From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
| Has DSS development stage
|
Use +
|
| Has actor perspective
|
Researcher +
|
| Has consequences
|
Ability to deal with ordinal preferences of decision makers and ordinal evaluation data on alternatives, comprehensive and easy to interpret, making the decision support process transparent and quick to implement even with large groups of people. +
|
| Has country
|
Finland +
|
| Has decision making dimension
|
More than one decision maker/stakeholder +
|
| Has domain
|
User interface and outputs +
|
| Has evidence
|
(See review article) +
|
| Has goods and services dimension
|
Market non-wood products +
, Market services +
, Market wood products +
, Non-market services +
|
| Has objectives dimension
|
Multiple objectives +
|
| Has recommendation for action
|
The implementation of the DSS needs to take into account the ability of participants to understand the DSS and its output. +
|
| Has reference
|
Kangas, A., Laukkanen, S., Kangas, J., 2006. Social choice theory and its applications in sustainable forest management—a review. Forest Policy and Economics 9, 77– 92. +
|
| Has researcher role
|
Decision analyst +
|
| Has spatial context
|
Non spatial +
, Spatial with neighbourhood interrelations +
, Spatial with no neighbourhood interrelations +
|
| Has spatial scale
|
Forest level +
, Regional/national level +
, Stand level +
|
| Has statement
|
Voting approaches can successfully be applied to participatory planning of forestry +
|
| Has temporal scale
|
Long term (strategic) +
, Medium term (tactical) +
, Short term (operational) +
|
| Has queryThis property is a special property in this wiki.
|
Voting approaches can successfully be applied to participatory planning of forestry +
|
| Categories |
Lesson +
|
| Modification dateThis property is a special property in this wiki.
|
30 July 2013 05:06:29 +
|
| | No properties link to this page. |
|---|
