Browse wiki
From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
An iterative process of presenting results to subject matter experts enabled them to better +
, Analysis at the landscape level allowed the integration of concerns about multiple resources as well +
, DSS allowed to explain better some technical concepts to non-professional stakeholders +
, DSS helped document and apply decision criteria consistently, and therefore produced a more +
, Despite the widely use and acceptance of the DSS there was still a lack of expertise to +
, From a management perspective, to avoid the complication of testing something new, the models used +
, It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development +
, Lack of proper documentation and support services (manual, website, etc) can severely limit the +
, Model building was rapid, it was assembling the data that took by far the most time +
, Need of a moderator function +
, Requirement of specialized skills can discourage some potential users +
, Running the DSS required special skills, therefore the local planning team required considerable +
, SIPAFIT can act sometimes as a referee to settle arguments among experts, users and stakeholders +
, SIPAFIT sub-systems have been useful in training activities, and can be very useful to explain and +
, Spatial variation between regions led to the development of different regional models, which led to +
, Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions +
, The DSS usage enabled the planning team to measure the achievement of the restoration goals +
, The activation of an iterative process through periodical meetings permitted to all the stakeholders +
, The scope of the modeling project can change significantly during the project +
, The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be +
… |
Has actor perspective
|