Deletion log
From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
Below is a list of the most recent deletions.
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)- 19:36, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page Use of the DSS has been considered successful by the participating organizations, even though it has (Seans automated delete)
- 19:36, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page An iterative process of presenting results to subject matter experts enabled them to better (Seans automated delete)
- 19:36, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page The DSS models built must match the knowledge of the local forest managers, so the ability for local (Seans automated delete)
- 19:36, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page Running the DSS required special skills, therefore the local planning team required considerable (Seans automated delete)
- 19:36, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page Enabling the analyses of several ecosystem services (timber and non-timber resources) in one and the (Seans automated delete)
- 19:36, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page Enlarged decision space (Seans automated delete)
- 19:36, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page Group participation with knowledgeable people is a good way to ensure that the decision hierarchy is (Seans automated delete)
- 19:31, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page BrazilianCR3 (Seans automated delete)
- 19:30, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page BrazilianCR2 (Seans automated delete)
- 19:54, 1 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page BrazilianCR1 (content was: "{{Lesson |Has statement=Contribution given by graduate Forestry programs are significant for the development and modernization of DSS forest management tools and for the management of large scale industrial forest plantations |Has justif...")
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page Regular ongoing engagement helped maintain interest of users (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page Metodology and results are transparent and easy-to-share to non-expert stakeholders (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page Requirement of specialized skills can discourage some potential users (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page DSS can help in varying the treatment according to more than one forest function (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page Users preferred enhanced functionality rather than useability (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page TestCaseLesson3 (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page A financial analysis is an important component in the discussion about the preferences of different (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page It should be possible to specify the rotation time of a species not only by age but also by target (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page Decision criteria beyond the state of the ecosystem (for example, social values fire risk, economic (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page To meet the needs of customer - the Forest Service - and to obtain satisfying results the (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page Analysis at the landscape level allowed the integration of concerns about multiple resources as well (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page The DSS gave the forest manager the opportunity to experiment how their emphasis towards certain (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page SIPAFIT sub-systems have been useful in training activities, and can be very useful to explain and (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page SIPAFIT can act sometimes as a “referee” to settle arguments among experts, users and stakeholders (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page Lack of proper documentation and support services (manual, website, etc) can severely limit the (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page To compare the current and the past quantitative/qualitative parameters of the forest, great effort (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page Embedding a DSS in a GIS software allows obtaining information at different spatial scales using the (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page Use of adequate DSS development methodology (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page The definition of standardized and specific criteria for selecting and zoning forest compartment (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page The ProgettoBosco working methodology, based on cooperation, successive approximations and (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page The activation of an iterative process through periodical meetings permitted to all the stakeholders (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page The adoption of the collaborative learning method made possible to gradually select the conceptual (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page The very easy user-friendly interface of the software and the clearness of method can be exploited (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page The fact that ProgettoBosco is conceived according to the criteria and indicators of sustainable (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page Forest managers have to analyze how their forest management interventions effect the landscape (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page The use of the DSS improved communication among the planning team by providing a framework of the (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page Multiple DSS are often needed to meet complex needs (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page The kinds of DSS traditionally used to calculate timber harvest levels are now being used to model (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page Using FORFUN DSS allowed to explain better some technical concepts, like the difference between (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page The scope of the modeling project can change significantly during the project (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page The use of a DSS can help in varying the treatment according to more than one forest function (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page Involving local stakeholders in ranking the functions allowed to show them tangibly how their (Seans automated delete)
- 07:41, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page The DSS usage enabled the planning team to measure the achievement of the restoration goals (Seans automated delete)
- 07:40, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page DSS helped document and apply decision criteria consistently, and therefore produced a more (Seans automated delete)
- 07:40, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page The use of EMDS allowed the planning team to identify priority area for restoration treatments that (Seans automated delete)
- 07:40, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page Adapting the software to make it possible to easily include also the output of other mechanistic (Seans automated delete)
- 07:40, 30 April 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page Spatial variation between regions led to the development of different regional models, which led to (Seans automated delete)
