Pages with the most revisions

From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
Jump to: navigation, search

Showing below up to 50 results starting with #351.

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

  1. China.106‏‎ (4 revisions)
  2. South Africa.78‏‎ (4 revisions)
  3. Wiki Semantic structure - DSS descriptions Workplan2013‏‎ (4 revisions)
  4. United States.1‏‎ (4 revisions)
  5. Chile.39‏‎ (4 revisions)
  6. Operational aspects of the system should be enhanced‏‎ (4 revisions)
  7. Analysis at the landscape level allowed the integration of concerns about multiple resources as well‏‎ (4 revisions)
  8. Spain-An agro-ecological Decision Support Systems for evaluting soil under scenarios of global change‏‎ (4 revisions)
  9. Austria.19‏‎ (4 revisions)
  10. Russia.20‏‎ (4 revisions)
  11. Switzerland.58‏‎ (4 revisions)
  12. Slovenia.45‏‎ (4 revisions)
  13. Portugal.29‏‎ (4 revisions)
  14. Portugal.93‏‎ (4 revisions)
  15. Sweden.93‏‎ (4 revisions)
  16. Ireland.47‏‎ (4 revisions)
  17. Italy-ProgettoBosco a data-driven DSS for forest planning: an application in Abruzzo Region‏‎ (4 revisions)
  18. Question 1: Which DSSs can support the KM processes?‏‎ (4 revisions)
  19. Running the DSS required special skills, therefore the local planning team required considerable‏‎ (4 revisions)
  20. Belgium-BoLa a specific sDSS to support land use planning in Flanders‏‎ (4 revisions)
  21. Hungary.15‏‎ (4 revisions)
  22. Hungary.66‏‎ (4 revisions)
  23. Finland.7‏‎ (4 revisions)
  24. Canada.31‏‎ (4 revisions)
  25. Germany.120‏‎ (4 revisions)
  26. South Africa.123‏‎ (4 revisions)
  27. Decision criteria beyond the state of the ecosystem (for example, social values fire risk, economic‏‎ (4 revisions)
  28. The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be‏‎ (4 revisions)
  29. United States.33‏‎ (4 revisions)
  30. Projection of stand development increases knowledge base‏‎ (4 revisions)
  31. Switzerland.9‏‎ (4 revisions)
  32. SØK.Decision support techniques‏‎ (4 revisions)
  33. TerEval.Decision support techniques‏‎ (4 revisions)
  34. Italy.1‏‎ (4 revisions)
  35. Austria-Improving forestry extension services for small-scale private landowners‏‎ (4 revisions)
  36. Portugal.36‏‎ (4 revisions)
  37. ToSIA.Software‏‎ (4 revisions)
  38. Brazil.44‏‎ (4 revisions)
  39. United Kingdom.103‏‎ (4 revisions)
  40. Netherlands.132‏‎ (4 revisions)
  41. Ireland.81‏‎ (4 revisions)
  42. RPF.Decision support techniques‏‎ (4 revisions)
  43. Spain.62‏‎ (4 revisions)
  44. Hungary.2‏‎ (4 revisions)
  45. Despite the widely use and acceptance of the DSS there was still a lack of expertise to‏‎ (4 revisions)
  46. Hungary.89‏‎ (4 revisions)
  47. New Zealand-Modular Forest Management DSS in NZ‏‎ (4 revisions)
  48. Germany.5‏‎ (4 revisions)
  49. South Africa.19‏‎ (4 revisions)
  50. Requirement of specialized skills can discourage some potential users‏‎ (4 revisions)

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)