All public logs
From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
Combined display of all available logs of COST Action FP0804: FORSYS. You can narrow down the view by selecting a log type, the username (case-sensitive), or the affected page (also case-sensitive).
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)- 19:32, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9710 of page The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more patrolled
- 19:32, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9709 of page To meet the needs of customer - the Forest Service - and to obtain satisfying results the patrolled
- 19:31, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9708 of page SIPAFIT can act sometimes as a referee to settle arguments among experts, users and stakeholders patrolled
- 19:31, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9707 of page To compare the current and the past quantitative/qualitative parameters of the forest, great effort patrolled
- 19:31, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9706 of page It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development patrolled
- 19:31, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9705 of page SIPAFIT sub-systems have been useful in training activities, and can be very useful to explain and patrolled
- 19:31, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9704 of page A financial analysis is an important component in the discussion about the preferences of different patrolled
- 19:31, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9703 of page It should be possible to specify the rotation time of a species not only by age but also by target patrolled
- 19:31, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9702 of page An optimisation module comparing alternative scenarios based on multi-criteria analysis should be patrolled
- 19:31, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9701 of page Lack of proper documentation and support services (manual, website, etc) can severely limit the patrolled
- 19:31, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9700 of page The activation of an iterative process through periodical meetings permitted to all the stakeholders patrolled
- 19:31, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9699 of page The adoption of the collaborative learning method made possible to gradually select the conceptual patrolled
- 19:31, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9698 of page The ProgettoBosco working methodology, based on cooperation, successive approximations and patrolled
- 19:31, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9697 of page The definition of standardized and specific criteria for selecting and zoning forest compartment patrolled
- 19:31, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9696 of page The fact that ProgettoBosco is conceived according to the criteria and indicators of sustainable patrolled
- 19:31, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9695 of page The very easy user-friendly interface of the software and the clearness of method can be exploited patrolled
- 19:31, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9694 of page Stakeholder involvement in DSS design patrolled
- 19:31, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9693 of page Adapting the software to make it possible to easily include also the output of other mechanistic patrolled
- 19:31, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9692 of page Operational aspects of the system should be enhanced patrolled
- 19:31, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9691 of page Enlarge the decision space by generating a large set of potential management alternatives patrolled
- 19:31, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9690 of page Growth and Yield models are a key component of forest DSS patrolled
- 19:31, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9689 of page Pareto Frontier Techniques are useful for multi-criteria forest management planning patrolled
- 19:31, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9688 of page Forest managers have to analyze how their forest management interventions effect the landscape patrolled
- 19:31, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9687 of page The use of the DSS improved communication among the planning team by providing a framework of the patrolled
- 19:31, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9686 of page Multiple DSS are often needed to meet complex needs patrolled
- 19:31, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9685 of page Analysis at the landscape level allowed the integration of concerns about multiple resources as well patrolled
- 19:31, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9684 of page The DSS gave the forest manager the opportunity to experiment how their emphasis towards certain patrolled
- 19:31, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9683 of page The DSS usage enabled the planning team to measure the achievement of the restoration goals patrolled
- 19:31, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9682 of page The use of EMDS allowed the planning team to identify priority area for restoration treatments that patrolled
- 19:31, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9681 of page Decision criteria beyond the state of the ecosystem (for example, social values fire risk, economic patrolled
- 19:31, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9680 of page Modular approach helpful in assisting industry uptake patrolled
- 19:30, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9679 of page DSS allowed to explain better some technical concepts to non-professional stakeholders patrolled
- 19:30, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9678 of page Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions patrolled
- 19:30, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9677 of page DSS can help in varying the treatment according to more than one forest function patrolled
- 19:30, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9676 of page Users preferred enhanced functionality rather than useability patrolled
- 19:30, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9675 of page Regular ongoing engagement helped maintain interest of users patrolled
- 19:28, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 9674 of page The development of large and enduring systems requires a long term approach patrolled
- 18:36, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page Actor Network Theory provides a suitable lens for exploring both technical and human aspects of DSS institutionalization in the forestry domain (Seans automated delete)
- 18:36, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page Interpretative case studies can help reduce the gap between research and practice (Seans automated delete)
- 18:36, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page Need of flexibilization of analytical tools - no "overdesigned" tool that provides too much features for the use (Seans automated delete)
- 18:36, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page Need of a moderator function (Seans automated delete)
- 18:36, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page The tracing of the actor network supported the identification of the key actors influencing the collaborative DSS implementation and institutionalization (Seans automated delete)
- 18:36, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page The analysis of the actor network interactions allowed to identify the criticalities to be solved in order to develop the collaborative process (Seans automated delete)
- 18:36, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page Need for new models for the later use of a tool (Seans automated delete)
- 18:36, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page The tracing of the current actor network interactions made the group realize that they need a different kind of stakeholders from what they previously thought (Seans automated delete)
- 18:36, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page Biomasfor allows to obtain information at different spatial scale (Seans automated delete)
- 18:36, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page Using Actor Network Theory in the design stage can help in understanding the dynamism of the network (Seans automated delete)
- 18:36, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page Stakeholder involvement in DSS design (Seans automated delete)
- 18:36, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page Modular approach helpful in assisting industry uptake (Seans automated delete)
- 18:36, 2 May 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page DSS allowed to explain better some technical concepts to non-professional stakeholders (Seans automated delete)
