Wanted pages

From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
Jump to: navigation, search

Showing below up to 250 results starting with #251.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

  1. Herbicide advisor‏‎ (1 link)
  2. Question: Is it important to facilitate a process for the problem definition before starting design and programming?‏‎ (1 link)
  3. At the Department of Forest and Soil Sciences‏‎ (1 link)
  4. Property:Has working group theme:Models & techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  5. Visualization of the preliminary actor network made the people explicity include the DSS in a planning process.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  6. A financial analysis is an important component in the discussion about the preferences of different.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  7. Getting joint funding from both the forest and environmental sectors can be a successfull for.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  8. Recreation‏‎ (1 link)
  9. Enlarge the decision space by generating a large set of potential management alternatives.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  10. T4.Support of Knowledge Management‏‎ (1 link)
  11. Enabling the analyses of several ecosystem services (timber and non-timber resources) in one and the.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  12. Intensity (amount of timber) and temporal progression (period) of a silvicultural treatment.‏‎ (1 link)
  13. House of Aviz‏‎ (1 link)
  14. Modular approach helpful in assisting industry uptake.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  15. CRA-MPF - Trento - Italy‏‎ (1 link)
  16. Pareto Frontier Techniques are useful for multi-criteria forest management planning.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  17. SIPAFIT sub-systems have been useful in training activities, and can be very useful to explain and.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  18. Template:DSS description, Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  19. FEIDESSYS‏‎ (1 link)
  20. Metodology and results are transparent and easy-to-share to non-expert stakeholders.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  21. Operational aspects of the system should be enhanced.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  22. Involving local stakeholders in ranking the functions allowed to show them tangibly how their‏‎ (1 link)
  23. United States-The restoration strategy of the dry and mesic landscape in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  24. Students studying forest management planning procedures and processes were very useful ‘guinea pigs’.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  25. A more informative output should be generated with clear graphs and maps indicating long-term.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  26. It is necessary to know which data will be use as variables in the models before designing the DSS.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  27. United States-The forest plan revision process in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  28. Austria-Improving forestry extension services for small-scale private landowners.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  29. Need for new models for the later use of a tool.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  30. PractiSFM.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  31. Use of the DSS has been considered successful by the participating organizations, even though it has.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  32. The DSS gave the forest manager the opportunity to experiment how their emphasis towards certain.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  33. Stakeholder involvement in DSS design.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  34. Belgium-BoLa a specific sDSS to support land use planning in Flanders.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  35. Http://www.skogforsk.se/‏‎ (1 link)
  36. The ProgettoBosco working methodology, based on cooperation, successive approximations and.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  37. EIR‏‎ (1 link)
  38. Joseph I of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  39. D.t2‏‎ (1 link)
  40. The fact that ProgettoBosco is conceived according to the criteria and indicators of sustainable.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  41. Portugal-Pulpwood Supply Chain Planning in a Portuguese integrated Pulp and Paper Company.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  42. Portugal-Integrating an ecosystem model into SADfLOR Decision Support platform for optimal forest management planning under changing climate in boreal conditions..Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  43. LandSim‏‎ (1 link)
  44. Spain-Sustainable Management of Mediterranean Forest: Valencian Community Case.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  45. DSS allowed to explain better some technical concepts to non-professional stakeholders.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  46. Group participation with knowledgeable people is a good way to ensure that the decision hierarchy is.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  47. Germany-Actor Network Theory to Understand Collaborative Decision Support Systems Development in Forest Management Practice.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  48. Case Handbook‏‎ (1 link)
  49. No full DSS was used‏‎ (1 link)
  50. Decision criteria beyond the state of the ecosystem (for example, social values fire risk, economic.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  51. Models & techniques, Knowledge management‏‎ (1 link)
  52. Finland-Strategic planning at the national forest administration.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  53. It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  54. The scope of the modeling project can change significantly during the project.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  55. Brazil: Short rotation eucalyptus pulp wood plantations.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  56. Need of flexibilization of analytical tools - no overdesigned tool that provides too much features for the use.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  57. The kinds of DSS traditionally used to calculate timber harvest levels are now being used to model.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  58. The DSS models built must match the knowledge of the local forest managers, so the ability for local.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  59. PoodyBlep‏‎ (1 link)
  60. Afonso VI of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  61. The user has to be aware of the possibly large impact that the chosen land indicators and threshold.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  62. United States-Boise-Payette-Sawtooth National Forest Plan.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  63. Peter II of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  64. Spatial variation between regions led to the development of different regional models, which led to.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  65. The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  66. RoNET-KNA‏‎ (1 link)
  67. CommonGIS‏‎ (1 link)
  68. Comunità Montana Cadore Longaronese Zoldo‏‎ (1 link)
  69. The development of large and enduring systems requires a long term approach.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  70. Portugal-Developing a management plan for the CHAMUSCA county.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  71. Italy A comprehensive system for the forest management planning in Trentino Province‏‎ (1 link)
  72. Belgium-Participative modelling of long-term wood production in the forest complex ‘Bosland’.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  73. Growth and Yield models are a key component of forest DSS.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  74. Portugal-Developing a collaborative management plan for the NIFP in Vale do Sousa.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  75. François de Coligny‏‎ (1 link)
  76. ForEco‏‎ (1 link)
  77. Question: Is it important to organize an efficient communication and coordination among the team members?‏‎ (1 link)
  78. Department of Forest and Soil Sciences‏‎ (1 link)
  79. Property:Has working group theme:Participation‏‎ (1 link)
  80. Visualization of the preliminary actor network made the people explicity include the DSS in a planning process.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  81. Model building was rapid, it was assembling the data that took by far the most time.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  82. Getting joint funding from both the forest and environmental sectors can be a successfull for.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  83. Landscape value‏‎ (1 link)
  84. Enlarge the decision space by generating a large set of potential management alternatives.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  85. T4.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  86. Enabling the analyses of several ecosystem services (timber and non-timber resources) in one and the.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  87. Machinery costs) as well as current wood-selling prices can be modified. The user defines the type (areal or spatially selective)‏‎ (1 link)
  88. House of Braganza‏‎ (1 link)
  89. Modular approach helpful in assisting industry uptake.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  90. Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura - unità di Ricerca per il Monitoraggio e la Pianificazione Forestale‏‎ (1 link)
  91. WWG Manager‏‎ (1 link)
  92. Pareto Frontier Techniques are useful for multi-criteria forest management planning.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  93. As the core of forest DSS are models describing the development of trees and stands (growth and.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  94. WFCM-DSS‏‎ (1 link)
  95. Template:DSS description, System design and development‏‎ (1 link)
  96. HEUDESSYS‏‎ (1 link)
  97. Metodology and results are transparent and easy-to-share to non-expert stakeholders.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  98. Operational aspects of the system should be enhanced.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  99. United States-The restoration strategy of the dry and mesic landscape in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  100. Students studying forest management planning procedures and processes were very useful ‘guinea pigs’.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  101. A more informative output should be generated with clear graphs and maps indicating long-term.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  102. Università della Tuscia - Italy‏‎ (1 link)
  103. United States-The forest plan revision process in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  104. Forestry extension services‏‎ (1 link)
  105. Need for new models for the later use of a tool.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  106. PractiSFM.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  107. Use of the DSS has been considered successful by the participating organizations, even though it has.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  108. The DSS gave the forest manager the opportunity to experiment how their emphasis towards certain.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  109. Stakeholder involvement in DSS design.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  110. Belgium-BoLa a specific sDSS to support land use planning in Flanders.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  111. SkogForsk‏‎ (1 link)
  112. The ProgettoBosco working methodology, based on cooperation, successive approximations and.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  113. EELIS‏‎ (1 link)
  114. List of Portuguese monarchs‏‎ (1 link)
  115. Km.t‏‎ (1 link)
  116. The fact that ProgettoBosco is conceived according to the criteria and indicators of sustainable.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  117. DSS for brown bear management‏‎ (1 link)
  118. Heureka RegWise‏‎ (1 link)
  119. Portugal-Integrating an ecosystem model into SADfLOR Decision Support platform for optimal forest management planning under changing climate in boreal conditions..Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  120. Any‏‎ (1 link)
  121. Spain-Sustainable Management of Mediterranean Forest: Valencian Community Case.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  122. DSS allowed to explain better some technical concepts to non-professional stakeholders.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  123. Group participation with knowledgeable people is a good way to ensure that the decision hierarchy is.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  124. Landwirtschaft‏‎ (1 link)
  125. Forest planning problem type Handbook‏‎ (1 link)
  126. Using AHP in combination with other methods (regression‏‎ (1 link)
  127. Decision criteria beyond the state of the ecosystem (for example, social values fire risk, economic.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  128. Participation, Knowledge management‏‎ (1 link)
  129. Finland-Strategic planning at the national forest administration.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  130. Projection of stand development increases knowledge base.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  131. Norwegian University of Life Sciences (UMB)‏‎ (1 link)
  132. Brazil: Short rotation eucalyptus pulp wood plantations.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  133. Stakeholder involvement.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  134. Need of flexibilization of analytical tools - no overdesigned tool that provides too much features for the use.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  135. The kinds of DSS traditionally used to calculate timber harvest levels are now being used to model.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  136. The DSS models built must match the knowledge of the local forest managers, so the ability for local.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  137. Austral‏‎ (1 link)
  138. Afonso V of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  139. The user has to be aware of the possibly large impact that the chosen land indicators and threshold.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  140. Lack of proper documentation and support services (manual, website, etc) can severely limit the.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  141. MEPAR‏‎ (1 link)
  142. Peter I of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  143. Spatial variation between regions led to the development of different regional models, which led to.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  144. The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  145. Wise Forms‏‎ (1 link)
  146. Template:DSS description, Concrete application‏‎ (1 link)
  147. Italy-Assessing forest functions at stand scale in a sub-regional forest plan in the Dolomites.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  148. The development of large and enduring systems requires a long term approach.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  149. Cowberry‏‎ (1 link)
  150. Belgium-Participative modelling of long-term wood production in the forest complex ‘Bosland’.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  151. Requirement of specialized skills can discourage some potential users.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  152. Portugal-Developing a collaborative management plan for the NIFP in Vale do Sousa.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  153. Samuel Dufour‏‎ (1 link)
  154. Question: Is it relevant to consider an adequate programming environment and programming tools for the implementation?‏‎ (1 link)
  155. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna‏‎ (1 link)
  156. An optimisation module comparing alternative scenarios based on multi-criteria analysis should be.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  157. Deer‏‎ (1 link)
  158. Visualization of the preliminary actor network made the people explicity include the DSS in a planning process.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  159. Model building was rapid, it was assembling the data that took by far the most time.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  160. The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  161. Plenty‏‎ (1 link)
  162. DSS helped document and apply decision criteria consistently, and therefore produced a more.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  163. Embedding a DSS in a GIS software allows obtaining information at different spatial scales using the.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  164. System costs (personnel expenditure‏‎ (1 link)
  165. House of Braganza-Saxe-Coburg and Gotha‏‎ (1 link)
  166. SIGFOR.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  167. Supports Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDA by AHP and SMART)‏‎ (1 link)
  168. Pareto Frontier Techniques are useful for multi-criteria forest management planning.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  169. As the core of forest DSS are models describing the development of trees and stands (growth and.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  170. TUZTER‏‎ (1 link)
  171. Template:DSS description, Technological architecture, integration with other systems‏‎ (1 link)
  172. IFFIRES‏‎ (1 link)
  173. The design process was rather ad-hoc and sequential, as a result of step-wise funding becoming.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  174. Operational aspects of the system should be enhanced.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  175. United States-The restoration strategy of the dry and mesic landscape in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  176. Students studying forest management planning procedures and processes were very useful ‘guinea pigs’.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  177. A more informative output should be generated with clear graphs and maps indicating long-term.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  178. Università della Tuscia - Università del Molise‏‎ (1 link)
  179. United States-The forest plan revision process in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  180. Enlarged decision space.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  181. Need for new models for the later use of a tool.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  182. PractiSFM.Software‏‎ (1 link)
  183. The DSS usage enabled the planning team to measure the achievement of the restoration goals.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  184. Forest managers have to analyze how their forest management interventions effect the landscape.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  185. SIMPLOT‏‎ (1 link)
  186. New Zealand-Modular Forest Management DSS in NZ.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  187. Alterra‏‎ (1 link)
  188. The ProgettoBosco working methodology, based on cooperation, successive approximations and.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  189. Luís I of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  190. Sp.t‏‎ (1 link)
  191. The fact that ProgettoBosco is conceived according to the criteria and indicators of sustainable.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  192. EVH‏‎ (1 link)
  193. Spain-An agro-ecological Decision Support Systems for evaluting soil under scenarios of global change.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  194. End user engagement throughout the development and deployment cycle is very important.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  195. DSS for planning of forest operations technology‏‎ (1 link)
  196. Spain-Sustainable Management of Mediterranean Forest: Valencian Community Case.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  197. DSS allowed to explain better some technical concepts to non-professional stakeholders.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  198. Group participation with knowledgeable people is a good way to ensure that the decision hierarchy is.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  199. Ministerium für Umwelt‏‎ (1 link)
  200. Lesson Handbook‏‎ (1 link)
  201. Value functions‏‎ (1 link)
  202. Environmental basics and stakeholder opinion are applied.‏‎ (1 link)
  203. Data mining‏‎ (1 link)
  204. Finland-Strategic planning at the national forest administration.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  205. Projection of stand development increases knowledge base.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  206. UMB‏‎ (1 link)
  207. Brazil: Short rotation eucalyptus pulp wood plantations.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  208. Stakeholder involvement.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  209. Involvement‏‎ (1 link)
  210. The kinds of DSS traditionally used to calculate timber harvest levels are now being used to model.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  211. The DSS models built must match the knowledge of the local forest managers, so the ability for local.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  212. FMS 2.5‏‎ (1 link)
  213. António, Prior of Crato‏‎ (1 link)
  214. The user has to be aware of the possibly large impact that the chosen land indicators and threshold.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  215. Lack of proper documentation and support services (manual, website, etc) can severely limit the.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  216. Forest register‏‎ (1 link)
  217. Philip III of Spain‏‎ (1 link)
  218. Need of a moderator function.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  219. Decision process‏‎ (1 link)
  220. DSS for forest road network extension‏‎ (1 link)
  221. MultiCriteria Risk Analysis (MCRA)‏‎ (1 link)
  222. Template:DSS description, Data, data model and data management‏‎ (1 link)
  223. Italy-Assessing forest functions at stand scale in a sub-regional forest plan in the Dolomites.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  224. The development of large and enduring systems requires a long term approach.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  225. José Borges‏‎ (1 link)
  226. Belgium-Participative modelling of long-term wood production in the forest complex ‘Bosland’.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  227. Requirement of specialized skills can discourage some potential users.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  228. Portugal-Developing a collaborative management plan for the NIFP in Vale do Sousa.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  229. Question: How can stakeholders and users involvement in all phases of the DSS development project being facilitated?‏‎ (1 link)
  230. Pest control activity scheduling‏‎ (1 link)
  231. Question: Is it relevant to define a dissemination and commercialization strategy?‏‎ (1 link)
  232. Application of the DSS‏‎ (1 link)
  233. An optimisation module comparing alternative scenarios based on multi-criteria analysis should be.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  234. Deadwood‏‎ (1 link)
  235. The analysis of the actor network interactions allowed to identify the criticalities to be solved in order to develop the collaborative process.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  236. Model building was rapid, it was assembling the data that took by far the most time.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  237. The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  238. What-if‏‎ (1 link)
  239. VDDT-Path.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  240. DSS helped document and apply decision criteria consistently, and therefore produced a more.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  241. Embedding a DSS in a GIS software allows obtaining information at different spatial scales using the.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  242. SORSIM‏‎ (1 link)
  243. House of Burgundy‏‎ (1 link)
  244. The use of the DSS improved communication among the planning team by providing a framework of the.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  245. SIGFOR.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  246. Will be further developed include participatory planning‏‎ (1 link)
  247. Eurac research - Fabio Pastorella‏‎ (1 link)
  248. As the core of forest DSS are models describing the development of trees and stands (growth and.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  249. Template:DSS description, User interface and outputs‏‎ (1 link)
  250. Germany-Using GISCAME to test alternative land-use scenarios under climate change in the Upper Elbe Valley.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

Retrieved from "http://fp0804.emu.ee/wiki/index.php/Special:WantedPages"