Information for "Template:Lesson"

From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS

Basic information

Display title	Template:Lesson
Default sort key	Lesson
Page length (in bytes)	3,891
Page ID	1148
Page content language	English (en)
Indexing by robots	Allowed
Number of views	853
Number of redirects to this page	0

Page protection

Edit	Allow all users
Move	Allow all users

Edit history

Page creator	Semantic.bot (Talk | contribs)
Date of page creation	18:26, 17 November 2012
Latest editor	SeanGordon (Talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit	04:32, 28 June 2013
Total number of edits	7
Total number of distinct authors	2
Recent number of edits (within past 91 days)	0
Recent number of distinct authors	0

Page properties

Pages transcluded on (90)

Templates used on this page: A financial analysis is an important component in the discussion about the preferences of different (view source) A more informative output should be generated with clear graphs and maps indicating long-term (view source) Adapting the software to make it possible to easily include also the output of other mechanistic (view source) Afforestion and deforestation options should be included in the management options (view source) An optimisation module comparing alternative scenarios based on multi-criteria analysis should be (view source) Analysis at the landscape level allowed the integration of concerns about multiple resources as well (view source) DSS allowed to explain better some technical concepts to non-professional stakeholders (view source) DSS can help in varying the treatment according to more than one forest function (view source) DSS helped document and apply decision criteria consistently, and therefore produced a more (view source) Decision criteria beyond the state of the ecosystem (for example, social values fire risk, economic (view source) Embedding a DSS in a GIS software allows obtaining information at different spatial scales using the (view source) Enabling the analyses of several ecosystem services (view source) End user engagement throughout the development and deployment cycle is very important (view source) Enlarge the decision space by generating a large set of potential management alternatives (view source) Forest managers have to analyze how their forest management interventions effect the landscape (view source) Growth and Yield models are a key component of forest DSS (view source) It should be possible to specify the rotation time of a species not only by age but also by target (view source) It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development (view source) Lack of proper documentation and support services (manual, website, etc) can severely limit the (view source) Model building was rapid, it was assembling the data that took by far the most time (view source) Modular approach helpful in assisting industry uptake (view source) Multiple DSS are often needed to meet complex needs (view source) Operational aspects of the system should be enhanced (view source) Pareto Frontier Techniques are useful for multi-criteria forest management planning (view source) Regular ongoing engagement helped maintain interest of users (view source) SIPAFIT can act sometimes as a referee to settle arguments among experts, users and stakeholders (view source) SIPAFIT sub-systems have been useful in training activities, and can be very useful to explain and (view source) Spatial variation between regions led to the development of different regional models, which led to (view source) Stakeholder involvement (view source) Stakeholder involvement in DSS design (view source) Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions (view source) The DSS gave the forest manager the opportunity to experiment how their emphasis towards certain (view source) The DSS usage enabled the planning team to measure the achievement of the restoration goals (view source) The ProgettoBosco working methodology, based on cooperation, successive approximations and (view source) The activation of an iterative process through periodical meetings permitted to all the stakeholders (view source) The adoption of the collaborative learning method made possible to gradually select the conceptual (view source) The analysis team used internal prototyping, which helped train the staff and identify possible (view source) The definition of standardized and specific criteria for selecting and zoning forest compartment (view source) The development of large and enduring systems requires a long term approach (view source) The fact that ProgettoBosco is conceived according to the criteria and indicators of sustainable (view source) The use of EMDS allowed the planning team to identify priority area for restoration treatments that (view source) The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more (view source) The use of the DSS improved communication among the planning team by providing a framework of the (view source) The very easy user-friendly interface of the software and the clearness of method can be exploited (view source) Threshold values and weights used in a decision process have strong effect on the results (view source) To compare the current and the past quantitative-qualitative parameters of the forest, great effort (view source) To meet the needs of customer - the Forest Service - and to obtain satisfying results the (view source) Use of adequate DSS development methodology (view source) Users preferred enhanced functionality rather than useability (view source) Visualization of the preliminary actor network made the people explicity include the DSS in a planning process (view source) More...