Pages with the most revisions

From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
Jump to: navigation, search

Showing below up to 50 results starting with #351.

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

  1. Italy-Assessing forest functions at stand scale in a sub-regional forest plan in the Dolomites‏‎ (4 revisions)
  2. China.106‏‎ (4 revisions)
  3. Wiki Semantic structure - DSS descriptions Workplan2013‏‎ (4 revisions)
  4. Spain-An agro-ecological Decision Support Systems for evaluting soil under scenarios of global change‏‎ (4 revisions)
  5. Russia.20‏‎ (4 revisions)
  6. Chile.39‏‎ (4 revisions)
  7. Operational aspects of the system should be enhanced‏‎ (4 revisions)
  8. United States.1‏‎ (4 revisions)
  9. Switzerland.58‏‎ (4 revisions)
  10. Analysis at the landscape level allowed the integration of concerns about multiple resources as well‏‎ (4 revisions)
  11. Austria.19‏‎ (4 revisions)
  12. Portugal.93‏‎ (4 revisions)
  13. Sweden.93‏‎ (4 revisions)
  14. Slovenia.45‏‎ (4 revisions)
  15. Portugal.29‏‎ (4 revisions)
  16. Hungary.15‏‎ (4 revisions)
  17. Question 1: Which DSSs can support the KM processes?‏‎ (4 revisions)
  18. Hungary.66‏‎ (4 revisions)
  19. Canada.31‏‎ (4 revisions)
  20. Finland.7‏‎ (4 revisions)
  21. Running the DSS required special skills, therefore the local planning team required considerable‏‎ (4 revisions)
  22. Ireland.47‏‎ (4 revisions)
  23. Italy-ProgettoBosco a data-driven DSS for forest planning: an application in Abruzzo Region‏‎ (4 revisions)
  24. Belgium-BoLa a specific sDSS to support land use planning in Flanders‏‎ (4 revisions)
  25. South Africa.123‏‎ (4 revisions)
  26. The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be‏‎ (4 revisions)
  27. Germany.120‏‎ (4 revisions)
  28. Decision criteria beyond the state of the ecosystem (for example, social values fire risk, economic‏‎ (4 revisions)
  29. Projection of stand development increases knowledge base‏‎ (4 revisions)
  30. United States.33‏‎ (4 revisions)
  31. Switzerland.9‏‎ (4 revisions)
  32. Portugal.36‏‎ (4 revisions)
  33. Brazil.44‏‎ (4 revisions)
  34. Netherlands.132‏‎ (4 revisions)
  35. ToSIA.Software‏‎ (4 revisions)
  36. United Kingdom.103‏‎ (4 revisions)
  37. Italy.1‏‎ (4 revisions)
  38. SØK.Decision support techniques‏‎ (4 revisions)
  39. Austria-Improving forestry extension services for small-scale private landowners‏‎ (4 revisions)
  40. TerEval.Decision support techniques‏‎ (4 revisions)
  41. Despite the widely use and acceptance of the DSS there was still a lack of expertise to‏‎ (4 revisions)
  42. Hungary.2‏‎ (4 revisions)
  43. RPF.Decision support techniques‏‎ (4 revisions)
  44. Hungary.89‏‎ (4 revisions)
  45. New Zealand-Modular Forest Management DSS in NZ‏‎ (4 revisions)
  46. Spain.62‏‎ (4 revisions)
  47. Ireland.81‏‎ (4 revisions)
  48. Morocco.99‏‎ (4 revisions)
  49. South Africa.19‏‎ (4 revisions)
  50. Requirement of specialized skills can discourage some potential users‏‎ (4 revisions)

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)