Need of flexibilization of analytical tools - no overdesigned tool that provides too much features for the use
From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
Revision as of 20:09, 5 May 2013 by SeanGordon (Talk | contribs)
Lesson
ID | |
---|---|
Has statement | Need flexible analytical tools - no "overdesigned" tool that provides too much features for the use |
Has evidence | |
Has consequences | |
Has recommendation for action | |
Has domain | Application of the DSS, Models and methods, System requirement and design |
Has DSS development stage | |
Has decision stage | |
Has temporal scale | Long term (strategic) |
Has spatial context | Spatial with neighbourhood interrelations |
Has spatial scale | Regional/national level |
Has objectives dimension | Multiple objectives |
Has goods and services dimension | Market services, Non-market services |
Has decision making dimension | More than one decision maker/stakeholder |
Has country | Germany |
Has reference | |
Has related DSS | PYL |
Has related case | Germany-Using GISCAME to test alternative land-use scenarios under climate change in the Upper Elbe Valley |
Has related lesson | |
Has other relevant information | |
Has working group theme | Dss development process, Models & techniques |
Has DSS development | |
Has decision support techniques | |
Has knowledge management processes | |
Has support for social participation | |
Has actor perspective | Developer/Architect |
Has researcher role | |
Has user role | |
Has developer role |