Difference between revisions of "3. Evaluating options"
From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
(Created page with "The tasks involved in this phase are 1. Selecting the best option * In continuous case (see Malczewski 1999), the best option can be selected using optimizations tools, and in ...") |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
1. Selecting the best option | 1. Selecting the best option | ||
| − | * In continuous case (see Malczewski 1999), the best option can be selected using optimizations tools, and in discrete case with multi-criteria analysis tools. | + | * In continuous case (see Malczewski 1999), the best option can be selected using optimizations tools, and in discrete case with multi-criteria analysis tools or voting methods. |
| − | 2. Ranking alternative options | + | 2. Ranking alternative options |
| − | 3. Aggregating preferences | + | * If it is not enough to select one best option, the options can be ranked from best to worst. There may also be groups of options that are indifferent to the DM/stakeholders. |
| + | 3. Aggregating preferences | ||
| + | * In case of several stakeholders / DMs the preferences need to be aggregated, in order to select the best option. | ||
Revision as of 18:21, 12 September 2011
The tasks involved in this phase are
1. Selecting the best option
- In continuous case (see Malczewski 1999), the best option can be selected using optimizations tools, and in discrete case with multi-criteria analysis tools or voting methods.
2. Ranking alternative options
- If it is not enough to select one best option, the options can be ranked from best to worst. There may also be groups of options that are indifferent to the DM/stakeholders.
3. Aggregating preferences
- In case of several stakeholders / DMs the preferences need to be aggregated, in order to select the best option.
