Difference between revisions of "Participatory planning case template"

From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: require(): Unable to allocate memory for pool. in /data/home/fp0804/www/wiki/includes/AutoLoader.php on line 1191
(Alternatives)
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== General case description ==  
 
== General case description ==  
 +
 +
[[Category:Cases of participatory planning in forestry]]
 +
[[category:Case Studies]]
  
 
=== Brief overview ===
 
=== Brief overview ===
 
Briefly define purpose & objectives of the case introduced
 
Briefly define purpose & objectives of the case introduced
* what was the problem
+
 
* what was the planning area
+
* what was the problem  
* what was the planning organization / who was the decision maker
+
* what was the end product
* what were the aims of the plan
+
* what was the planning area  
* what were the aims of the participation in the case
+
* what was the planning organization  
 +
* who was the decision maker  
 +
* what were the aims of the project
 +
* what were the aims of the participation process in the project (for example, conflict resolution, increasing acceptance of decisions)
 +
 
  
  
 
[[Category:Help documents]]
 
[[Category:Help documents]]
 +
  
 
__TOC__
 
__TOC__
  
 
== Organization  ==
 
== Organization  ==
* Who starts the process?
+
* Who started the process?  
* What is the role of participation in the decision process?
+
* What influence did the participation have in the decision process? (for instance compared to Arnstein levels of participation)
* How is the participation process organized?
+
* How is the participation process organized?
 +
* What was the time frame for participation?
 +
* What was the time frame related to the project time frame?
 +
* What was the budget of project/participation (for example in money, workdays etc.)?
 +
 
 +
===Problem structuring ===
 +
* How was the problem defined?
 +
* Who defined the problem? Was participation used in problem definition phase?
 +
* What tools or methods were used in problem structuring, if any?
  
 
== Intelligence ==
 
== Intelligence ==
Line 42: Line 58:
 
* How were they defined?
 
* How were they defined?
 
* Who defined them?
 
* Who defined them?
 +
* What tools and methods (if any) were used to define them?
  
=== DSS usage ===
+
== Choice ==
  
* How was the DSS (if any) used in the process?
+
=== Usage of DSS ===
 
+
* What kind of DSS was used (if any)?
== Choice ==
+
* How was the DSS used in the process?
  
=== Methods and tools used ===
+
=== Usage of models, methods and tools ===
* What kind of DSS was used (if any)
+
 
* What kind of decision support tools (models, methods) were used, if any?
 
* What kind of decision support tools (models, methods) were used, if any?
 +
* How were the decision support tools used? (for instance, through internet, with the help of a facilitator, with hands-on experiments)
 +
* Was the use of decision support tools interactive?
  
 
== Monitoring ==
 
== Monitoring ==
* Was the implementation of the plan monitored?
+
* Was the success of the project monitored?  
* was the success of the process monitored?
+
* How was the success of the project monitored? (both process and product)
* how was the success of the process monitored
+
* Who monitored the success?
 +
* Were the decisions/plans implemented?
 +
* Was the implementation monitored?
 +
* Were the goals set for participation achieved?
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Latest revision as of 16:49, 7 June 2013

General case description

Brief overview

Briefly define purpose & objectives of the case introduced

  • what was the problem
  • what was the end product
  • what was the planning area
  • what was the planning organization
  • who was the decision maker
  • what were the aims of the project
  • what were the aims of the participation process in the project (for example, conflict resolution, increasing acceptance of decisions)


Organization

  • Who started the process?
  • What influence did the participation have in the decision process? (for instance compared to Arnstein levels of participation)
  • How is the participation process organized?
  • What was the time frame for participation?
  • What was the time frame related to the project time frame?
  • What was the budget of project/participation (for example in money, workdays etc.)?

Problem structuring

  • How was the problem defined?
  • Who defined the problem? Was participation used in problem definition phase?
  • What tools or methods were used in problem structuring, if any?

Intelligence

Stakeholders

  • who were the stakeholders?
  • how were they selected?

Objectives

  • what were the criteria?
  • how were they selected?

Preferences

  • how were the preferences of the decision makers and stakeholders elicited?

Information

  • what information was collected?
  • what tools were used for data collection?

Design

Alternatives

  • What kind of alternatives were considered?
  • How were they defined?
  • Who defined them?
  • What tools and methods (if any) were used to define them?

Choice

Usage of DSS

  • What kind of DSS was used (if any)?
  • How was the DSS used in the process?

Usage of models, methods and tools

  • What kind of decision support tools (models, methods) were used, if any?
  • How were the decision support tools used? (for instance, through internet, with the help of a facilitator, with hands-on experiments)
  • Was the use of decision support tools interactive?

Monitoring

  • Was the success of the project monitored?
  • How was the success of the project monitored? (both process and product)
  • Who monitored the success?
  • Were the decisions/plans implemented?
  • Was the implementation monitored?
  • Were the goals set for participation achieved?

References

Cited references


External resources