Difference between revisions of "Actor Network Theory provides a suitable lens for exploring both technical and human aspects of DSS institutionalization in the forestry domain"

From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: require(): Unable to allocate memory for pool. in /data/home/fp0804/www/wiki/includes/AutoLoader.php on line 1191
(Forsys_add_wg_subthemes.py)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Lesson
 
{{Lesson
−
|ID=5
 
 
|Has statement=Actor Network Theory provides a suitable lens for exploring both technical and human aspects of DSS institutionalization in the forestry domain
 
|Has statement=Actor Network Theory provides a suitable lens for exploring both technical and human aspects of DSS institutionalization in the forestry domain
 +
|Has evidence=Based on the account that we have developed, we are now able to explain how DSS are institutionalized in the forestry domain and why things have happened.
 +
|Has consequences=Other existing approaches do not look behind the actors and why they do the things they do, contrary to Actor Network Theory they do not "trace" and thus they miss important connections.
 +
|Has recommendation for action=Consider both human and technology actors at the same level and follow their associations. Describe traces left by group formation.
 +
|Has domain=Ongoing development
 
|Has temporal scale=Long term (strategic)
 
|Has temporal scale=Long term (strategic)
 
|Has spatial context=Spatial with neighbourhood interrelations
 
|Has spatial context=Spatial with neighbourhood interrelations
Line 9: Line 12:
 
|Has decision making dimension=More than one decision maker/stakeholder
 
|Has decision making dimension=More than one decision maker/stakeholder
 
|Has country=Germany
 
|Has country=Germany
−
|Has related DSS=PYL
 
−
|Has related case=Germany-Actor Network Theory to Understand Collaborative Decision Support Systems Development in Forest Management Practice
 
−
|Has working group theme=Dss development process, Models & techniques
 
−
|Has DSS development=Stakeholder involvement.Description of DSS development
 
−
|Has decision support techniques=Stakeholder involvement.Decision support techniques
 
−
|Has knowledge management processes=Stakeholder involvement.Knowledge management process
 
−
|Has support for social participation=Stakeholder involvement.Support of social participation
 
−
|Has evidence=Based on the account that we have developed, we are now able to explain how DSS are institutionalized in the forestry domain and why things have happened.
 
−
|Has consequences=Other existing approaches do not look behind the actors and why they do the things they do, contrary to Actor Network Theory they do not "trace" and thus they miss important connections.
 
−
|Has recommendation for action=Consider both human and technology actors at the same level and follow their associations. Describe traces left by group formation.
 
−
|Has domain=
 
 
|Has reference=See case
 
|Has reference=See case
 +
|Has related case=Germany-Actor Network Theory to Understand Collaborative Decision Support Systems Development in Forest Management Practice
 
|Has related lesson=Using Actor Network Theory in the design stage can help in understanding the dynamism of the network
 
|Has related lesson=Using Actor Network Theory in the design stage can help in understanding the dynamism of the network
 
|Has other relevant information=See case
 
|Has other relevant information=See case
 
|Has actor perspective=Developer/Architect, Researcher
 
|Has actor perspective=Developer/Architect, Researcher
−
|Has DSS development stage=Update
 
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 07:52, 9 September 2013

Lesson

ID
Has statement Actor Network Theory provides a suitable lens for exploring both technical and human aspects of DSS institutionalization in the forestry domain
Has evidence Based on the account that we have developed, we are now able to explain how DSS are institutionalized in the forestry domain and why things have happened.
Has consequences Other existing approaches do not look behind the actors and why they do the things they do, contrary to Actor Network Theory they do not "trace" and thus they miss important connections.
Has recommendation for action Consider both human and technology actors at the same level and follow their associations. Describe traces left by group formation.
Has domain Ongoing development
Has DSS development stage
Has decision stage
Has temporal scale Long term (strategic)
Has spatial context Spatial with neighbourhood interrelations
Has spatial scale Forest level, Regional/national level
Has objectives dimension Multiple objectives
Has goods and services dimension Market services, Non-market services
Has decision making dimension More than one decision maker/stakeholder
Has country Germany
Has reference See case
Has related DSS
Has related case Germany-Actor Network Theory to Understand Collaborative Decision Support Systems Development in Forest Management Practice
Has related lesson Using Actor Network Theory in the design stage can help in understanding the dynamism of the network
Has other relevant information See case
Has working group theme
Has DSS development
Has decision support techniques
Has knowledge management processes
Has support for social participation
Has actor perspective Developer/Architect, Researcher
Has researcher role
Has user role
Has developer role
Retrieved from "http://fp0804.emu.ee/wiki/index.php?title=Actor_Network_Theory_provides_a_suitable_lens_for_exploring_both_technical_and_human_aspects_of_DSS_institutionalization_in_the_forestry_domain&oldid=10519"