Difference between revisions of "Regular ongoing engagement helped maintain interest of users"
From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) (Created page with "xxx") |
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) (Seans automated transfer) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | {{Lesson | |
+ | |Has statement=Regular ongoing engagement with via “Users group” helped maintain interest of users and contributing scientists. | ||
+ | |Has evidence=to be completed | ||
+ | |Has consequences=to be completed | ||
+ | |Has recommendation for action=Via Users Group and communities, specialized social networks ecc... | ||
+ | |Has domain=Dissemination, Knowledge management, Stakeholder involvement in the development and use of DSS | ||
+ | |Has temporal scale=Long term (strategic) | ||
+ | |Has spatial context=Non spatial | ||
+ | |Has spatial scale=Stand level | ||
+ | |Has objectives dimension=Single objective | ||
+ | |Has goods and services dimension=Market wood products | ||
+ | |Has decision making dimension=Single decision maker | ||
+ | |Has other relevant information=The KM phase pertains mainly to knowledge transfer and sharing | ||
+ | |Has related DSS=STANDPACK | ||
+ | |Has country=New Zealand | ||
+ | |Has related case=New Zealand-Modular Forest Management DSS in NZ | ||
+ | |Has actor perspective=Researcher, User | ||
+ | |Has working group theme=Knowledge management | ||
+ | |Has DSS development=Regular ongoing engagement helped maintain interest of users.Description of DSS development | ||
+ | |Has decision support techniques=Regular ongoing engagement helped maintain interest of users.Decision support techniques | ||
+ | |Has knowledge management processes=Regular ongoing engagement helped maintain interest of users.Knowledge management process | ||
+ | |Has support for social participation=Regular ongoing engagement helped maintain interest of users.Support of social participation | ||
+ | |Has developer role= | ||
+ | }} |
Revision as of 20:30, 2 May 2013
Lesson
ID | |
---|---|
Has statement | Regular ongoing engagement with via “Users group” helped maintain interest of users and contributing scientists. |
Has evidence | to be completed |
Has consequences | to be completed |
Has recommendation for action | Via Users Group and communities, specialized social networks ecc... |
Has domain | Dissemination, Knowledge management, Stakeholder involvement in the development and use of DSS |
Has DSS development stage | |
Has decision stage | |
Has temporal scale | Long term (strategic) |
Has spatial context | Non spatial |
Has spatial scale | Stand level |
Has objectives dimension | Single objective |
Has goods and services dimension | Market wood products |
Has decision making dimension | Single decision maker |
Has country | New Zealand |
Has reference | |
Has related DSS | STANDPACK |
Has related case | New Zealand-Modular Forest Management DSS in NZ |
Has related lesson | |
Has other relevant information | The KM phase pertains mainly to knowledge transfer and sharing |
Has working group theme | Knowledge management |
Has DSS development | Regular ongoing engagement helped maintain interest of users.Description of DSS development |
Has decision support techniques | Regular ongoing engagement helped maintain interest of users.Decision support techniques |
Has knowledge management processes | Regular ongoing engagement helped maintain interest of users.Knowledge management process |
Has support for social participation | Regular ongoing engagement helped maintain interest of users.Support of social participation |
Has actor perspective | Researcher, User |
Has researcher role | |
Has user role | |
Has developer role |