Difference between revisions of "Participatory planning case template"
From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
(→Alternatives) |
(→DSS usage) |
||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
* How were they defined? | * How were they defined? | ||
* Who defined them? | * Who defined them? | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
== Choice == | == Choice == | ||
Revision as of 15:11, 8 September 2009
General case description
Brief overview
Briefly define purpose & objectives of the case introduced
- what was the problem
- what was the planning area
- what was the planning organization / who was the decision maker
- what were the aims of the plan
- what were the aims of the participation in the case
Contents
Organization
- Who starts the process?
- What is the role of participation in the decision process?
- How is the participation process organized?
Intelligence
Stakeholders
- who were the stakeholders?
- how were they selected?
Objectives
- what were the criteria?
- how were they selected?
Preferences
- how were the preferences of the decision makers and stakeholders elicited?
Information
- what information was collected?
- what tools were used for data collection?
Design
Alternatives
- What kind of alternatives were considered?
- How were they defined?
- Who defined them?
Choice
Methods and tools used
- What kind of DSS was used (if any)
- What kind of decision support tools (models, methods) were used, if any?
Monitoring
- Was the implementation of the plan monitored?
- was the success of the process monitored?
- how was the success of the process monitored
References
Cited references
