Difference between revisions of "Umea 2013 Wiki WorkshopA"
(→Category) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
===Category=== | ===Category=== | ||
> Classification of wiki pages | > Classification of wiki pages | ||
| + | |||
> Markup: <nowiki>[[Category:category name]]</nowiki> | > Markup: <nowiki>[[Category:category name]]</nowiki> | ||
| + | |||
> Example: <nowiki>[[Category:DSS]]</nowiki> ... means: the wiki page belongs to the category DSS | > Example: <nowiki>[[Category:DSS]]</nowiki> ... means: the wiki page belongs to the category DSS | ||
Revision as of 09:59, 25 April 2013
Contents
Exercise: produce your own question for the Umea FAQ
- Discover the wiki content
- DSS descriptions, Case Studies and Lessons Learned documentation
- Check for the properties likely to be useful for querying
- Formulate your question > see examples below
- Create a wiki page about your question > see the following example Question: Which DSSs were developed by large team of people
- Produce the semantic query > semantic search
- Copy the query in your wiki page
- Add some explanations / comments (why this query, for whom is it relevant, what about the results, why relevant?) > see the wiki markups: [| more detailed help]
Semantic wiki basic concepts
Category
> Classification of wiki pages
> Markup: [[Category:category name]]
> Example: [[Category:DSS]] ... means: the wiki page belongs to the category DSS
Protperty
> Formalisation of some specific aspects of the content of a wiki page (basically single words or combinations thereof) > Markup: [[property name::value]] > Example: [[has country::Sweden]] ... means: the wiki page is characterised by the fact that it is related to Sweden
Some examples of questions
Which DSSs were developed by a team of at least 5 people?
Query: [[Category:DSS]][[Has DSS development.Has development team size::>5]]
Results: CONES, EFIMOD, EMDS, ETÇAP, EcologicalSiteClassification, LEaRNForME, PYL, ProgettoBosco, SIPAFIT, TestDSS, ToSIA
Embed code {{#ask:[[Category:DSS]][[Has DSS development.Has development team size::>5]] |format=list |limit=20 |offset=0 }}
Which DSSs support the process of evaluating options?
Query: [[Category:DSS]][[Has support for social participation.Has participatory planning task::Evaluating options]]
Results: CONES, ClimChAlp, DSD, EFIMOD, EMDS, FORFUN, Heureka, MyTestDSS, PEB, PLANFLOR, PYL, SiWaWa, WIS.2
Which DSSs support the process of evaluating options at forest and strategic level?
Query: [[Category:DSS]][[Has support for social participation.Has participatory planning task::Evaluating options]][[Has temporal scale::Long term (strategic)]][[Has spatial scale::Forest level]]
Results: EFIMOD, EMDS, Heureka, PEB, PLANFLOR, WIS.2
List of questions elaborated during the workshop
Overview on the dedicated category page Category:Umea 2013 Question
Query: [[Category:Umea 2013 Question]]
Results: DSS for ecosystem services, Question: DSS Commercial Product, Question: DSS with forest indicators, Question: For which kind of use cases DSS are used for, Question: Question: Which DSSs use Stochastic programming, Question: Which DSS has strategic temporal scale, Question: Which DSSs have spatial context, Question: Which DSSs have technical documentation, Question: Which DSSs support multiple objectives, Question: Which DSSs support the process of evaluating options, Question: Which DSSs were developed by Sweden, Question: Which DSSs were developed by large team of people, Question: Which DSSs were developed in Italy, Question: Which LessonsLearned has spatial scale of stand level, Question: Which cases are currently active, Which kinds of DSS focus on landscape quality, Which lessons are about knowledge management
