Difference between revisions of "Interpretative case studies can help reduce the gap between research and practice"
From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) (Seans automated transfer) |
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) (Forsys_add_wg_subthemes.py) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Lesson | {{Lesson | ||
| + | |ID=78 | ||
|Has statement=Interpretative case studies can help reduce the gap between research and practice | |Has statement=Interpretative case studies can help reduce the gap between research and practice | ||
|Has evidence=During the process links have been created between researchers and senior professionals. | |Has evidence=During the process links have been created between researchers and senior professionals. | ||
|Has consequences=The case study can provide useful guidelines for contemporary practice. | |Has consequences=The case study can provide useful guidelines for contemporary practice. | ||
|Has recommendation for action=Develop interpretative case studies during the different stages of the process (e.g. design, adoption, use). | |Has recommendation for action=Develop interpretative case studies during the different stages of the process (e.g. design, adoption, use). | ||
| − | |||
|Has temporal scale=Long term (strategic) | |Has temporal scale=Long term (strategic) | ||
|Has spatial context=Spatial with neighbourhood interrelations | |Has spatial context=Spatial with neighbourhood interrelations | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|Has decision making dimension=More than one decision maker/stakeholder | |Has decision making dimension=More than one decision maker/stakeholder | ||
|Has country=Germany | |Has country=Germany | ||
| − | |||
|Has reference=See case | |Has reference=See case | ||
| − | |Has related case=Germany | + | |Has related case=Germany-Actor Network Theory to Understand Collaborative Decision Support Systems Development in Forest Management Practice |
| + | |Has other relevant information=See case | ||
| + | |Has working group theme=Knowledge management, Participation | ||
|Has actor perspective=Developer/Architect, Researcher | |Has actor perspective=Developer/Architect, Researcher | ||
| − | |Has | + | |Has DSS development stage=Update |
}} | }} | ||
| + | [[Wg3::Transfer]] [[Wg3::Evaluation]] | ||
Latest revision as of 03:36, 9 September 2013
Lesson
| ID | 78 |
|---|---|
| Has statement | Interpretative case studies can help reduce the gap between research and practice |
| Has evidence | During the process links have been created between researchers and senior professionals. |
| Has consequences | The case study can provide useful guidelines for contemporary practice. |
| Has recommendation for action | Develop interpretative case studies during the different stages of the process (e.g. design, adoption, use). |
| Has domain | |
| Has DSS development stage | Update |
| Has decision stage | |
| Has temporal scale | Long term (strategic) |
| Has spatial context | Spatial with neighbourhood interrelations |
| Has spatial scale | Forest level, Regional/national level |
| Has objectives dimension | Multiple objectives |
| Has goods and services dimension | Market services, Non-market services |
| Has decision making dimension | More than one decision maker/stakeholder |
| Has country | Germany |
| Has reference | See case |
| Has related DSS | |
| Has related case | Germany-Actor Network Theory to Understand Collaborative Decision Support Systems Development in Forest Management Practice |
| Has related lesson | |
| Has other relevant information | See case |
| Has working group theme | Knowledge management, Participation |
| Has DSS development | |
| Has decision support techniques | |
| Has knowledge management processes | |
| Has support for social participation | |
| Has actor perspective | Developer/Architect, Researcher |
| Has researcher role | |
| Has user role | |
| Has developer role |
