Difference between revisions of "2011-06 Thessaloniki Case Study Notes by WG"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Purposes: | Purposes: | ||
| − | Lessons learned ! | + | * Lessons learned ! |
| − | Concrete impacts of DSS in SFM | + | * Concrete impacts of DSS in SFM |
| − | Role of architecture and development process | + | * Role of architecture and development process |
| − | Why DSS are not used ... ? | + | * Why DSS are not used ... ? |
The set of case studies should cover ... | The set of case studies should cover ... | ||
| − | most important planning problem types (based on the number of countries mentioning them ?) | + | * most important planning problem types (based on the number of countries mentioning them ?) |
| − | most (all) regions covered by COST FORSYS (group of countries) | + | * most (all) regions covered by COST FORSYS (group of countries) |
| − | different types of architectures and development methodologies | + | * different types of architectures and development methodologies |
| − | issues like interoperability, GUI (user friendliness) | + | * issues like interoperability, GUI (user friendliness) |
| − | successful and unsuccessful DSSs (what is successful ?) | + | * successful and unsuccessful DSSs (what is successful ?) |
most of the temporal and spatial scales | most of the temporal and spatial scales | ||
Revision as of 13:02, 7 June 2011
WGI
Purposes:
- Lessons learned !
- Concrete impacts of DSS in SFM
- Role of architecture and development process
- Why DSS are not used ... ?
The set of case studies should cover ...
- most important planning problem types (based on the number of countries mentioning them ?)
- most (all) regions covered by COST FORSYS (group of countries)
- different types of architectures and development methodologies
- issues like interoperability, GUI (user friendliness)
- successful and unsuccessful DSSs (what is successful ?)
most of the temporal and spatial scales
Single case study selection criteria: - Described in the WIKI (gold flag), presented in the country report - Possibility to come in contact with developers, researchers and users?
Selection of the case studies – what kinds of case studies ? how many ? Main problem types assessment 3 case studies Context, tradition, institutional setup (why DSS used, why not) 2
WG3
Criteria - Problem types should cover different countries in a wider geographical context (Non Cost countries, Cost Countries,…) - Screening of DSS is not enough – analyze certain hypothesis - What are the similarities/differences in the context of the applicationss (Who? How?)
Topics - Comparing DSS for Fire management - Comparing DSS for adapting forest management under CC - Comparing DSS for utilization of forest resources for energy use - Comparing DSS for Sustainable Forest Management
Other issues - Comparing DSS in most often described problem types (reduce dimensions) - Comparing the development processes for DSS (regional, forest, stand – strategic, tactical, operational) - Comparing the process of the DSS application from KM perspective (how the tools Expert Systems, Knowledge Mapping, Web Portal are used and benchmark with others)
