Browse wiki
From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
| | This page has no properties. |
|---|
|
To meet the needs of customer - the Forest Service - and to obtain satisfying results the +
|
Wg1
|
|
An iterative process of presenting results to subject matter experts enabled them to better +
, DSS allowed to explain better some technical concepts to non-professional stakeholders +
, End user engagement throughout the development and deployment cycle is very important +
, Interpretative case studies can help reduce the gap between research and practice +
, Provide missing help-documentation service +
, Regular ongoing engagement helped maintain interest of users +
, Requirement of specialized skills can discourage some potential users +
, Running the DSS required special skills, therefore the local planning team required considerable +
, SIPAFIT can act sometimes as a referee to settle arguments among experts, users and stakeholders +
, SIPAFIT sub-systems have been useful in training activities, and can be very useful to explain and +
, Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions +
, The DSS models built must match the knowledge of the local forest managers, so the ability for local +
, The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be +
, The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more +
, The use of the DSS improved communication among the planning team by providing a framework of the +
, Use of the DSS has been considered successful by the participating organizations, even though it has +
, Visualization of the preliminary actor network made the people explicity include the DSS in a planning process +
|
Wg3
|
