Wanted pages

From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
Jump to: navigation, search

Showing below up to 50 results starting with #501.

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

  1. The use of the DSS improved communication among the planning team by providing a framework of the.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  2. The analysis of the actor network interactions allowed to identify the criticalities to be solved in order to develop the collaborative process.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  3. Will be further developed include participatory planning‏‎ (1 link)
  4. The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  5. VDDT-Path.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  6. New Zealand-Modular Forest Management DSS in NZ.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  7. National Game Inventory‏‎ (1 link)
  8. The activation of an iterative process through periodical meetings permitted to all the stakeholders.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  9. Manuel II of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  10. Portugal-Tactical/operational forest planning in a Portuguese integrated Pulp and Paper Company.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  11. The fact that ProgettoBosco is conceived according to the criteria and indicators of sustainable.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  12. Spain-An agro-ecological Decision Support Systems for evaluting soil under scenarios of global change.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  13. Results are always strongly dependent on the quality of the underlying data.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  14. End user engagement throughout the development and deployment cycle is very important.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  15. Spain-Sustainable Management of Mediterranean Forest: Valencian Community Case.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  16. Running the DSS required special skills, therefore the local planning team required considerable.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  17. DSS allowed to explain better some technical concepts to non-professional stakeholders.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  18. Und Fursten‏‎ (1 link)
  19. The DSS usage enabled the planning team to measure the achievement of the restoration goals.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  20. OpTimber-LP.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  21. Windthrow risk model‏‎ (1 link)
  22. United States-The forest plan revision process in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  23. EFI‏‎ (1 link)
  24. Enlarged decision space.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  25. FORPLAN‏‎ (1 link)
  26. T2.s‏‎ (1 link)
  27. PractiSFM.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  28. ManForFirE‏‎ (1 link)
  29. Forest managers have to analyze how their forest management interventions effect the landscape.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  30. Template:DSS description, Documentation‏‎ (1 link)
  31. Stuff‏‎ (1 link)
  32. Beatrice of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  33. Lack of proper documentation and support services (manual, website, etc) can severely limit the.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  34. Philip II of Spain‏‎ (1 link)
  35. SIPAFIT can act sometimes as a referee to settle arguments among experts, users and stakeholders.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  36. Italy-Assessing forest functions at stand scale in a sub-regional forest plan in the Dolomites.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  37. GISCAME is made for either mulit-participant scenario design or - by use of the CA - for scenario design depending from integrative transition probabilities for which starting conditions‏‎ (1 link)
  38. The development of large and enduring systems requires a long term approach.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  39. Sweden-The development and introduction of versatile DSS in Sweden.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  40. Despite the widely use and acceptance of the DSS there was still a lack of expertise to.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  41. Requirement of specialized skills can discourage some potential users.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  42. Stakeholder involvement.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  43. Question: How can the expectations of all parties involved in the process being managed?‏‎ (1 link)
  44. From a management perspective, to avoid the complication of testing something new, the models used.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  45. Web-HIPRE was used for the AHP. Since then‏‎ (1 link)
  46. HPS 2.5‏‎ (1 link)
  47. Finland-Strategic planning at the national forest administration.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  48. UNISOMA‏‎ (1 link)
  49. Projection of stand development increases knowledge base.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  50. WISDOM‏‎ (1 link)

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

Retrieved from "http://fp0804.emu.ee/wiki/index.php/Special:WantedPages"