Difference between revisions of "Property:Has consequences"
From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
Semantic.bot (Talk | contribs) (Definition of property from the WG1 property sheet) |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 15:06, 2 April 2013
This is a property of type Text.
How is this statement justified in terms of consequences to be expected
Pages using the property "Has consequences"
Showing 25 pages using this property.
(previous 25) (next 25)A | |
|---|---|
| Actor Network Theory provides a suitable lens for exploring both technical and human aspects of DSS institutionalization in the forestry domain + | Other existing approaches do not look behind the actors and why they do the things they do, contrary to Actor Network Theory they do not "trace" and thus they miss important connections. + |
B | |
| Biomasfor allows to obtain information at different spatial scale + | Flexibility in the spatial scale used in Biomassfor allows to use it in wide range of conditions. + |
D | |
| DSS allowed to explain better some technical concepts to non-professional stakeholders + | In this way mitigating conflicts among stakeholders. + |
E | |
| Enabling the analyses of several ecosystem services + | is fruitful but demanding task + |
| End user engagement throughout the development and deployment cycle is very important + | it can be improved both the content of the DSS (data processing capability) and its usability (ie GUI...) + |
| Enlarge the decision space by generating a large set of potential management alternatives + | In order to cope with objetives and constraints set by the decision maker, some non-optimal management alternatives (at stand level) may be selected (at forest/landscape level) in a decision process + |
| Enlarged decision space + | Non-preferred management alternatives may be selected in a decision process + |
F | |
| Forest managers have to analyze how their forest management interventions effect the landscape + | Forest managers have to analyze how their forest management interventions effect the landscape level, to prevent the landscape from becoming dysfunctional + |
G | |
| Growth and Yield models are a key component of forest DSS + | The inclusion of growth and yield models in DSS allow showing outcomes of large sets of potential management alternatives which in fact enlarges the decision space and helps DM to develop better management plans. + |
I | |
| Interpretative case studies can help reduce the gap between research and practice + | The case study can provide useful guidelines for contemporary practice. + |
| It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development + | End users can suggest DSS contents and features closer to their needs. Moreover, their involvement may result in a higher acceptance and usage of the system. + |
M | |
| Metodology and results are transparent and easy-to-share to non-expert stakeholders + | Stakeholders may easily understand the applied methodology and understand and interpret the results. + |
| Modular approach helpful in assisting industry uptake + | to be completed + |
N | |
| Need of flexibilization of analytical tools - no overdesigned tool that provides too much features for the use + | It assures that a plan obtains a preliminary step on certification process + |
P | |
| Pareto Frontier Techniques are useful for multi-criteria forest management planning + | Generating and visualizing the complete set of efficient (i.e., Pareto optimal) solutions to forest planning problems help the DMs to acquire a holistic view of the planning problem and provide them with more information to select a best compromise management plan. + |
| Projection of stand development increases knowledge base + | Users may be unaware of true preferred alternatives + |
| Provide missing help-documentation service + | Lack of help and documentation in preferred form hampers use of DSS + |
R | |
| Regular ongoing engagement helped maintain interest of users + | to be completed + |
| Requirement of specialized skills can discourage some potential users + | Users that are not familiar whit GRASS GIS may may be discouraged to use Biomasfor. + |
S | |
| Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions + | Each stakeholder can accept that his own point of view is not always the best. + |
T | |
| The DSS gave the forest manager the opportunity to experiment how their emphasis towards certain + | Forest managers often do not have the time or resources to conduct real-world experiments + |
| The ProgettoBosco working methodology, based on cooperation, successive approximations and + | It allows to encompass a broad range of forest standings of the country and to produce a technician-ready-to-use DSS + |
| The activation of an iterative process through periodical meetings permitted to all the stakeholders + | It allows all the stakeholders to contribute to the definition of a series of common elements related to a certain subject + |
| The adoption of the collaborative learning method made possible to gradually select the conceptual + | It allowed to identify the conceptual common elements + |
| The analysis of the actor network interactions allowed to identify the criticalities to be solved in order to develop the collaborative process + | The consequences are that the development process became more efficient by focusing attention to critical actors. + |
