Wanted pages

From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
Jump to: navigation, search

Showing below up to 500 results starting with #51.

View (previous 500 | next 500) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

  1. STANDPACK‏‎ (4 links)
  2. VDDT‏‎ (4 links)
  3. Simosol‏‎ (4 links)
  4. Biodiversity‏‎ (4 links)
  5. KU Leuven‏‎ (4 links)
  6. Effects of data quality‏‎ (4 links)
  7. Conservation value‏‎ (4 links)
  8. Germany:Actor Network Theory to Understand Collaborative Decision Support Systems Development in Forest Management Practice‏‎ (4 links)
  9. Effects of models‏‎ (4 links)
  10. The restoration strategy of the dry and mesic landscape in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest‏‎ (4 links)
  11. Participative modelling of long-term wood production in the forest complex ‘Bosland’‏‎ (3 links)
  12. Instituto Superior de Agronomia‏‎ (3 links)
  13. Watershed Condition Assessment for the Northwest Forest Plan‏‎ (3 links)
  14. What-if analysis‏‎ (3 links)
  15. Assessing forest functions at stand scale in a sub-regional forest plan in the Dolomites‏‎ (3 links)
  16. AS‏‎ (3 links)
  17. Norwegian University of Life Sciences‏‎ (3 links)
  18. Boise-Payette-Sawtooth National Forest Plan‏‎ (3 links)
  19. Graphics‏‎ (3 links)
  20. Supporting a multi stakeholders decision process in a Portuguese National Forest‏‎ (3 links)
  21. Intelligent agent‏‎ (3 links)
  22. Universidade Técnica de Lisboa.‏‎ (3 links)
  23. Form:Case study‏‎ (3 links)
  24. DSS development‏‎ (3 links)
  25. SOSKLIMA‏‎ (3 links)
  26. …‏‎ (3 links)
  27. SIMANFOR‏‎ (3 links)
  28. Improving forestry extension services for small-scale private landowners‏‎ (3 links)
  29. UML‏‎ (3 links)
  30. Type:Email‏‎ (3 links)
  31. The development and introduction of versatile DSS in Sweden‏‎ (3 links)
  32. Institutionalization‏‎ (3 links)
  33. A Decision Support System for eucalypt forest management under climate change scenarios‏‎ (3 links)
  34. /sandbox‏‎ (3 links)
  35. Integrating an ecosystem model into SADfLOR Decision Support platform for optimal forest management planning under changing climate in boreal conditions.‏‎ (3 links)
  36. The forest plan revision process in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest‏‎ (3 links)
  37. /testcases‏‎ (3 links)
  38. Belgium-Participative modelling of long-term wood production in the forest complex Bosland‏‎ (3 links)
  39. SAPPI FMS‏‎ (3 links)
  40. The history of a successfull forest DSS in Sweden‏‎ (3 links)
  41. Actor Network Theory to Understand Collaborative Decision Support Systems Development in Forest Management Practice‏‎ (3 links)
  42. Template:Documentation/docname‏‎ (3 links)
  43. Modular Forest Management DSS in NZ‏‎ (3 links)
  44. Centro de Estudos Florestais‏‎ (3 links)
  45. Syunev 2004‏‎ (3 links)
  46. An agro-ecological Decision Support Systems for evaluting soil under scenarios of global change‏‎ (3 links)
  47. Template:Pp-meta‏‎ (3 links)
  48. System requirement and design‏‎ (2 links)
  49. GBNL‏‎ (2 links)
  50. Analysis of logging residues chain for a sustainable bioenergy production in Alta Val di Non‏‎ (2 links)
  51. Bottom up approach in designing software architecture and features (OOP)‏‎ (2 links)
  52. PractiSFM multi-resource inventory and decision support for private forest owners‏‎ (2 links)
  53. RODAL-ARBOREX‏‎ (2 links)
  54. Wolschart‏‎ (2 links)
  55. Forester GIS‏‎ (2 links)
  56. Coming soon...‏‎ (2 links)
  57. ProgettoBosco a data-driven DSS for forest planning: an application in Abruzzo Region‏‎ (2 links)
  58. Heureka.Knowledge management process‏‎ (2 links)
  59. Enterprise Architecture‏‎ (2 links)
  60. Mushrooms‏‎ (2 links)
  61. BoLa a specific sDSS to support land use planning in Flanders‏‎ (2 links)
  62. GIS and ME‏‎ (2 links)
  63. ---‏‎ (2 links)
  64. SADfLOR v pp 1.0‏‎ (2 links)
  65. PrOFA‏‎ (2 links)
  66. Gaya - SGIS‏‎ (2 links)
  67. 1) user requirements analysis following Delphi approach‏‎ (2 links)
  68. ZEUS‏‎ (2 links)
  69. Developing a collaborative management plan for the NIFP in Vale do Sousa‏‎ (2 links)
  70. To be filled‏‎ (2 links)
  71. Sustainable Management of Mediterranean Forest: Valencian Community Case‏‎ (2 links)
  72. 2) CA‏‎ (2 links)
  73. Developing a management plan for the CHAMUSCA county‏‎ (2 links)
  74. Tobe filled‏‎ (2 links)
  75. Tactical/operational forest planning in a Portuguese integrated Pulp and Paper Company‏‎ (2 links)
  76. GIS‏‎ (2 links)
  77. FIS‏‎ (2 links)
  78. 3) version control and buck tracking system‏‎ (2 links)
  79. SCRUM/Agile‏‎ (2 links)
  80. Institute of Silviculture‏‎ (2 links)
  81. 4) iterative development since 2007 with permanent testing and user feed-back‏‎ (2 links)
  82. ETCAP‏‎ (2 links)
  83. User training individual to provide optimal mix of Apps‏‎ (2 links)
  84. DSS Template‏‎ (2 links)
  85. A comprehensive system for forest management planning in Trentino Province‏‎ (2 links)
  86. 5) Used for regional planning‏‎ (2 links)
  87. TAKARNET‏‎ (2 links)
  88. Integrating wood quality considerations in landscape-level forest planning‏‎ (2 links)
  89. USDA Forest Service‏‎ (2 links)
  90. Example DSS/SHRIMP‏‎ (2 links)
  91. 6) Version management and feed-back collection handled by the software enterprise PiSolution GmbH‏‎ (2 links)
  92. Allocation of slope protection measures‏‎ (2 links)
  93. JOVOKEP‏‎ (2 links)
  94. Template:Transclude‏‎ (2 links)
  95. US Department of Agriculture - Forest Service‏‎ (2 links)
  96. 7) now adaptation for land use planning in Western Africa‏‎ (2 links)
  97. HedeDanmark‏‎ (2 links)
  98. Need of a moderator function.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  99. Portugal-Developing a management plan for the CHAMUSCA county.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  100. Need of flexibilization of analytical tools - no overdesigned tool that provides too much features for the use.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  101. Providing procedures and structure for data flow from selection of field sample, performing field.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  102. Afonso IV of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  103. United States-Boise-Payette-Sawtooth National Forest Plan.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  104. Decision criteria beyond the state of the ecosystem (for example, social values fire risk, economic.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  105. Dss development process, Participation, Knowledge management‏‎ (1 link)
  106. Pedro V of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  107. The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  108. The scope of the modeling project can change significantly during the project.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  109. Italy-ProgettoBosco a data-driven DSS for forest planning: an application in Abruzzo Region.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  110. Research institution‏‎ (1 link)
  111. Metsähallitus‏‎ (1 link)
  112. Adapting the software to make it possible to easily include also the output of other mechanistic.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  113. Italy-A comprehensive system for forest management planning in Trentino Province.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  114. Growth and Yield models are a key component of forest DSS.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  115. Type:Record‏‎ (1 link)
  116. University College Dublin‏‎ (1 link)
  117. Etc) may decrease the number of comparisons‏‎ (1 link)
  118. Spatial variation between regions led to the development of different regional models, which led to.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  119. O+BN‏‎ (1 link)
  120. Fast‏‎ (1 link)
  121. Cases‏‎ (1 link)
  122. It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  123. Visualization of the preliminary actor network made the people explicity include the DSS in a planning process.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  124. Getting joint funding from both the forest and environmental sectors can be a successfull for.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  125. Property:Additional information‏‎ (1 link)
  126. Enlarge the decision space by generating a large set of potential management alternatives.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  127. Enabling the analyses of several ecosystem services (timber and non-timber resources) in one and the.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  128. A more informative output should be generated with clear graphs and maps indicating long-term.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  129. Henry of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  130. Ongoing development‏‎ (1 link)
  131. Property:Has working group theme:Knowledge management‏‎ (1 link)
  132. University of Copenhagen‏‎ (1 link)
  133. Pareto Frontier Techniques are useful for multi-criteria forest management planning.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  134. SIPAFIT sub-systems have been useful in training activities, and can be very useful to explain and.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  135. A financial analysis is an important component in the discussion about the preferences of different.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  136. A a test lesson.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  137. ForestGales.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  138. Metodology and results are transparent and easy-to-share to non-expert stakeholders.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  139. Template:DSS description, Support of knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  140. T4.Software identification‏‎ (1 link)
  141. Alternative silvicultural prescriptions can be computed or an already existing scenario modified. Thereby the user is supported by the scenario manager. For a given scenario‏‎ (1 link)
  142. United States-The restoration strategy of the dry and mesic landscape in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  143. The choice to develop the system in an Excel environment was based on the status of computer.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  144. Modular approach helpful in assisting industry uptake.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  145. Tosia‏‎ (1 link)
  146. Question: Is it important to define the responsibilities and ownership for the DSS development process?‏‎ (1 link)
  147. Using Actor Network Theory in the design stage can help in understanding the dynamism of the network.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  148. Voronov 2010‏‎ (1 link)
  149. Template:STSM Opportunity‏‎ (1 link)
  150. The DSS gave the forest manager the opportunity to experiment how their emphasis towards certain.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  151. Group participation with knowledgeable people is a good way to ensure that the decision hierarchy is.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  152. Belgium-BoLa a specific sDSS to support land use planning in Flanders.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  153. The ProgettoBosco working methodology, based on cooperation, successive approximations and.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  154. It is necessary to know which data will be use as variables in the models before designing the DSS.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  155. John V of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  156. Portugal-A Decision Support System for eucalypt forest management under climate change scenarios.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  157. Need for new models for the later use of a tool.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  158. Portugal-Pulpwood Supply Chain Planning in a Portuguese integrated Pulp and Paper Company.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  159. Portugal-Integrating an ecosystem model into SADfLOR Decision Support platform for optimal forest management planning under changing climate in boreal conditions..Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  160. Use of the DSS has been considered successful by the participating organizations, even though it has.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  161. Stakeholder involvement in DSS design.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  162. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica y del Medio Natural‏‎ (1 link)
  163. Case Lessons involving software development on subform‏‎ (1 link)
  164. Form:Social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  165. Agricultural Research Council (CRA)‏‎ (1 link)
  166. HSS‏‎ (1 link)
  167. Germany-Actor Network Theory to Understand Collaborative Decision Support Systems Development in Forest Management Practice.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  168. MatrixGen.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  169. Analysis at the landscape level allowed the integration of concerns about multiple resources as well.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  170. Firecol‏‎ (1 link)
  171. MESTA.TATTI‏‎ (1 link)
  172. Austria-Improving forestry extension services for small-scale private landowners.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  173. ATestCase.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  174. Need of a moderator function.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  175. Portugal-Developing a management plan for the CHAMUSCA county.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  176. Need of flexibilization of analytical tools - no overdesigned tool that provides too much features for the use.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  177. KUBIK.Software‏‎ (1 link)
  178. Portugal-Developing a collaborative management plan for the NIFP in Vale do Sousa.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  179. Afonso I of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  180. United States-Boise-Payette-Sawtooth National Forest Plan.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  181. Decision criteria beyond the state of the ecosystem (for example, social values fire risk, economic.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  182. Models & techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  183. Peter III of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  184. The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  185. The scope of the modeling project can change significantly during the project.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  186. Italy-ProgettoBosco a data-driven DSS for forest planning: an application in Abruzzo Region.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  187. ForMIS.Software‏‎ (1 link)
  188. MAPSS.Software‏‎ (1 link)
  189. The kinds of DSS traditionally used to calculate timber harvest levels are now being used to model.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  190. Belgium-Participative modelling of long-term wood production in the forest complex ‘Bosland’.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  191. Growth and Yield models are a key component of forest DSS.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  192. Has related country study‏‎ (1 link)
  193. The user has to be aware of the possibly large impact that the chosen land indicators and threshold.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  194. Heureka PlanWise‏‎ (1 link)
  195. Herbicide advisor‏‎ (1 link)
  196. In this paper‏‎ (1 link)
  197. Spatial variation between regions led to the development of different regional models, which led to.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  198. Wildalpen/KATER II‏‎ (1 link)
  199. Fox‏‎ (1 link)
  200. Population dynamics‏‎ (1 link)
  201. It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  202. Visualization of the preliminary actor network made the people explicity include the DSS in a planning process.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  203. Getting joint funding from both the forest and environmental sectors can be a successfull for.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  204. Operational aspects of the system should be enhanced.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  205. Involving local stakeholders in ranking the functions allowed to show them tangibly how their‏‎ (1 link)
  206. Enlarge the decision space by generating a large set of potential management alternatives.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  207. Enabling the analyses of several ecosystem services (timber and non-timber resources) in one and the.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  208. A more informative output should be generated with clear graphs and maps indicating long-term.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  209. House of Aviz‏‎ (1 link)
  210. CRA-MPF - Trento - Italy‏‎ (1 link)
  211. Property:Has working group theme:Models & techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  212. Pareto Frontier Techniques are useful for multi-criteria forest management planning.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  213. SIPAFIT sub-systems have been useful in training activities, and can be very useful to explain and.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  214. A financial analysis is an important component in the discussion about the preferences of different.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  215. Recreation‏‎ (1 link)
  216. FEIDESSYS‏‎ (1 link)
  217. Metodology and results are transparent and easy-to-share to non-expert stakeholders.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  218. Template:DSS description, Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  219. T4.Support of Knowledge Management‏‎ (1 link)
  220. Intensity (amount of timber) and temporal progression (period) of a silvicultural treatment.‏‎ (1 link)
  221. United States-The restoration strategy of the dry and mesic landscape in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  222. Students studying forest management planning procedures and processes were very useful ‘guinea pigs’.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  223. Modular approach helpful in assisting industry uptake.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  224. Question: Is it important to facilitate a process for the problem definition before starting design and programming?‏‎ (1 link)
  225. At the Department of Forest and Soil Sciences‏‎ (1 link)
  226. PractiSFM.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  227. The DSS gave the forest manager the opportunity to experiment how their emphasis towards certain.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  228. Group participation with knowledgeable people is a good way to ensure that the decision hierarchy is.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  229. Belgium-BoLa a specific sDSS to support land use planning in Flanders.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  230. The ProgettoBosco working methodology, based on cooperation, successive approximations and.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  231. It is necessary to know which data will be use as variables in the models before designing the DSS.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  232. Joseph I of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  233. The fact that ProgettoBosco is conceived according to the criteria and indicators of sustainable.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  234. Need for new models for the later use of a tool.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  235. Portugal-Pulpwood Supply Chain Planning in a Portuguese integrated Pulp and Paper Company.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  236. Portugal-Integrating an ecosystem model into SADfLOR Decision Support platform for optimal forest management planning under changing climate in boreal conditions..Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  237. Use of the DSS has been considered successful by the participating organizations, even though it has.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  238. Stakeholder involvement in DSS design.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  239. Spain-Sustainable Management of Mediterranean Forest: Valencian Community Case.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  240. DSS allowed to explain better some technical concepts to non-professional stakeholders.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  241. Http://www.skogforsk.se/‏‎ (1 link)
  242. EIR‏‎ (1 link)
  243. Germany-Actor Network Theory to Understand Collaborative Decision Support Systems Development in Forest Management Practice.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  244. Case Handbook‏‎ (1 link)
  245. D.t2‏‎ (1 link)
  246. United States-The forest plan revision process in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  247. Austria-Improving forestry extension services for small-scale private landowners.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  248. LandSim‏‎ (1 link)
  249. Brazil: Short rotation eucalyptus pulp wood plantations.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  250. Portugal-Developing a management plan for the CHAMUSCA county.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  251. Need of flexibilization of analytical tools - no overdesigned tool that provides too much features for the use.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  252. The DSS models built must match the knowledge of the local forest managers, so the ability for local.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  253. Portugal-Developing a collaborative management plan for the NIFP in Vale do Sousa.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  254. Afonso VI of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  255. United States-Boise-Payette-Sawtooth National Forest Plan.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  256. Decision criteria beyond the state of the ecosystem (for example, social values fire risk, economic.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  257. Models & techniques, Knowledge management‏‎ (1 link)
  258. Peter II of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  259. The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  260. The scope of the modeling project can change significantly during the project.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  261. Comunità Montana Cadore Longaronese Zoldo‏‎ (1 link)
  262. The development of large and enduring systems requires a long term approach.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  263. CommonGIS‏‎ (1 link)
  264. The kinds of DSS traditionally used to calculate timber harvest levels are now being used to model.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  265. PoodyBlep‏‎ (1 link)
  266. Belgium-Participative modelling of long-term wood production in the forest complex ‘Bosland’.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  267. Growth and Yield models are a key component of forest DSS.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  268. Italy A comprehensive system for the forest management planning in Trentino Province‏‎ (1 link)
  269. The user has to be aware of the possibly large impact that the chosen land indicators and threshold.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  270. François de Coligny‏‎ (1 link)
  271. No full DSS was used‏‎ (1 link)
  272. Spatial variation between regions led to the development of different regional models, which led to.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  273. RoNET-KNA‏‎ (1 link)
  274. Finland-Strategic planning at the national forest administration.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  275. It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  276. Visualization of the preliminary actor network made the people explicity include the DSS in a planning process.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  277. Getting joint funding from both the forest and environmental sectors can be a successfull for.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  278. Operational aspects of the system should be enhanced.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  279. Enlarge the decision space by generating a large set of potential management alternatives.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  280. Enabling the analyses of several ecosystem services (timber and non-timber resources) in one and the.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  281. A more informative output should be generated with clear graphs and maps indicating long-term.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  282. ForEco‏‎ (1 link)
  283. House of Braganza‏‎ (1 link)
  284. Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura - unità di Ricerca per il Monitoraggio e la Pianificazione Forestale‏‎ (1 link)
  285. Property:Has working group theme:Participation‏‎ (1 link)
  286. Pareto Frontier Techniques are useful for multi-criteria forest management planning.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  287. As the core of forest DSS are models describing the development of trees and stands (growth and.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  288. Model building was rapid, it was assembling the data that took by far the most time.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  289. Landscape value‏‎ (1 link)
  290. HEUDESSYS‏‎ (1 link)
  291. Metodology and results are transparent and easy-to-share to non-expert stakeholders.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  292. Template:DSS description, System design and development‏‎ (1 link)
  293. T4.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  294. Machinery costs) as well as current wood-selling prices can be modified. The user defines the type (areal or spatially selective)‏‎ (1 link)
  295. United States-The restoration strategy of the dry and mesic landscape in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  296. Students studying forest management planning procedures and processes were very useful ‘guinea pigs’.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  297. Modular approach helpful in assisting industry uptake.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  298. WWG Manager‏‎ (1 link)
  299. Question: Is it important to organize an efficient communication and coordination among the team members?‏‎ (1 link)
  300. Department of Forest and Soil Sciences‏‎ (1 link)
  301. WFCM-DSS‏‎ (1 link)
  302. PractiSFM.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  303. The DSS gave the forest manager the opportunity to experiment how their emphasis towards certain.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  304. Group participation with knowledgeable people is a good way to ensure that the decision hierarchy is.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  305. Belgium-BoLa a specific sDSS to support land use planning in Flanders.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  306. The ProgettoBosco working methodology, based on cooperation, successive approximations and.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  307. Università della Tuscia - Italy‏‎ (1 link)
  308. List of Portuguese monarchs‏‎ (1 link)
  309. The fact that ProgettoBosco is conceived according to the criteria and indicators of sustainable.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  310. Need for new models for the later use of a tool.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  311. Heureka RegWise‏‎ (1 link)
  312. Portugal-Integrating an ecosystem model into SADfLOR Decision Support platform for optimal forest management planning under changing climate in boreal conditions..Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  313. Use of the DSS has been considered successful by the participating organizations, even though it has.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  314. Stakeholder involvement in DSS design.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  315. Spain-Sustainable Management of Mediterranean Forest: Valencian Community Case.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  316. DSS allowed to explain better some technical concepts to non-professional stakeholders.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  317. SkogForsk‏‎ (1 link)
  318. EELIS‏‎ (1 link)
  319. Landwirtschaft‏‎ (1 link)
  320. Forest planning problem type Handbook‏‎ (1 link)
  321. Km.t‏‎ (1 link)
  322. DSS for brown bear management‏‎ (1 link)
  323. United States-The forest plan revision process in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  324. Forestry extension services‏‎ (1 link)
  325. Any‏‎ (1 link)
  326. Brazil: Short rotation eucalyptus pulp wood plantations.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  327. Cowberry‏‎ (1 link)
  328. Need of flexibilization of analytical tools - no overdesigned tool that provides too much features for the use.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  329. The DSS models built must match the knowledge of the local forest managers, so the ability for local.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  330. Portugal-Developing a collaborative management plan for the NIFP in Vale do Sousa.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  331. Afonso V of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  332. Lack of proper documentation and support services (manual, website, etc) can severely limit the.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  333. Decision criteria beyond the state of the ecosystem (for example, social values fire risk, economic.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  334. Participation, Knowledge management‏‎ (1 link)
  335. Peter I of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  336. The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  337. Norwegian University of Life Sciences (UMB)‏‎ (1 link)
  338. Stakeholder involvement.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  339. Italy-Assessing forest functions at stand scale in a sub-regional forest plan in the Dolomites.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  340. The development of large and enduring systems requires a long term approach.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  341. Template:DSS description, Concrete application‏‎ (1 link)
  342. The kinds of DSS traditionally used to calculate timber harvest levels are now being used to model.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  343. Austral‏‎ (1 link)
  344. Belgium-Participative modelling of long-term wood production in the forest complex ‘Bosland’.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  345. Requirement of specialized skills can discourage some potential users.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  346. The user has to be aware of the possibly large impact that the chosen land indicators and threshold.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  347. MEPAR‏‎ (1 link)
  348. Samuel Dufour‏‎ (1 link)
  349. Using AHP in combination with other methods (regression‏‎ (1 link)
  350. Spatial variation between regions led to the development of different regional models, which led to.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  351. Wise Forms‏‎ (1 link)
  352. Finland-Strategic planning at the national forest administration.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  353. Projection of stand development increases knowledge base.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  354. Visualization of the preliminary actor network made the people explicity include the DSS in a planning process.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  355. The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  356. Operational aspects of the system should be enhanced.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  357. Embedding a DSS in a GIS software allows obtaining information at different spatial scales using the.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  358. A more informative output should be generated with clear graphs and maps indicating long-term.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  359. House of Braganza-Saxe-Coburg and Gotha‏‎ (1 link)
  360. SIGFOR.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  361. An optimisation module comparing alternative scenarios based on multi-criteria analysis should be.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  362. Deer‏‎ (1 link)
  363. Pareto Frontier Techniques are useful for multi-criteria forest management planning.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  364. As the core of forest DSS are models describing the development of trees and stands (growth and.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  365. Model building was rapid, it was assembling the data that took by far the most time.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  366. Plenty‏‎ (1 link)
  367. IFFIRES‏‎ (1 link)
  368. The design process was rather ad-hoc and sequential, as a result of step-wise funding becoming.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  369. Template:DSS description, Technological architecture, integration with other systems‏‎ (1 link)
  370. DSS helped document and apply decision criteria consistently, and therefore produced a more.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  371. System costs (personnel expenditure‏‎ (1 link)
  372. United States-The restoration strategy of the dry and mesic landscape in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  373. Students studying forest management planning procedures and processes were very useful ‘guinea pigs’.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  374. Supports Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDA by AHP and SMART)‏‎ (1 link)
  375. Question: Is it relevant to consider an adequate programming environment and programming tools for the implementation?‏‎ (1 link)
  376. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna‏‎ (1 link)
  377. TUZTER‏‎ (1 link)
  378. DSS for planning of forest operations technology‏‎ (1 link)
  379. PractiSFM.Software‏‎ (1 link)
  380. Forest managers have to analyze how their forest management interventions effect the landscape.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  381. Group participation with knowledgeable people is a good way to ensure that the decision hierarchy is.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  382. New Zealand-Modular Forest Management DSS in NZ.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  383. The ProgettoBosco working methodology, based on cooperation, successive approximations and.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  384. Università della Tuscia - Università del Molise‏‎ (1 link)
  385. Luís I of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  386. The fact that ProgettoBosco is conceived according to the criteria and indicators of sustainable.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  387. Need for new models for the later use of a tool.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  388. Spain-An agro-ecological Decision Support Systems for evaluting soil under scenarios of global change.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  389. End user engagement throughout the development and deployment cycle is very important.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  390. The DSS usage enabled the planning team to measure the achievement of the restoration goals.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  391. SIMPLOT‏‎ (1 link)
  392. Spain-Sustainable Management of Mediterranean Forest: Valencian Community Case.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  393. DSS allowed to explain better some technical concepts to non-professional stakeholders.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  394. Alterra‏‎ (1 link)
  395. Ministerium für Umwelt‏‎ (1 link)
  396. Lesson Handbook‏‎ (1 link)
  397. Sp.t‏‎ (1 link)
  398. EVH‏‎ (1 link)
  399. United States-The forest plan revision process in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  400. Enlarged decision space.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  401. Brazil: Short rotation eucalyptus pulp wood plantations.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  402. José Borges‏‎ (1 link)
  403. Involvement‏‎ (1 link)
  404. The DSS models built must match the knowledge of the local forest managers, so the ability for local.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  405. Portugal-Developing a collaborative management plan for the NIFP in Vale do Sousa.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  406. António, Prior of Crato‏‎ (1 link)
  407. Lack of proper documentation and support services (manual, website, etc) can severely limit the.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  408. Environmental basics and stakeholder opinion are applied.‏‎ (1 link)
  409. Data mining‏‎ (1 link)
  410. Philip III of Spain‏‎ (1 link)
  411. Decision process‏‎ (1 link)
  412. UMB‏‎ (1 link)
  413. Stakeholder involvement.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  414. Italy-Assessing forest functions at stand scale in a sub-regional forest plan in the Dolomites.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  415. The development of large and enduring systems requires a long term approach.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  416. Template:DSS description, Data, data model and data management‏‎ (1 link)
  417. The kinds of DSS traditionally used to calculate timber harvest levels are now being used to model.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  418. FMS 2.5‏‎ (1 link)
  419. Belgium-Participative modelling of long-term wood production in the forest complex ‘Bosland’.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  420. Requirement of specialized skills can discourage some potential users.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  421. The user has to be aware of the possibly large impact that the chosen land indicators and threshold.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  422. Forest register‏‎ (1 link)
  423. Question: How can stakeholders and users involvement in all phases of the DSS development project being facilitated?‏‎ (1 link)
  424. Value functions‏‎ (1 link)
  425. Need of a moderator function.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  426. DSS for forest road network extension‏‎ (1 link)
  427. Finland-Strategic planning at the national forest administration.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  428. MultiCriteria Risk Analysis (MCRA)‏‎ (1 link)
  429. Projection of stand development increases knowledge base.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  430. The analysis of the actor network interactions allowed to identify the criticalities to be solved in order to develop the collaborative process.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  431. The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  432. Operational aspects of the system should be enhanced.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  433. VDDT-Path.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  434. Embedding a DSS in a GIS software allows obtaining information at different spatial scales using the.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  435. Finnish Forest Research Institute‏‎ (1 link)
  436. Pest control activity scheduling‏‎ (1 link)
  437. House of Burgundy‏‎ (1 link)
  438. SIGFOR.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  439. An optimisation module comparing alternative scenarios based on multi-criteria analysis should be.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  440. Deadwood‏‎ (1 link)
  441. Eurac research - Fabio Pastorella‏‎ (1 link)
  442. As the core of forest DSS are models describing the development of trees and stands (growth and.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  443. Model building was rapid, it was assembling the data that took by far the most time.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  444. What-if‏‎ (1 link)
  445. Germany-Using GISCAME to test alternative land-use scenarios under climate change in the Upper Elbe Valley.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  446. The design process was rather ad-hoc and sequential, as a result of step-wise funding becoming.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  447. Template:DSS description, User interface and outputs‏‎ (1 link)
  448. DSS helped document and apply decision criteria consistently, and therefore produced a more.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  449. SORSIM‏‎ (1 link)
  450. United States-Watershed Condition Assessment for the Northwest Forest Plan.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  451. Students studying forest management planning procedures and processes were very useful ‘guinea pigs’.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  452. The use of the DSS improved communication among the planning team by providing a framework of the.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  453. Will be further developed include participatory planning‏‎ (1 link)
  454. Question: Is it relevant to define a dissemination and commercialization strategy?‏‎ (1 link)
  455. Application of the DSS‏‎ (1 link)
  456. National Game Inventory‏‎ (1 link)
  457. PractiSFM.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  458. Forest managers have to analyze how their forest management interventions effect the landscape.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  459. Portugal-Tactical/operational forest planning in a Portuguese integrated Pulp and Paper Company.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  460. New Zealand-Modular Forest Management DSS in NZ.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  461. The activation of an iterative process through periodical meetings permitted to all the stakeholders.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  462. Results are always strongly dependent on the quality of the underlying data.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  463. Manuel II of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  464. The fact that ProgettoBosco is conceived according to the criteria and indicators of sustainable.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  465. Running the DSS required special skills, therefore the local planning team required considerable.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  466. Spain-An agro-ecological Decision Support Systems for evaluting soil under scenarios of global change.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  467. End user engagement throughout the development and deployment cycle is very important.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  468. The DSS usage enabled the planning team to measure the achievement of the restoration goals.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  469. Windthrow risk model‏‎ (1 link)
  470. Spain-Sustainable Management of Mediterranean Forest: Valencian Community Case.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  471. DSS allowed to explain better some technical concepts to non-professional stakeholders.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  472. EFI‏‎ (1 link)
  473. FORPLAN‏‎ (1 link)
  474. Und Fursten‏‎ (1 link)
  475. OpTimber-LP.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  476. T2.s‏‎ (1 link)
  477. ManForFirE‏‎ (1 link)
  478. United States-The forest plan revision process in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  479. Enlarged decision space.Description of DSS development‏‎ (1 link)
  480. Brazil: Short rotation eucalyptus pulp wood plantations.Social participation process‏‎ (1 link)
  481. The tracing of the current actor network interactions made the group realize that they need a different kind of stakeholders from what they previously thought.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  482. The DSS models built must match the knowledge of the local forest managers, so the ability for local.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  483. Beatrice of Portugal‏‎ (1 link)
  484. Lack of proper documentation and support services (manual, website, etc) can severely limit the.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  485. GISCAME is made for either mulit-participant scenario design or - by use of the CA - for scenario design depending from integrative transition probabilities for which starting conditions‏‎ (1 link)
  486. Philip II of Spain‏‎ (1 link)
  487. SIPAFIT can act sometimes as a referee to settle arguments among experts, users and stakeholders.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  488. Despite the widely use and acceptance of the DSS there was still a lack of expertise to.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  489. Stakeholder involvement.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  490. Italy-Assessing forest functions at stand scale in a sub-regional forest plan in the Dolomites.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  491. The development of large and enduring systems requires a long term approach.Support of social participation‏‎ (1 link)
  492. Template:DSS description, Documentation‏‎ (1 link)
  493. From a management perspective, to avoid the complication of testing something new, the models used.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  494. HPS 2.5‏‎ (1 link)
  495. Sweden-The development and introduction of versatile DSS in Sweden.Decision support techniques‏‎ (1 link)
  496. Requirement of specialized skills can discourage some potential users.Knowledge management process‏‎ (1 link)
  497. UNISOMA‏‎ (1 link)
  498. WISDOM‏‎ (1 link)
  499. Question: How can the expectations of all parties involved in the process being managed?‏‎ (1 link)
  500. Web-HIPRE was used for the AHP. Since then‏‎ (1 link)

View (previous 500 | next 500) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

Retrieved from "http://fp0804.emu.ee/wiki/index.php/Special:WantedPages"