Wanted pages

From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
Jump to: navigation, search

Showing below up to 500 results starting with #1.

View (previous 500 | next 500) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

  1. Type:String‏‎ (191 links)
  2. Type:Page‏‎ (49 links)
  3. Type:Number‏‎ (28 links)
  4. Type:Text‏‎ (24 links)
  5. Transfer‏‎ (22 links)
  6. None‏‎ (19 links)
  7. Non-computerized DSS‏‎ (16 links)
  8. Application‏‎ (15 links)
  9. Generation‏‎ (13 links)
  10. Interface‏‎ (12 links)
  11. Type:Boolean‏‎ (12 links)
  12. Capabilities‏‎ (11 links)
  13. Utilities‏‎ (10 links)
  14. Identification‏‎ (10 links)
  15. Problem specification‏‎ (10 links)
  16. Projmgt‏‎ (10 links)
  17. Basic structure‏‎ (10 links)
  18. Forest fire‏‎ (9 links)
  19. DSS‏‎ (9 links)
  20. Evaluation‏‎ (9 links)
  21. SILVANET‏‎ (8 links)
  22. Learning‏‎ (8 links)
  23. Woodstock + Stanley‏‎ (8 links)
  24. Students studying forest management planning procedures and processes were very useful ‘guinea pigs’‏‎ (7 links)
  25. Type:URL‏‎ (7 links)
  26. Habitat suitability‏‎ (7 links)
  27. Visualization of the preliminary actor network made the people explicity include the DSS in a planning process.‏‎ (7 links)
  28. Provide missing help/documentation service‏‎ (7 links)
  29. Resources‏‎ (6 links)
  30. Communication‏‎ (6 links)
  31. Documentation‏‎ (6 links)
  32. Carbon sequestration‏‎ (6 links)
  33. Using GISCAME to test alternative land-use scenarios under climate change in the Upper Elbe Valley‏‎ (6 links)
  34. Storage‏‎ (6 links)
  35. Fuzzy logic‏‎ (6 links)
  36. Type:Date‏‎ (6 links)
  37. Structure process‏‎ (6 links)
  38. Haloaclontologybundle‏‎ (6 links)
  39. Need of flexibilization of analytical tools - no "overdesigned" tool that provides too much features for the use‏‎ (6 links)
  40. Problem formulation‏‎ (6 links)
  41. To compare the current and the past quantitative/qualitative parameters of the forest, great effort‏‎ (5 links)
  42. Carbon and nitrogen flows‏‎ (5 links)
  43. Not prescriptive‏‎ (5 links)
  44. Input data‏‎ (5 links)
  45. Unnamed Knowledge based DSS‏‎ (5 links)
  46. Sensivity analysis‏‎ (5 links)
  47. Early involvement‏‎ (5 links)
  48. Electronic spreadsheets‏‎ (4 links)
  49. StandSIMOPT‏‎ (4 links)
  50. Pulpwood Supply Chain Planning in a Portuguese integrated Pulp and Paper Company‏‎ (4 links)
  51. STANDPACK‏‎ (4 links)
  52. VDDT‏‎ (4 links)
  53. Simosol‏‎ (4 links)
  54. Biodiversity‏‎ (4 links)
  55. Effects of data quality‏‎ (4 links)
  56. KU Leuven‏‎ (4 links)
  57. Conservation value‏‎ (4 links)
  58. Germany:Actor Network Theory to Understand Collaborative Decision Support Systems Development in Forest Management Practice‏‎ (4 links)
  59. Effects of models‏‎ (4 links)
  60. The restoration strategy of the dry and mesic landscape in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest‏‎ (4 links)
  61. Participative modelling of long-term wood production in the forest complex ‘Bosland’‏‎ (3 links)
  62. Instituto Superior de Agronomia‏‎ (3 links)
  63. Watershed Condition Assessment for the Northwest Forest Plan‏‎ (3 links)
  64. What-if analysis‏‎ (3 links)
  65. Assessing forest functions at stand scale in a sub-regional forest plan in the Dolomites‏‎ (3 links)
  66. AS‏‎ (3 links)
  67. Norwegian University of Life Sciences‏‎ (3 links)
  68. Boise-Payette-Sawtooth National Forest Plan‏‎ (3 links)
  69. Graphics‏‎ (3 links)
  70. Supporting a multi stakeholders decision process in a Portuguese National Forest‏‎ (3 links)
  71. Intelligent agent‏‎ (3 links)
  72. Universidade Técnica de Lisboa.‏‎ (3 links)
  73. Form:Case study‏‎ (3 links)
  74. SOSKLIMA‏‎ (3 links)
  75. DSS development‏‎ (3 links)
  76. SIMANFOR‏‎ (3 links)
  77. ‏‎ (3 links)
  78. Type:Email‏‎ (3 links)
  79. Improving forestry extension services for small-scale private landowners‏‎ (3 links)
  80. UML‏‎ (3 links)
  81. Institutionalization‏‎ (3 links)
  82. The development and introduction of versatile DSS in Sweden‏‎ (3 links)
  83. /sandbox‏‎ (3 links)
  84. A Decision Support System for eucalypt forest management under climate change scenarios‏‎ (3 links)
  85. Integrating an ecosystem model into SADfLOR Decision Support platform for optimal forest management planning under changing climate in boreal conditions.‏‎ (3 links)
  86. The forest plan revision process in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest‏‎ (3 links)
  87. /testcases‏‎ (3 links)
  88. SAPPI FMS‏‎ (3 links)
  89. Belgium-Participative modelling of long-term wood production in the forest complex Bosland‏‎ (3 links)
  90. The history of a successfull forest DSS in Sweden‏‎ (3 links)
  91. Template:Documentation/docname‏‎ (3 links)
  92. Actor Network Theory to Understand Collaborative Decision Support Systems Development in Forest Management Practice‏‎ (3 links)
  93. Syunev 2004‏‎ (3 links)
  94. Modular Forest Management DSS in NZ‏‎ (3 links)
  95. Centro de Estudos Florestais‏‎ (3 links)
  96. Template:Pp-meta‏‎ (3 links)
  97. An agro-ecological Decision Support Systems for evaluting soil under scenarios of global change‏‎ (3 links)
  98. System requirement and design‏‎ (2 links)
  99. GBNL‏‎ (2 links)
  100. Analysis of logging residues chain for a sustainable bioenergy production in Alta Val di Non‏‎ (2 links)
  101. Bottom up approach in designing software architecture and features (OOP)‏‎ (2 links)
  102. RODAL-ARBOREX‏‎ (2 links)
  103. PractiSFM multi-resource inventory and decision support for private forest owners‏‎ (2 links)
  104. Wolschart‏‎ (2 links)
  105. Forester GIS‏‎ (2 links)
  106. Coming soon...‏‎ (2 links)
  107. Heureka.Knowledge management process‏‎ (2 links)
  108. Enterprise Architecture‏‎ (2 links)
  109. ProgettoBosco a data-driven DSS for forest planning: an application in Abruzzo Region‏‎ (2 links)
  110. Mushrooms‏‎ (2 links)
  111. BoLa a specific sDSS to support land use planning in Flanders‏‎ (2 links)
  112. GIS and ME‏‎ (2 links)
  113. SADfLOR v pp 1.0‏‎ (2 links)
  114. ---‏‎ (2 links)
  115. Gaya - SGIS‏‎ (2 links)
  116. PrOFA‏‎ (2 links)
  117. ZEUS‏‎ (2 links)
  118. 1) user requirements analysis following Delphi approach‏‎ (2 links)
  119. Developing a collaborative management plan for the NIFP in Vale do Sousa‏‎ (2 links)
  120. To be filled‏‎ (2 links)
  121. Sustainable Management of Mediterranean Forest: Valencian Community Case‏‎ (2 links)
  122. 2) CA‏‎ (2 links)
  123. Developing a management plan for the CHAMUSCA county‏‎ (2 links)
  124. Tobe filled‏‎ (2 links)
  125. FIS‏‎ (2 links)
  126. Tactical/operational forest planning in a Portuguese integrated Pulp and Paper Company‏‎ (2 links)
  127. GIS‏‎ (2 links)
  128. 3) version control and buck tracking system‏‎ (2 links)
  129. SCRUM/Agile‏‎ (2 links)
  130. ETCAP‏‎ (2 links)
  131. Institute of Silviculture‏‎ (2 links)
  132. 4) iterative development since 2007 with permanent testing and user feed-back‏‎ (2 links)
  133. DSS Template‏‎ (2 links)
  134. User training individual to provide optimal mix of Apps‏‎ (2 links)
  135. TAKARNET‏‎ (2 links)
  136. A comprehensive system for forest management planning in Trentino Province‏‎ (2 links)
  137. 5) Used for regional planning‏‎ (2 links)
  138. Integrating wood quality considerations in landscape-level forest planning‏‎ (2 links)
  139. USDA Forest Service‏‎ (2 links)
  140. Example DSS/SHRIMP‏‎ (2 links)
  141. JOVOKEP‏‎ (2 links)
  142. 6) Version management and feed-back collection handled by the software enterprise PiSolution GmbH‏‎ (2 links)
  143. Allocation of slope protection measures‏‎ (2 links)
  144. US Department of Agriculture - Forest Service‏‎ (2 links)
  145. Template:Transclude‏‎ (2 links)
  146. 7) now adaptation for land use planning in Western Africa‏‎ (2 links)
  147. HedeDanmark‏‎ (2 links)
  148. Research institution‏‎ (1 link)
  149. The scope of the modeling project can change significantly during the project.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  150. Type:Record‏‎ (1 link)
  151. Italy-A comprehensive system for forest management planning in Trentino Province.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  152. Growth and Yield models are a key component of forest DSS.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  153. Adapting the software to make it possible to easily include also the output of other mechanistic.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  154. University College Dublin‏‎ (1 link)
  155. Etc) may decrease the number of comparisons‏‎ (1 link)
  156. Fast‏‎ (1 link)
  157. It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  158. Need of a moderator function.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  159. Spatial variation between regions led to the development of different regional models, which led to.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  160. O+BN‏‎ (1 link)
  161. Need of flexibilization of analytical tools - no overdesigned tool that provides too much features for the use.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  162. Cases‏‎ (1 link)
  163. Providing procedures and structure for data flow from selection of field sample, performing field.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  164. Portugal-Developing a management plan for the CHAMUSCA county.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  165. Afonso IV of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  166. United States-Boise-Payette-Sawtooth National Forest Plan.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  167. Pedro V of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  168. The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  169. Decision criteria beyond the state of the ecosystem (for example, social values fire risk, economic.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  170. Metsähallitus‏‎ (1 link)
  171. Italy-ProgettoBosco a data-driven DSS for forest planning: an application in Abruzzo Region.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  172. Dss development process, Participation, Knowledge management‏‎ (1 link)
  173. ForestGales.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  174. University of Copenhagen‏‎ (1 link)
  175. Metodology and results are transparent and easy-to-share to non-expert stakeholders.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  176. A financial analysis is an important component in the discussion about the preferences of different.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  177. United States-The restoration strategy of the dry and mesic landscape in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  178. A a test lesson.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  179. The choice to develop the system in an Excel environment was based on the status of computer.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  180. T4.Software identification‏‎ (1 link)
  181. Question: Is it important to define the responsibilities and ownership for the DSS development process?‏‎ (1 link)
  182. Alternative silvicultural prescriptions can be computed or an already existing scenario modified. Thereby the user is supported by the scenario manager. For a given scenario‏‎ (1 link)
  183. Using Actor Network Theory in the design stage can help in understanding the dynamism of the network.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  184. Modular approach helpful in assisting industry uptake.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  185. Tosia‏‎ (1 link)
  186. Visualization of the preliminary actor network made the people explicity include the DSS in a planning process.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  187. Getting joint funding from both the forest and environmental sectors can be a successfull for.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  188. Voronov 2010‏‎ (1 link)
  189. Enlarge the decision space by generating a large set of potential management alternatives.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  190. Enabling the analyses of several ecosystem services (timber and non-timber resources) in one and the.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  191. Property:Additional information‏‎ (1 link)
  192. Henry of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  193. Ongoing development‏‎ (1 link)
  194. A more informative output should be generated with clear graphs and maps indicating long-term.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  195. Pareto Frontier Techniques are useful for multi-criteria forest management planning.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  196. SIPAFIT sub-systems have been useful in training activities, and can be very useful to explain and.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  197. Property:Has working group theme:Knowledge management‏‎ (1 link)
  198. Template:DSS description, Support of knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  199. Need for new models for the later use of a tool.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  200. Form:Social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  201. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica y del Medio Natural‏‎ (1 link)
  202. Case Lessons involving software development on subform‏‎ (1 link)
  203. Use of the DSS has been considered successful by the participating organizations, even though it has.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  204. Germany-Actor Network Theory to Understand Collaborative Decision Support Systems Development in Forest Management Practice.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  205. Stakeholder involvement in DSS design.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  206. MatrixGen.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  207. Agricultural Research Council (CRA)‏‎ (1 link)
  208. MESTA.TATTI‏‎ (1 link)
  209. HSS‏‎ (1 link)
  210. Austria-Improving forestry extension services for small-scale private landowners.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  211. Analysis at the landscape level allowed the integration of concerns about multiple resources as well.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  212. Firecol‏‎ (1 link)
  213. Template:STSM Opportunity‏‎ (1 link)
  214. The DSS gave the forest manager the opportunity to experiment how their emphasis towards certain.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  215. ATestCase.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  216. Belgium-BoLa a specific sDSS to support land use planning in Flanders.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  217. The ProgettoBosco working methodology, based on cooperation, successive approximations and.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  218. Group participation with knowledgeable people is a good way to ensure that the decision hierarchy is.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  219. John V of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  220. Portugal-A Decision Support System for eucalypt forest management under climate change scenarios.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  221. It is necessary to know which data will be use as variables in the models before designing the DSS.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  222. Portugal-Pulpwood Supply Chain Planning in a Portuguese integrated Pulp and Paper Company.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  223. Portugal-Integrating an ecosystem model into SADfLOR Decision Support platform for optimal forest management planning under changing climate in boreal conditions..Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  224. ForMIS.Software‏‎ (1 link)
  225. The scope of the modeling project can change significantly during the project.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  226. Has related country study‏‎ (1 link)
  227. Belgium-Participative modelling of long-term wood production in the forest complex ‘Bosland’.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  228. Growth and Yield models are a key component of forest DSS.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  229. The kinds of DSS traditionally used to calculate timber harvest levels are now being used to model.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  230. Herbicide advisor‏‎ (1 link)
  231. In this paper‏‎ (1 link)
  232. The user has to be aware of the possibly large impact that the chosen land indicators and threshold.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  233. Fox‏‎ (1 link)
  234. Heureka PlanWise‏‎ (1 link)
  235. It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  236. Need of a moderator function.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  237. Spatial variation between regions led to the development of different regional models, which led to.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  238. Wildalpen/KATER II‏‎ (1 link)
  239. Need of flexibilization of analytical tools - no overdesigned tool that provides too much features for the use.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  240. Population dynamics‏‎ (1 link)
  241. KUBIK.Software‏‎ (1 link)
  242. Portugal-Developing a management plan for the CHAMUSCA county.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  243. Afonso I of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  244. United States-Boise-Payette-Sawtooth National Forest Plan.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  245. Portugal-Developing a collaborative management plan for the NIFP in Vale do Sousa.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  246. Peter III of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  247. The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  248. Decision criteria beyond the state of the ecosystem (for example, social values fire risk, economic.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  249. MAPSS.Software‏‎ (1 link)
  250. Italy-ProgettoBosco a data-driven DSS for forest planning: an application in Abruzzo Region.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  251. Models & techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  252. FEIDESSYS‏‎ (1 link)
  253. Metodology and results are transparent and easy-to-share to non-expert stakeholders.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  254. A financial analysis is an important component in the discussion about the preferences of different.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  255. United States-The restoration strategy of the dry and mesic landscape in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  256. Recreation‏‎ (1 link)
  257. Students studying forest management planning procedures and processes were very useful ‘guinea pigs’.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  258. T4.Support of Knowledge Management‏‎ (1 link)
  259. Question: Is it important to facilitate a process for the problem definition before starting design and programming?‏‎ (1 link)
  260. Intensity (amount of timber) and temporal progression (period) of a silvicultural treatment.‏‎ (1 link)
  261. At the Department of Forest and Soil Sciences‏‎ (1 link)
  262. Modular approach helpful in assisting industry uptake.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  263. Visualization of the preliminary actor network made the people explicity include the DSS in a planning process.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  264. Getting joint funding from both the forest and environmental sectors can be a successfull for.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  265. Enlarge the decision space by generating a large set of potential management alternatives.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  266. Enabling the analyses of several ecosystem services (timber and non-timber resources) in one and the.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  267. Operational aspects of the system should be enhanced.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  268. House of Aviz‏‎ (1 link)
  269. Involving local stakeholders in ranking the functions allowed to show them tangibly how their‏‎ (1 link)
  270. CRA-MPF - Trento - Italy‏‎ (1 link)
  271. A more informative output should be generated with clear graphs and maps indicating long-term.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  272. Pareto Frontier Techniques are useful for multi-criteria forest management planning.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  273. SIPAFIT sub-systems have been useful in training activities, and can be very useful to explain and.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  274. Property:Has working group theme:Models & techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  275. Template:DSS description, Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  276. Need for new models for the later use of a tool.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  277. Spain-Sustainable Management of Mediterranean Forest: Valencian Community Case.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  278. DSS allowed to explain better some technical concepts to non-professional stakeholders.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  279. Use of the DSS has been considered successful by the participating organizations, even though it has.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  280. Germany-Actor Network Theory to Understand Collaborative Decision Support Systems Development in Forest Management Practice.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  281. Stakeholder involvement in DSS design.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  282. Case Handbook‏‎ (1 link)
  283. Http://www.skogforsk.se/‏‎ (1 link)
  284. United States-The forest plan revision process in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  285. EIR‏‎ (1 link)
  286. Austria-Improving forestry extension services for small-scale private landowners.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  287. D.t2‏‎ (1 link)
  288. PractiSFM.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  289. The DSS gave the forest manager the opportunity to experiment how their emphasis towards certain.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  290. LandSim‏‎ (1 link)
  291. Belgium-BoLa a specific sDSS to support land use planning in Flanders.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  292. The ProgettoBosco working methodology, based on cooperation, successive approximations and.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  293. Group participation with knowledgeable people is a good way to ensure that the decision hierarchy is.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  294. Joseph I of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  295. The fact that ProgettoBosco is conceived according to the criteria and indicators of sustainable.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  296. It is necessary to know which data will be use as variables in the models before designing the DSS.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  297. Portugal-Pulpwood Supply Chain Planning in a Portuguese integrated Pulp and Paper Company.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  298. Portugal-Integrating an ecosystem model into SADfLOR Decision Support platform for optimal forest management planning under changing climate in boreal conditions..Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  299. The development of large and enduring systems requires a long term approach.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  300. The scope of the modeling project can change significantly during the project.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  301. Italy A comprehensive system for the forest management planning in Trentino Province‏‎ (1 link)
  302. Belgium-Participative modelling of long-term wood production in the forest complex ‘Bosland’.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  303. Growth and Yield models are a key component of forest DSS.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  304. The kinds of DSS traditionally used to calculate timber harvest levels are now being used to model.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  305. François de Coligny‏‎ (1 link)
  306. PoodyBlep‏‎ (1 link)
  307. No full DSS was used‏‎ (1 link)
  308. The user has to be aware of the possibly large impact that the chosen land indicators and threshold.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  309. Finland-Strategic planning at the national forest administration.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  310. It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  311. Brazil: Short rotation eucalyptus pulp wood plantations.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  312. Spatial variation between regions led to the development of different regional models, which led to.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  313. RoNET-KNA‏‎ (1 link)
  314. Need of flexibilization of analytical tools - no overdesigned tool that provides too much features for the use.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  315. The DSS models built must match the knowledge of the local forest managers, so the ability for local.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  316. Portugal-Developing a management plan for the CHAMUSCA county.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  317. Afonso VI of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  318. United States-Boise-Payette-Sawtooth National Forest Plan.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  319. Portugal-Developing a collaborative management plan for the NIFP in Vale do Sousa.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  320. Peter II of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  321. The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  322. Decision criteria beyond the state of the ecosystem (for example, social values fire risk, economic.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  323. CommonGIS‏‎ (1 link)
  324. Comunità Montana Cadore Longaronese Zoldo‏‎ (1 link)
  325. Models & techniques, Knowledge management‏‎ (1 link)
  326. HEUDESSYS‏‎ (1 link)
  327. Metodology and results are transparent and easy-to-share to non-expert stakeholders.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  328. Model building was rapid, it was assembling the data that took by far the most time.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  329. United States-The restoration strategy of the dry and mesic landscape in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  330. Landscape value‏‎ (1 link)
  331. Students studying forest management planning procedures and processes were very useful ‘guinea pigs’.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  332. T4.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  333. Question: Is it important to organize an efficient communication and coordination among the team members?‏‎ (1 link)
  334. Machinery costs) as well as current wood-selling prices can be modified. The user defines the type (areal or spatially selective)‏‎ (1 link)
  335. Department of Forest and Soil Sciences‏‎ (1 link)
  336. Modular approach helpful in assisting industry uptake.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  337. WWG Manager‏‎ (1 link)
  338. Visualization of the preliminary actor network made the people explicity include the DSS in a planning process.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  339. Getting joint funding from both the forest and environmental sectors can be a successfull for.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  340. WFCM-DSS‏‎ (1 link)
  341. Enlarge the decision space by generating a large set of potential management alternatives.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  342. Enabling the analyses of several ecosystem services (timber and non-timber resources) in one and the.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  343. Operational aspects of the system should be enhanced.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  344. House of Braganza‏‎ (1 link)
  345. Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura - unità di Ricerca per il Monitoraggio e la Pianificazione Forestale‏‎ (1 link)
  346. A more informative output should be generated with clear graphs and maps indicating long-term.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  347. Pareto Frontier Techniques are useful for multi-criteria forest management planning.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  348. ForEco‏‎ (1 link)
  349. As the core of forest DSS are models describing the development of trees and stands (growth and.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  350. Property:Has working group theme:Participation‏‎ (1 link)
  351. Template:DSS description, System design and development‏‎ (1 link)
  352. Need for new models for the later use of a tool.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  353. Spain-Sustainable Management of Mediterranean Forest: Valencian Community Case.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  354. DSS allowed to explain better some technical concepts to non-professional stakeholders.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  355. Use of the DSS has been considered successful by the participating organizations, even though it has.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  356. Landwirtschaft‏‎ (1 link)
  357. Stakeholder involvement in DSS design.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  358. Forest planning problem type Handbook‏‎ (1 link)
  359. SkogForsk‏‎ (1 link)
  360. United States-The forest plan revision process in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  361. EELIS‏‎ (1 link)
  362. Forestry extension services‏‎ (1 link)
  363. Km.t‏‎ (1 link)
  364. DSS for brown bear management‏‎ (1 link)
  365. PractiSFM.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  366. The DSS gave the forest manager the opportunity to experiment how their emphasis towards certain.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  367. Any‏‎ (1 link)
  368. Belgium-BoLa a specific sDSS to support land use planning in Flanders.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  369. The ProgettoBosco working methodology, based on cooperation, successive approximations and.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  370. Group participation with knowledgeable people is a good way to ensure that the decision hierarchy is.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  371. List of Portuguese monarchs‏‎ (1 link)
  372. The fact that ProgettoBosco is conceived according to the criteria and indicators of sustainable.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  373. Università della Tuscia - Italy‏‎ (1 link)
  374. Heureka RegWise‏‎ (1 link)
  375. Portugal-Integrating an ecosystem model into SADfLOR Decision Support platform for optimal forest management planning under changing climate in boreal conditions..Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  376. The development of large and enduring systems requires a long term approach.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  377. Norwegian University of Life Sciences (UMB)‏‎ (1 link)
  378. Belgium-Participative modelling of long-term wood production in the forest complex ‘Bosland’.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  379. Stakeholder involvement.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  380. Requirement of specialized skills can discourage some potential users.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  381. The kinds of DSS traditionally used to calculate timber harvest levels are now being used to model.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  382. Samuel Dufour‏‎ (1 link)
  383. Austral‏‎ (1 link)
  384. Using AHP in combination with other methods (regression‏‎ (1 link)
  385. The user has to be aware of the possibly large impact that the chosen land indicators and threshold.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  386. Finland-Strategic planning at the national forest administration.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  387. MEPAR‏‎ (1 link)
  388. Projection of stand development increases knowledge base.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  389. Brazil: Short rotation eucalyptus pulp wood plantations.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  390. Spatial variation between regions led to the development of different regional models, which led to.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  391. Wise Forms‏‎ (1 link)
  392. Need of flexibilization of analytical tools - no overdesigned tool that provides too much features for the use.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  393. The DSS models built must match the knowledge of the local forest managers, so the ability for local.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  394. Cowberry‏‎ (1 link)
  395. Afonso V of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  396. Lack of proper documentation and support services (manual, website, etc) can severely limit the.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  397. Portugal-Developing a collaborative management plan for the NIFP in Vale do Sousa.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  398. Peter I of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  399. The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  400. Decision criteria beyond the state of the ecosystem (for example, social values fire risk, economic.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  401. Template:DSS description, Concrete application‏‎ (1 link)
  402. Italy-Assessing forest functions at stand scale in a sub-regional forest plan in the Dolomites.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  403. Participation, Knowledge management‏‎ (1 link)
  404. IFFIRES‏‎ (1 link)
  405. Deer‏‎ (1 link)
  406. The design process was rather ad-hoc and sequential, as a result of step-wise funding becoming.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  407. Model building was rapid, it was assembling the data that took by far the most time.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  408. United States-The restoration strategy of the dry and mesic landscape in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  409. Plenty‏‎ (1 link)
  410. Students studying forest management planning procedures and processes were very useful ‘guinea pigs’.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  411. DSS helped document and apply decision criteria consistently, and therefore produced a more.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  412. Question: Is it relevant to consider an adequate programming environment and programming tools for the implementation?‏‎ (1 link)
  413. System costs (personnel expenditure‏‎ (1 link)
  414. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna‏‎ (1 link)
  415. Supports Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDA by AHP and SMART)‏‎ (1 link)
  416. Visualization of the preliminary actor network made the people explicity include the DSS in a planning process.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  417. The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  418. TUZTER‏‎ (1 link)
  419. Embedding a DSS in a GIS software allows obtaining information at different spatial scales using the.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  420. Operational aspects of the system should be enhanced.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  421. House of Braganza-Saxe-Coburg and Gotha‏‎ (1 link)
  422. SIGFOR.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  423. A more informative output should be generated with clear graphs and maps indicating long-term.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  424. Pareto Frontier Techniques are useful for multi-criteria forest management planning.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  425. As the core of forest DSS are models describing the development of trees and stands (growth and.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  426. An optimisation module comparing alternative scenarios based on multi-criteria analysis should be.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  427. Template:DSS description, Technological architecture, integration with other systems‏‎ (1 link)
  428. Need for new models for the later use of a tool.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  429. Spain-Sustainable Management of Mediterranean Forest: Valencian Community Case.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  430. DSS allowed to explain better some technical concepts to non-professional stakeholders.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  431. The DSS usage enabled the planning team to measure the achievement of the restoration goals.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  432. Ministerium für Umwelt‏‎ (1 link)
  433. SIMPLOT‏‎ (1 link)
  434. Lesson Handbook‏‎ (1 link)
  435. Alterra‏‎ (1 link)
  436. United States-The forest plan revision process in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  437. Enlarged decision space.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  438. Sp.t‏‎ (1 link)
  439. EVH‏‎ (1 link)
  440. PractiSFM.Software‏‎ (1 link)
  441. Forest managers have to analyze how their forest management interventions effect the landscape.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  442. DSS for planning of forest operations technology‏‎ (1 link)
  443. New Zealand-Modular Forest Management DSS in NZ.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  444. The ProgettoBosco working methodology, based on cooperation, successive approximations and.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  445. Group participation with knowledgeable people is a good way to ensure that the decision hierarchy is.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  446. Luís I of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  447. The fact that ProgettoBosco is conceived according to the criteria and indicators of sustainable.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  448. Università della Tuscia - Università del Molise‏‎ (1 link)
  449. Spain-An agro-ecological Decision Support Systems for evaluting soil under scenarios of global change.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  450. End user engagement throughout the development and deployment cycle is very important.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  451. The development of large and enduring systems requires a long term approach.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  452. UMB‏‎ (1 link)
  453. Belgium-Participative modelling of long-term wood production in the forest complex ‘Bosland’.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  454. Stakeholder involvement.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  455. Requirement of specialized skills can discourage some potential users.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  456. The kinds of DSS traditionally used to calculate timber harvest levels are now being used to model.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  457. Question: How can stakeholders and users involvement in all phases of the DSS development project being facilitated?‏‎ (1 link)
  458. FMS 2.5‏‎ (1 link)
  459. Value functions‏‎ (1 link)
  460. The user has to be aware of the possibly large impact that the chosen land indicators and threshold.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  461. Finland-Strategic planning at the national forest administration.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  462. Forest register‏‎ (1 link)
  463. Projection of stand development increases knowledge base.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  464. Brazil: Short rotation eucalyptus pulp wood plantations.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  465. Need of a moderator function.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  466. DSS for forest road network extension‏‎ (1 link)
  467. Involvement‏‎ (1 link)
  468. MultiCriteria Risk Analysis (MCRA)‏‎ (1 link)
  469. The DSS models built must match the knowledge of the local forest managers, so the ability for local.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  470. José Borges‏‎ (1 link)
  471. António, Prior of Crato‏‎ (1 link)
  472. Lack of proper documentation and support services (manual, website, etc) can severely limit the.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  473. Portugal-Developing a collaborative management plan for the NIFP in Vale do Sousa.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  474. Philip III of Spain‏‎ (1 link)
  475. Decision process‏‎ (1 link)
  476. Environmental basics and stakeholder opinion are applied.‏‎ (1 link)
  477. Template:DSS description, Data, data model and data management‏‎ (1 link)
  478. Italy-Assessing forest functions at stand scale in a sub-regional forest plan in the Dolomites.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  479. Data mining‏‎ (1 link)
  480. Template:DSS description, User interface and outputs‏‎ (1 link)
  481. Germany-Using GISCAME to test alternative land-use scenarios under climate change in the Upper Elbe Valley.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  482. Deadwood‏‎ (1 link)
  483. The design process was rather ad-hoc and sequential, as a result of step-wise funding becoming.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  484. Model building was rapid, it was assembling the data that took by far the most time.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  485. United States-Watershed Condition Assessment for the Northwest Forest Plan.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  486. What-if‏‎ (1 link)
  487. Students studying forest management planning procedures and processes were very useful ‘guinea pigs’.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  488. DSS helped document and apply decision criteria consistently, and therefore produced a more.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  489. Question: Is it relevant to define a dissemination and commercialization strategy?‏‎ (1 link)
  490. SORSIM‏‎ (1 link)
  491. Application of the DSS‏‎ (1 link)
  492. The use of the DSS improved communication among the planning team by providing a framework of the.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  493. Will be further developed include participatory planning‏‎ (1 link)
  494. The analysis of the actor network interactions allowed to identify the criticalities to be solved in order to develop the collaborative process.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  495. The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  496. VDDT-Path.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  497. Embedding a DSS in a GIS software allows obtaining information at different spatial scales using the.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  498. Operational aspects of the system should be enhanced.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  499. House of Burgundy‏‎ (1 link)
  500. SIGFOR.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)

View (previous 500 | next 500) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)