ID 20
From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
A list of all pages that have property "ID" with value "20".
Since there have been only a few results, also nearby values are displayed.
- Lack of proper documentation and support services (manual, website, etc) can severely limit the + (11)
- The choice to develop the system in an Excel environment was based on the status of computer + (12)
- Plan the system architecture based on a broad view of future possibilities + (13)
- The scope of the modeling project can change significantly during the project + (14)
- The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more + (15)
- Users preferred enhanced functionality rather than useability + (16)
- Enlarged decision space + (17)
- It is necessary to know which data will be use as variables in the models before designing the DSS + (18)
- Provide missing help-documentation service + (19)
- The definition of standardized and specific criteria for selecting and zoning forest compartment + (20)
- An optimisation module comparing alternative scenarios based on multi-criteria analysis should be + (21)
- A financial analysis is an important component in the discussion about the preferences of different + (22)
- DSS can help in varying the treatment according to more than one forest function + (23)
- Embedding a DSS in a GIS software allows obtaining information at different spatial scales using the + (24)
- To compare the current and the past quantitative-qualitative parameters of the forest, great effort + (25)
- The fact that ProgettoBosco is conceived according to the criteria and indicators of sustainable + (26)
- Afforestion and deforestation options should be included in the management options + (27)
- It should be possible to specify the rotation time of a species not only by age but also by target + (28)
- Neighbourhood interrelations should be included in the generator + (29)
- Provide a simple version of the DSS, which new users can try out and learn quickly + (30)
