS helped document and apply decision criteria consistently, and therefore produced a more.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  5. IFFIRES‏‎ (1 link)
  6. System costs (personnel expenditure‏‎ (1 link)
  7. The design process was rather ad-hoc and sequential, as a result of step-wise funding becoming.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  8. United States-The restoration strategy of the dry and mesic landscape in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  9. Supports Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDA by AHP and SMART)‏‎ (1 link)
  10. Students studying forest management planning procedures and processes were very useful ‘guinea pigs’.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  11. Question: Is it relevant to consider an adequate programming environment and programming tools for the implementation?‏‎ (1 link)
  12. TUZTER‏‎ (1 link)
  13. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna‏‎ (1 link)
  14. Template:DSS description, Technological architecture, integration with other systems‏‎ (1 link)
  15. Operational aspects of the system should be enhanced.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  16. Visualization of the preliminary actor network made the people explicity include the DSS in a planning process.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  17. The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  18. A more informative output should be generated with clear graphs and maps indicating long-term.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  19. Embedding a DSS in a GIS software allows obtaining information at different spatial scales using the.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  20. An optimisation module comparing alternative scenarios based on multi-criteria analysis should be.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  21. House of Braganza-Saxe-Coburg and Gotha‏‎ (1 link)
  22. Deer‏‎ (1 link)
  23. SIGFOR.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  24. Model building was rapid, it was assembling the data that took by far the most time.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  25. Pareto Frontier Techniques are useful for multi-criteria forest management planning.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  26. Plenty‏‎ (1 link)
  27. As the core of forest DSS are models describing the development of trees and stands (growth and.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  28. SIMPLOT‏‎ (1 link)
  29. End user engagement throughout the development and deployment cycle is very important.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  30. Alterra‏‎ (1 link)
  31. Spain-Sustainable Management of Mediterranean Forest: Valencian Community Case.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  32. DSS allowed to explain better some technical concepts to non-professional stakeholders.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  33. Sp.t‏‎ (1 link)
  34. Ministerium für Umwelt‏‎ (1 link)
  35. EVH‏‎ (1 link)
  36. Lesson Handbook‏‎ (1 link)
  37. United States-The forest plan revision process in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  38. DSS for planning of forest operations technology‏‎ (1 link)
  39. Enlarged decision space.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  40. Group participation with knowledgeable people is a good way to ensure that the decision hierarchy is.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  41. PractiSFM.Software‏‎ (1 link)
  42. Forest managers have to analyze how their forest management interventions effect the landscape.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  43. Università della Tuscia - Università del Molise‏‎ (1 link)
  44. New Zealand-Modular Forest Management DSS in NZ.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  45. The ProgettoBosco working methodology, based on cooperation, successive approximations and.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  46. Need for new models for the later use of a tool.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  47. Luís I of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  48. The fact that ProgettoBosco is conceived according to the criteria and indicators of sustainable.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  49. The DSS usage enabled the planning team to measure the achievement of the restoration goals.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  50. Spain-An agro-ecological Decision Support Systems for evaluting soil under scenarios of global change.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)