Wanted pages

From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
Jump to: navigation, search

Showing below up to 100 results starting with #101.

View (previous 100 | next 100) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

  1. Bottom up approach in designing software architecture and features (OOP)‏‎ (2 links)
  2. RODAL-ARBOREX‏‎ (2 links)
  3. PractiSFM multi-resource inventory and decision support for private forest owners‏‎ (2 links)
  4. Wolschart‏‎ (2 links)
  5. Forester GIS‏‎ (2 links)
  6. Coming soon...‏‎ (2 links)
  7. Heureka.Knowledge management process‏‎ (2 links)
  8. Enterprise Architecture‏‎ (2 links)
  9. ProgettoBosco a data-driven DSS for forest planning: an application in Abruzzo Region‏‎ (2 links)
  10. Mushrooms‏‎ (2 links)
  11. BoLa a specific sDSS to support land use planning in Flanders‏‎ (2 links)
  12. GIS and ME‏‎ (2 links)
  13. SADfLOR v pp 1.0‏‎ (2 links)
  14. ---‏‎ (2 links)
  15. Gaya - SGIS‏‎ (2 links)
  16. PrOFA‏‎ (2 links)
  17. ZEUS‏‎ (2 links)
  18. 1) user requirements analysis following Delphi approach‏‎ (2 links)
  19. Developing a collaborative management plan for the NIFP in Vale do Sousa‏‎ (2 links)
  20. To be filled‏‎ (2 links)
  21. Sustainable Management of Mediterranean Forest: Valencian Community Case‏‎ (2 links)
  22. 2) CA‏‎ (2 links)
  23. Developing a management plan for the CHAMUSCA county‏‎ (2 links)
  24. Tobe filled‏‎ (2 links)
  25. FIS‏‎ (2 links)
  26. Tactical/operational forest planning in a Portuguese integrated Pulp and Paper Company‏‎ (2 links)
  27. GIS‏‎ (2 links)
  28. 3) version control and buck tracking system‏‎ (2 links)
  29. SCRUM/Agile‏‎ (2 links)
  30. Institute of Silviculture‏‎ (2 links)
  31. ETCAP‏‎ (2 links)
  32. 4) iterative development since 2007 with permanent testing and user feed-back‏‎ (2 links)
  33. User training individual to provide optimal mix of Apps‏‎ (2 links)
  34. DSS Template‏‎ (2 links)
  35. TAKARNET‏‎ (2 links)
  36. A comprehensive system for forest management planning in Trentino Province‏‎ (2 links)
  37. 5) Used for regional planning‏‎ (2 links)
  38. USDA Forest Service‏‎ (2 links)
  39. Integrating wood quality considerations in landscape-level forest planning‏‎ (2 links)
  40. Example DSS/SHRIMP‏‎ (2 links)
  41. JOVOKEP‏‎ (2 links)
  42. 6) Version management and feed-back collection handled by the software enterprise PiSolution GmbH‏‎ (2 links)
  43. Allocation of slope protection measures‏‎ (2 links)
  44. Template:Transclude‏‎ (2 links)
  45. US Department of Agriculture - Forest Service‏‎ (2 links)
  46. 7) now adaptation for land use planning in Western Africa‏‎ (2 links)
  47. HedeDanmark‏‎ (2 links)
  48. Need of flexibilization of analytical tools - no overdesigned tool that provides too much features for the use.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  49. The scope of the modeling project can change significantly during the project.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  50. Providing procedures and structure for data flow from selection of field sample, performing field.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  51. Afonso IV of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  52. Adapting the software to make it possible to easily include also the output of other mechanistic.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  53. United States-Boise-Payette-Sawtooth National Forest Plan.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  54. Pedro V of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  55. The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  56. Metsähallitus‏‎ (1 link)
  57. Italy-ProgettoBosco a data-driven DSS for forest planning: an application in Abruzzo Region.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  58. Spatial variation between regions led to the development of different regional models, which led to.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  59. Research institution‏‎ (1 link)
  60. Type:Record‏‎ (1 link)
  61. O+BN‏‎ (1 link)
  62. Cases‏‎ (1 link)
  63. Italy-A comprehensive system for forest management planning in Trentino Province.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  64. Growth and Yield models are a key component of forest DSS.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  65. Portugal-Developing a management plan for the CHAMUSCA county.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  66. University College Dublin‏‎ (1 link)
  67. Etc) may decrease the number of comparisons‏‎ (1 link)
  68. Fast‏‎ (1 link)
  69. It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  70. Decision criteria beyond the state of the ecosystem (for example, social values fire risk, economic.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  71. Need of a moderator function.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  72. Dss development process, Participation, Knowledge management‏‎ (1 link)
  73. Getting joint funding from both the forest and environmental sectors can be a successfull for.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  74. University of Copenhagen‏‎ (1 link)
  75. Enlarge the decision space by generating a large set of potential management alternatives.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  76. A financial analysis is an important component in the discussion about the preferences of different.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  77. Enabling the analyses of several ecosystem services (timber and non-timber resources) in one and the.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  78. A a test lesson.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  79. Henry of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  80. T4.Software identification‏‎ (1 link)
  81. Ongoing development‏‎ (1 link)
  82. Alternative silvicultural prescriptions can be computed or an already existing scenario modified. Thereby the user is supported by the scenario manager. For a given scenario‏‎ (1 link)
  83. Pareto Frontier Techniques are useful for multi-criteria forest management planning.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  84. Modular approach helpful in assisting industry uptake.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  85. SIPAFIT sub-systems have been useful in training activities, and can be very useful to explain and.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  86. Template:DSS description, Support of knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  87. Tosia‏‎ (1 link)
  88. ForestGales.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  89. Metodology and results are transparent and easy-to-share to non-expert stakeholders.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  90. Voronov 2010‏‎ (1 link)
  91. United States-The restoration strategy of the dry and mesic landscape in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  92. The choice to develop the system in an Excel environment was based on the status of computer.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  93. Property:Additional information‏‎ (1 link)
  94. Question: Is it important to define the responsibilities and ownership for the DSS development process?‏‎ (1 link)
  95. Using Actor Network Theory in the design stage can help in understanding the dynamism of the network.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  96. A more informative output should be generated with clear graphs and maps indicating long-term.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  97. Visualization of the preliminary actor network made the people explicity include the DSS in a planning process.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  98. Property:Has working group theme:Knowledge management‏‎ (1 link)
  99. Template:STSM Opportunity‏‎ (1 link)
  100. Need for new models for the later use of a tool.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)

View (previous 100 | next 100) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

Retrieved from "http://fp0804.emu.ee/wiki/index.php/Special:WantedPages"