Difference between revisions of "Natural Resources Planning in Metsähallitus"
From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
(Created page with '== Natural Resources Planning in Metsähallitus ==') |
(→Natural Resources Planning in Metsähallitus) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Natural Resources Planning in Metsähallitus == | == Natural Resources Planning in Metsähallitus == | ||
| + | |||
| + | == General case description == | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Cases of participatory planning in forestry]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Brief overview === | ||
| + | Briefly define purpose & objectives of the case introduced | ||
| + | |||
| + | * what was the problem | ||
| + | * what was the end product | ||
| + | * what was the planning area | ||
| + | * what was the planning organization | ||
| + | * who was the decision maker | ||
| + | * what were the aims of the project | ||
| + | * what were the aims of the participation process in the project (for example, conflict resolution, increasing acceptance of decisions) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Help documents]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | __TOC__ | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Organization == | ||
| + | * Who started the process? | ||
| + | * What influence did the participation have in the decision process? (for instance compared to Arnstein levels of participation) | ||
| + | * How is the participation process organized? | ||
| + | * What was the time frame for participation? | ||
| + | * What was the time frame related to the project time frame? | ||
| + | * What was the budget of project/participation (for example in money, workdays etc.)? | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Problem structuring === | ||
| + | * How was the problem defined? | ||
| + | * Who defined the problem? Was participation used in problem definition phase? | ||
| + | * What tools or methods were used in problem structuring, if any? | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Intelligence == | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Stakeholders === | ||
| + | * who were the stakeholders? | ||
| + | * how were they selected? | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Objectives === | ||
| + | * what were the criteria? | ||
| + | * how were they selected? | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Preferences === | ||
| + | * how were the preferences of the decision makers and stakeholders elicited? | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Information === | ||
| + | * what information was collected? | ||
| + | * what tools were used for data collection? | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Design == | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Alternatives === | ||
| + | * What kind of alternatives were considered? | ||
| + | * How were they defined? | ||
| + | * Who defined them? | ||
| + | * What tools and methods (if any) were used to define them? | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Choice == | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Usage of DSS === | ||
| + | * What kind of DSS was used (if any)? | ||
| + | * How was the DSS used in the process? | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Usage of models, methods and tools === | ||
| + | * What kind of decision support tools (models, methods) were used, if any? | ||
| + | * How were the decision support tools used? (for instance, through internet, with the help of a facilitator, with hands-on experiments) | ||
| + | * Was the use of decision support tools interactive? | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Monitoring == | ||
| + | * Was the success of the project monitored? | ||
| + | * How was the success of the project monitored? (both process and product) | ||
| + | * Who monitored the success? | ||
| + | * Were the decisions/plans implemented? | ||
| + | * Was the implementation monitored? | ||
| + | * Were the goals set for participation achieved? | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==References== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Pykäläinen, J., Kangas, J. and Loikkanen, T. 1999. Interactive decision analysis in participatory strategic forest planning: Experiences from State owned boreal forests. Journal of Forest Economics 5: 341-364. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===Cited references=== | ||
| + | <references/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===External resources=== | ||
Revision as of 17:55, 26 November 2009
Natural Resources Planning in Metsähallitus
General case description
Brief overview
Briefly define purpose & objectives of the case introduced
- what was the problem
- what was the end product
- what was the planning area
- what was the planning organization
- who was the decision maker
- what were the aims of the project
- what were the aims of the participation process in the project (for example, conflict resolution, increasing acceptance of decisions)
Contents
Organization
- Who started the process?
- What influence did the participation have in the decision process? (for instance compared to Arnstein levels of participation)
- How is the participation process organized?
- What was the time frame for participation?
- What was the time frame related to the project time frame?
- What was the budget of project/participation (for example in money, workdays etc.)?
Problem structuring
- How was the problem defined?
- Who defined the problem? Was participation used in problem definition phase?
- What tools or methods were used in problem structuring, if any?
Intelligence
Stakeholders
- who were the stakeholders?
- how were they selected?
Objectives
- what were the criteria?
- how were they selected?
Preferences
- how were the preferences of the decision makers and stakeholders elicited?
Information
- what information was collected?
- what tools were used for data collection?
Design
Alternatives
- What kind of alternatives were considered?
- How were they defined?
- Who defined them?
- What tools and methods (if any) were used to define them?
Choice
Usage of DSS
- What kind of DSS was used (if any)?
- How was the DSS used in the process?
Usage of models, methods and tools
- What kind of decision support tools (models, methods) were used, if any?
- How were the decision support tools used? (for instance, through internet, with the help of a facilitator, with hands-on experiments)
- Was the use of decision support tools interactive?
Monitoring
- Was the success of the project monitored?
- How was the success of the project monitored? (both process and product)
- Who monitored the success?
- Were the decisions/plans implemented?
- Was the implementation monitored?
- Were the goals set for participation achieved?
References
Pykäläinen, J., Kangas, J. and Loikkanen, T. 1999. Interactive decision analysis in participatory strategic forest planning: Experiences from State owned boreal forests. Journal of Forest Economics 5: 341-364.
Cited references
