Difference between revisions of "The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be"
From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) (Forsys_add_wg_subthemes.py) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Lesson | {{Lesson | ||
|ID=67 | |ID=67 | ||
| − | |||
|Has statement=The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be easily shared with others, so this process required considerably more time and effort than anticipated | |Has statement=The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be easily shared with others, so this process required considerably more time and effort than anticipated | ||
|Has domain=User interface and outputs | |Has domain=User interface and outputs | ||
| + | |Has DSS development stage=Use | ||
|Has decision stage=design, choice | |Has decision stage=design, choice | ||
|Has related DSS=EMDS | |Has related DSS=EMDS | ||
|Has related case=United States-Watershed Condition Assessment for the Northwest Forest Plan | |Has related case=United States-Watershed Condition Assessment for the Northwest Forest Plan | ||
| − | |Has working group theme= | + | |Has working group theme=Knowledge management, Participation |
|Has DSS development=The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be.Description of DSS development | |Has DSS development=The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be.Description of DSS development | ||
|Has decision support techniques=The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be.Decision support techniques | |Has decision support techniques=The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be.Decision support techniques | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
|Has researcher role=Decision analyst, Modeler | |Has researcher role=Decision analyst, Modeler | ||
|Has user role=Forest manager | |Has user role=Forest manager | ||
| − | |Has | + | |Has flag=yellow |
}} | }} | ||
| + | [[Wg3::Application]] [[Wg3::Transfer]] | ||
Latest revision as of 12:15, 17 September 2013
Lesson
| ID | 67 |
|---|---|
| Has statement | The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be easily shared with others, so this process required considerably more time and effort than anticipated |
| Has evidence | |
| Has consequences | |
| Has recommendation for action | |
| Has domain | User interface and outputs |
| Has DSS development stage | Use |
| Has decision stage | design, choice |
| Has temporal scale | |
| Has spatial context | |
| Has spatial scale | |
| Has objectives dimension | |
| Has goods and services dimension | |
| Has decision making dimension | |
| Has country | |
| Has reference | |
| Has related DSS | EMDS |
| Has related case | United States-Watershed Condition Assessment for the Northwest Forest Plan |
| Has related lesson | |
| Has other relevant information | |
| Has working group theme | Knowledge management, Participation |
| Has DSS development | The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be.Description of DSS development |
| Has decision support techniques | The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be.Decision support techniques |
| Has knowledge management processes | The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be.Knowledge management process |
| Has support for social participation | The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be.Support of social participation |
| Has actor perspective | Facilitator, Researcher |
| Has researcher role | Decision analyst, Modeler |
| Has user role | Forest manager |
| Has developer role |
