Difference between revisions of "Voting approaches can successfully be applied to participatory planning of forestry"
From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) (Seans automated transfer) |
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) (Forsys_change_property_values.py) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|Has consequences=Ability to deal with ordinal preferences of decision makers and ordinal evaluation data on alternatives, comprehensive and easy to interpret, making the decision support process transparent and quick to implement even with large groups of people. | |Has consequences=Ability to deal with ordinal preferences of decision makers and ordinal evaluation data on alternatives, comprehensive and easy to interpret, making the decision support process transparent and quick to implement even with large groups of people. | ||
|Has recommendation for action=The implementation of the DSS needs to take into account the ability of participants to understand the DSS and its output. | |Has recommendation for action=The implementation of the DSS needs to take into account the ability of participants to understand the DSS and its output. | ||
| − | |Has domain= | + | |Has domain=User interface and outputs |
|Has temporal scale=Long term (strategic), Medium term (tactical), Short term (operational) | |Has temporal scale=Long term (strategic), Medium term (tactical), Short term (operational) | ||
|Has spatial context=Non spatial, Spatial with neighbourhood interrelations, Spatial with no neighbourhood interrelations | |Has spatial context=Non spatial, Spatial with neighbourhood interrelations, Spatial with no neighbourhood interrelations | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
|Has stakeholder involvement= | |Has stakeholder involvement= | ||
|Has system testing= | |Has system testing= | ||
| + | |Has DSS development stage=Use | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 08:06, 30 July 2013
Lesson
| ID | |
|---|---|
| Has statement | Voting approaches can successfully be applied to participatory planning of forestry |
| Has evidence | (See review article) |
| Has consequences | Ability to deal with ordinal preferences of decision makers and ordinal evaluation data on alternatives, comprehensive and easy to interpret, making the decision support process transparent and quick to implement even with large groups of people. |
| Has recommendation for action | The implementation of the DSS needs to take into account the ability of participants to understand the DSS and its output. |
| Has domain | User interface and outputs |
| Has DSS development stage | Use |
| Has decision stage | |
| Has temporal scale | Long term (strategic), Medium term (tactical), Short term (operational) |
| Has spatial context | Non spatial, Spatial with neighbourhood interrelations, Spatial with no neighbourhood interrelations |
| Has spatial scale | Forest level, Regional/national level, Stand level |
| Has objectives dimension | Multiple objectives |
| Has goods and services dimension | Market non-wood products, Market services, Market wood products, Non-market services |
| Has decision making dimension | More than one decision maker/stakeholder |
| Has country | Finland |
| Has reference | Kangas, A., Laukkanen, S., Kangas, J., 2006. Social choice theory and its applications in sustainable forest management—a review. Forest Policy and Economics 9, 77– 92. |
| Has related DSS | |
| Has related case | |
| Has related lesson | |
| Has other relevant information | |
| Has working group theme | |
| Has DSS development | |
| Has decision support techniques | |
| Has knowledge management processes | |
| Has support for social participation | |
| Has actor perspective | Researcher |
| Has researcher role | Decision analyst |
| Has user role | |
| Has developer role |
