All public logs
From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
Combined display of all available logs of COST Action FP0804: FORSYS. You can narrow down the view by selecting a log type, the username (case-sensitive), or the affected page (also case-sensitive).
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)- 17:32, 31 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10169 of page ATestCase patrolled
- 17:30, 31 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10168 of page ATestCase patrolled
- 04:00, 31 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10167 of page The fact that ProgettoBosco is conceived according to the criteria and indicators of sustainable patrolled
- 03:58, 31 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page System testing (moved to Has DSS development stage)
- 03:57, 31 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10166 of page The analysis team used internal prototyping, which helped train the staff and identify possible patrolled
- 03:56, 31 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10165 of page Students studying forest management planning procedures and processes were very useful ‘guinea pigs’ patrolled
- 03:54, 31 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page Ongoing development (moved to Has DSS development stage)
- 03:53, 31 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) deleted page Application of the DSS (moved to Has DSS development stage)
- 03:05, 31 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10164 of page The ProgettoBosco working methodology, based on cooperation, successive approximations and patrolled
- 03:00, 31 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) moved page Stakeholder involvement in the development and use of DSS to Participation (simplified property value)
- 02:56, 31 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10160 of page Users preferred enhanced functionality rather than useability patrolled
- 02:56, 31 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10161 of page Using Actor Network Theory in the design stage can help in understanding the dynamism of the network patrolled
- 02:56, 31 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10159 of page The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more patrolled
- 02:56, 31 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10155 of page The DSS gave the forest manager the opportunity to experiment how their emphasis towards certain patrolled
- 02:56, 31 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10156 of page The DSS models built must match the knowledge of the local forest managers, so the ability for local patrolled
- 02:56, 31 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10157 of page The activation of an iterative process through periodical meetings permitted to all the stakeholders patrolled
- 02:56, 31 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10158 of page The adoption of the collaborative learning method made possible to gradually select the conceptual patrolled
- 02:56, 31 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10154 of page Students studying forest management planning procedures and processes were very useful ‘guinea pigs’ patrolled
- 02:56, 31 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10150 of page Regular ongoing engagement helped maintain interest of users patrolled
- 02:56, 31 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10151 of page SIPAFIT can act sometimes as a referee to settle arguments among experts, users and stakeholders patrolled
- 02:56, 31 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10152 of page Spatial variation between regions led to the development of different regional models, which led to patrolled
- 02:56, 31 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10153 of page Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions patrolled
- 02:56, 31 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10149 of page Need of a moderator function patrolled
- 02:56, 31 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10146 of page Getting joint funding from both the forest and environmental sectors can be a successfull for patrolled
- 02:56, 31 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10147 of page It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development patrolled
- 02:56, 31 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10148 of page Metodology and results are transparent and easy-to-share to non-expert stakeholders patrolled
- 02:56, 31 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10145 of page Enlarged decision space patrolled
- 02:55, 31 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10141 of page DSS allowed to explain better some technical concepts to non-professional stakeholders patrolled
- 02:55, 31 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10142 of page DSS can help in varying the treatment according to more than one forest function patrolled
- 02:55, 31 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10143 of page DSS helped document and apply decision criteria consistently, and therefore produced a more patrolled
- 02:55, 31 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10144 of page Enlarge the decision space by generating a large set of potential management alternatives patrolled
- 02:55, 31 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10140 of page An iterative process of presenting results to subject matter experts enabled them to better patrolled
- 16:27, 30 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10139 of page Visualization of the preliminary actor network made the people explicity include the DSS in a planning process. patrolled
- 16:27, 30 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10138 of page The tracing of the current actor network interactions made the group realize that they need a different kind of stakeholders from what they previously thought patrolled
- 16:27, 30 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10137 of page The tracing of the actor network supported the identification of the key actors influencing the collaborative DSS implementation and institutionalization patrolled
- 16:27, 30 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10136 of page The development of large and enduring systems requires a long term approach patrolled
- 16:27, 30 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10135 of page The choice to develop the system in an Excel environment was based on the status of computer patrolled
- 16:27, 30 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10134 of page The analysis of the actor network interactions allowed to identify the criticalities to be solved in order to develop the collaborative process patrolled
- 16:27, 30 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10133 of page The adoption of the collaborative learning method made possible to gradually select the conceptual patrolled
- 16:26, 30 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10132 of page Interpretative case studies can help reduce the gap between research and practice patrolled
- 16:25, 30 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10131 of page Actor Network Theory provides a suitable lens for exploring both technical and human aspects of DSS institutionalization in the forestry domain patrolled
- 07:06, 30 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10130 of page Visualization of the preliminary actor network made the people explicity include the DSS in a planning process. patrolled
- 07:06, 30 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10129 of page The tracing of the current actor network interactions made the group realize that they need a different kind of stakeholders from what they previously thought patrolled
- 07:06, 30 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10128 of page The tracing of the actor network supported the identification of the key actors influencing the collaborative DSS implementation and institutionalization patrolled
- 07:06, 30 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10127 of page The development of large and enduring systems requires a long term approach patrolled
- 07:06, 30 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10126 of page The choice to develop the system in an Excel environment was based on the status of computer patrolled
- 07:06, 30 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10125 of page The analysis of the actor network interactions allowed to identify the criticalities to be solved in order to develop the collaborative process patrolled
- 07:06, 30 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10124 of page The adoption of the collaborative learning method made possible to gradually select the conceptual patrolled
- 07:06, 30 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10123 of page Interpretative case studies can help reduce the gap between research and practice patrolled
- 07:06, 30 July 2013 SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) automatically marked revision 10122 of page Actor Network Theory provides a suitable lens for exploring both technical and human aspects of DSS institutionalization in the forestry domain patrolled
