Difference between revisions of "DSD"
m |
(There are still a few things missing) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== General System description == | == General System description == | ||
− | System name: Decision Support | + | System name: Decision Support Dobrova |
Acronym: DSD | Acronym: DSD | ||
=== Brief overview === | === Brief overview === | ||
− | + | DSD developed in order to support forest management in Karnten, southern Austria, [[:Category:Pinus sylvestris|Scots pine]] forests. It deals with new stands establishment and treatment scheduling problems. | |
− | |||
[[Category:Decision support system]] | [[Category:Decision support system]] | ||
[[Category:Austrian DSS]] | [[Category:Austrian DSS]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Government use]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Stand level]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Goal-driven DSS]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Species selection]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Forest transformation]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Pinus sylvestris]] | ||
+ | [[Image:DSD_screenshot.jpg|thumb|300px|DSD screenshot]] | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Scope of the system === | ||
+ | DSD supports two main silvicultural decision-making problems, both for individual stands: | ||
+ | # The establishment of new stands. It seeks which species or species mixtures are suitable at particular locations within the project area, including considerations of the effect of climate change. | ||
+ | # Stand treatments scheduling, given a particular set of management objectives aiming at a future species-mixture stand type. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === System origin === | ||
+ | * It was developed by a researchers team in the Universität für Bodenkultur Wien. First prototype was implemented in 2001. | ||
+ | * how was it developed | ||
+ | * is it a commercial product | ||
+ | * Is in use in southern Austria. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Support for specific issues === | ||
+ | Timber harvest effects, climate change effects, risk assesment methods, biodiversity, and site improvement. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Support for specific thematic areas of a problem type === | ||
+ | * Silvicultural | ||
+ | * Certification | ||
+ | * Conservation | ||
+ | * Restoration | ||
+ | * Development choices / land use zoning | ||
+ | * Policy/intervention alternatives | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Capability to support decision making phases === | ||
+ | ''(NOTE I do not quite know what to do with this, as I do not understand it myself, although it seems related to system use)'' | ||
+ | |||
+ | (Click [[Simon's decision making model|here]] to see a more detailed explanation) | ||
+ | * Intelligence (+ explicit description of the support given by the DSS) | ||
+ | * Design (+ explicit description of the support given by the DSS) | ||
+ | * Choice (+ explicit description of the support given by the DSS) | ||
+ | * Monitor (+ explicit description of the support given by the DSS) | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Related systems === | ||
+ | * [[SDSS Wolschartwald]] | ||
+ | * [[SDSS Wildalpen]] | ||
+ | * [[CONES]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Data and data models == | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Typical spatial extent of application === | ||
+ | Stand level. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Forest data input === | ||
+ | Stand characteristics are input via GUI. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Type of information input from user (via GUI) === | ||
+ | Users have to assign a particular forest property to one of the predefined site and stand categories, usin some easily available stand characteristics. They also have to choose the management objectives among the predefined ones employing pairwise comparisons. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Models == | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Forest models === | ||
+ | Growth and yield models are used to calculate costs and revenues. It has also an additive hierarchical utility model used in the multicriteria evaluation. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Decision Support == | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Definition of management interventions === | ||
+ | Manager is able to choose among three objectives: timber production, nature conservation and biodiversity, or mantaining or improving site productivity. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Typical temporal scale of application === | ||
+ | Depending on the objective, a short- to mid-term (i.e., 30 years) as well as a long-term planning horizon is distinguished. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Types of decisions supported === | ||
+ | *Management level | ||
+ | **strategic decisions | ||
+ | **administrative decisions | ||
+ | **operating control decisions | ||
+ | * Management function | ||
+ | * planning decisions | ||
+ | **organizing decisions | ||
+ | **command decisions | ||
+ | **control decisions | ||
+ | ** coordination decisions | ||
+ | *decision making situation | ||
+ | **unilateral | ||
+ | ** collegial | ||
+ | **Bargaining / participative decision making | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Decision-making processes and models === | ||
+ | *Simulation (with and without stochasticity) | ||
+ | *Multiple criteria/ranking | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Output == | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Types of outputs === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Results can be viewed on the screen, stored in the database of DSD, and be printed in a comprehensive report. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == System == | ||
+ | |||
+ | === System requirements === | ||
+ | * Operating Systems: (Windows, Macintosh, Linux/UNIX, Web-based, Others) | ||
+ | * Other software needed (GIS, MIP packages, etc...) | ||
+ | * Development status | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Architecture and major DSS components === | ||
+ | DSD was implemented in Borland(R) C++TM as a client/server architecture, with Oracle(R) as the relational database system. Thus, the inteface component of the program resides on the desktop computer of the user, and the application logic is on the central server of the forest region authorities. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The GUI is completely based on Borland's VCL (Visual C Library), and the generation of reports is based on QuickreportTM, which uses components of the Borland(R) C++TM programming environment. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Usage === | ||
+ | DSD has been developed to support the staff of forestry extension services in the Dobrova region in preparing informed recommendations for forest management to small private landowners based on the owner's goal preferences. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Documentation and support === | ||
+ | Describe the connection to Help-system and possibilities for assistance, as well as the required training and user support levels | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Installation === | ||
+ | * Prerequisite knowledge: Level of effort to become functional | ||
+ | * Cost: (purchase price, development costs, demonstrated return on investment, cost of use, training costs, licence and maintenance costs) | ||
+ | * Demo: allows the download/utilization of a trial version. If yes, where is it available and what are the trial conditions. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==References== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===External resources=== | ||
+ | * http://www.wabo.boku.ac.at/dsd.html | ||
+ | * REYNOLDS K.M., TWERY M., LEXER M.J., VACIK H., RAY D., SHAO G,. et BORGES J.G.: ''Decision Support Systems in Forest Management'' IN BURSTEIN F. et HOLSAPPLE C. W. (EDS.) (2008): ''Handbook on Decision Support Systems 2: Variations''. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 800 pp. |
Revision as of 00:59, 14 September 2009
General System description
System name: Decision Support Dobrova
Acronym: DSD
Brief overview
DSD developed in order to support forest management in Karnten, southern Austria, Scots pine forests. It deals with new stands establishment and treatment scheduling problems.Contents
Scope of the system
DSD supports two main silvicultural decision-making problems, both for individual stands:
- The establishment of new stands. It seeks which species or species mixtures are suitable at particular locations within the project area, including considerations of the effect of climate change.
- Stand treatments scheduling, given a particular set of management objectives aiming at a future species-mixture stand type.
System origin
- It was developed by a researchers team in the Universität für Bodenkultur Wien. First prototype was implemented in 2001.
- how was it developed
- is it a commercial product
- Is in use in southern Austria.
Support for specific issues
Timber harvest effects, climate change effects, risk assesment methods, biodiversity, and site improvement.
Support for specific thematic areas of a problem type
- Silvicultural
- Certification
- Conservation
- Restoration
- Development choices / land use zoning
- Policy/intervention alternatives
Capability to support decision making phases
(NOTE I do not quite know what to do with this, as I do not understand it myself, although it seems related to system use)
(Click here to see a more detailed explanation)
- Intelligence (+ explicit description of the support given by the DSS)
- Design (+ explicit description of the support given by the DSS)
- Choice (+ explicit description of the support given by the DSS)
- Monitor (+ explicit description of the support given by the DSS)
Related systems
Data and data models
Typical spatial extent of application
Stand level.
Forest data input
Stand characteristics are input via GUI.
Type of information input from user (via GUI)
Users have to assign a particular forest property to one of the predefined site and stand categories, usin some easily available stand characteristics. They also have to choose the management objectives among the predefined ones employing pairwise comparisons.
Models
Forest models
Growth and yield models are used to calculate costs and revenues. It has also an additive hierarchical utility model used in the multicriteria evaluation.
Decision Support
Definition of management interventions
Manager is able to choose among three objectives: timber production, nature conservation and biodiversity, or mantaining or improving site productivity.
Typical temporal scale of application
Depending on the objective, a short- to mid-term (i.e., 30 years) as well as a long-term planning horizon is distinguished.
Types of decisions supported
- Management level
- strategic decisions
- administrative decisions
- operating control decisions
- Management function
- planning decisions
- organizing decisions
- command decisions
- control decisions
- coordination decisions
- decision making situation
- unilateral
- collegial
- Bargaining / participative decision making
Decision-making processes and models
- Simulation (with and without stochasticity)
- Multiple criteria/ranking
Output
Types of outputs
Results can be viewed on the screen, stored in the database of DSD, and be printed in a comprehensive report.
System
System requirements
- Operating Systems: (Windows, Macintosh, Linux/UNIX, Web-based, Others)
- Other software needed (GIS, MIP packages, etc...)
- Development status
Architecture and major DSS components
DSD was implemented in Borland(R) C++TM as a client/server architecture, with Oracle(R) as the relational database system. Thus, the inteface component of the program resides on the desktop computer of the user, and the application logic is on the central server of the forest region authorities.
The GUI is completely based on Borland's VCL (Visual C Library), and the generation of reports is based on QuickreportTM, which uses components of the Borland(R) C++TM programming environment.
Usage
DSD has been developed to support the staff of forestry extension services in the Dobrova region in preparing informed recommendations for forest management to small private landowners based on the owner's goal preferences.
Documentation and support
Describe the connection to Help-system and possibilities for assistance, as well as the required training and user support levels
Installation
- Prerequisite knowledge: Level of effort to become functional
- Cost: (purchase price, development costs, demonstrated return on investment, cost of use, training costs, licence and maintenance costs)
- Demo: allows the download/utilization of a trial version. If yes, where is it available and what are the trial conditions.
References
External resources
- http://www.wabo.boku.ac.at/dsd.html
- REYNOLDS K.M., TWERY M., LEXER M.J., VACIK H., RAY D., SHAO G,. et BORGES J.G.: Decision Support Systems in Forest Management IN BURSTEIN F. et HOLSAPPLE C. W. (EDS.) (2008): Handbook on Decision Support Systems 2: Variations. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 800 pp.