Difference between revisions of "Case Study Literature Methods"
From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) m |
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) m |
||
(One intermediate revision by one user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[category:Case Studies]] | [[category:Case Studies]] | ||
+ | This page is just for literature citations that provide methods/theory useful for our FORSYS case studies. We will create a separate page to enter our case studies. | ||
==Case studies methods== | ==Case studies methods== | ||
Line 20: | Line 21: | ||
==DSS Use== | ==DSS Use== | ||
+ | ; DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E.R. 2003. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems 19:9-22. | ||
+ | : A widely cited framework using more technical than social factors; base measures are: system quality, information quality, and service quality |
Latest revision as of 08:06, 17 November 2011
This page is just for literature citations that provide methods/theory useful for our FORSYS case studies. We will create a separate page to enter our case studies.
Case studies methods
- Yin, R.K. 2003. Case study research - design and methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
- Probably the most widely referenced methods text for case studies (at least in the USA).
- Stake, R.E. 1995. The art of case study research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif.
Case study research : principles and practices / John Gerring. Cambridge university press, 2007.
Case study methods / Jacques Hamel with Stéphane Dufour, Dominic Fortin. Newbury Park, Calif. [etc.] : Sage, 1993.
The case study anthology / editor Robert K. Yin. Thousand Oaks, Calif. [etc.] : Sage, 2004.
DSS Development
DSS Diffusion/Adoption
- Rogers, E.M. 2003. Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York.
- The most widely cited text on innovation diffusion.
DSS Use
- DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E.R. 2003. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success
- a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems 19:9-22.
- A widely cited framework using more technical than social factors; base measures are: system quality, information quality, and service quality