Difference between revisions of "Property:Has recommendation for action"
From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
Semantic.bot (Talk | contribs) (Definition of property from the WG1 property sheet) |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 15:06, 2 April 2013
This is a property of type Text.
Recommendations for actions
Pages using the property "Has recommendation for action"
Showing 25 pages using this property.
(previous 25) (next 25)A | |
|---|---|
| Actor Network Theory provides a suitable lens for exploring both technical and human aspects of DSS institutionalization in the forestry domain + | Consider both human and technology actors at the same level and follow their associations. Describe traces left by group formation. + |
B | |
| Biomasfor allows to obtain information at different spatial scale + | Decide the appropriate scale and use it. + |
E | |
| Enabling the analyses of several ecosystem services + | Just do it + |
| End user engagement throughout the development and deployment cycle is very important + | kick off meeting and periodical meetings with end user representatives, during the key stages of development + |
| Enlarge the decision space by generating a large set of potential management alternatives + | Use an automated prescription writter within a DSS. This is a useful tool in that allows enlarging the decision space by generating a large set of potential management alternatives. It also allows computing the impact of these management alternatives on forest productivity. + |
| Enlarged decision space + | Use a DSS to generate an appropriate size of the set of potential management alternatives to ensure that a preferred alternative is included among the potential ones. + |
I | |
| Interpretative case studies can help reduce the gap between research and practice + | Develop interpretative case studies during the different stages of the process (e.g. design, adoption, use). + |
| It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development + | Ask actor categories to choose their representatives to participate in some early stage meetings and to test the first prototypes of the DSS. + |
M | |
| Metodology and results are transparent and easy-to-share to non-expert stakeholders + | Explaining Biomasfor rationale and how it runs in GRASS GIS. + |
| Modular approach helpful in assisting industry uptake + | to be completed + |
N | |
| Need of flexibilization of analytical tools - no overdesigned tool that provides too much features for the use + | Development of a 'light' version of the DSS, which could be used in 'simple' cases, with the option of users migrating to the detailed version as forest management problems become more complex in a maturing forest estate. + |
P | |
| Pareto Frontier Techniques are useful for multi-criteria forest management planning + | Methods to generate and visualize Pareto frontiers should be incorporated in DSS to provide more information to DMs to select a best compromise management plan. + |
| Projection of stand development increases knowledge base + | Us a DSS to show outcomes of a set of potential management alternatives and the outcome of the alternative proposed by the DSS based on objectives stated by the user + |
| Provide a simple version of the DSS, which new users can try out and learn quickly + | Development of a 'light' version of the DSS, which could be used in 'simple' cases, with the option of users migrating to the detailed version as forest management problems become more complex in a maturing forest estate. + |
| Provide missing help-documentation service + | Provide system and help and documentation either fully integrated in the DSS or accessible via the web + |
R | |
| Regular ongoing engagement helped maintain interest of users + | Via Users Group and communities, specialized social networks ecc... + |
| Requirement of specialized skills can discourage some potential users + | Be confident with GRASS GIS before to start to use Biomasfor. Provide a piece of documentation at least for the necessary GRASS commands and tools. + |
S | |
| Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions + | The different scenarios were presented to the stakeholders in a series of public meetings. + |
T | |
| The DSS gave the forest manager the opportunity to experiment how their emphasis towards certain + | Involve the forest manager in creating scenarios for the DSS + |
| The ProgettoBosco working methodology, based on cooperation, successive approximations and + | Use a bottom up approach + |
| The activation of an iterative process through periodical meetings permitted to all the stakeholders + | Develop an iterative process and plan periodical meetings + |
| The adoption of the collaborative learning method made possible to gradually select the conceptual + | Develop a collaborative DSS + |
| The analysis of the actor network interactions allowed to identify the criticalities to be solved in order to develop the collaborative process + | It is important to use an actor network analysis not at the end of a process of institutionalization but during to gain focus. + |
| The definition of standardized and specific criteria for selecting and zoning forest compartment + | Define standards for selecting and zoning forest compartment units + |
| The development of large and enduring systems requires a long term approach + | Since the beginning, provide adequate financing also for maintanance, and a stable multidisciplinary staff + |
