Oldest pages

From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
Jump to: navigation, search

Showing below up to 50 results starting with #1,901.

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

  1. Case-Lessons by WG themes matrix‏‎ (17:32, 11 September 2013)
  2. Multiple DSS are often needed to meet complex needs‏‎ (09:51, 13 September 2013)
  3. Need for new models for the later use of a tool‏‎ (20:36, 15 September 2013)
  4. The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more‏‎ (11:33, 16 September 2013)
  5. The scope of the modeling project can change significantly during the project‏‎ (09:35, 17 September 2013)
  6. Users preferred enhanced functionality rather than useability‏‎ (09:39, 17 September 2013)
  7. Enlarged decision space‏‎ (09:44, 17 September 2013)
  8. It is necessary to know which data will be use as variables in the models before designing the DSS‏‎ (09:49, 17 September 2013)
  9. To meet the needs of customer - the Forest Service - and to obtain satisfying results the‏‎ (09:55, 17 September 2013)
  10. The DSS models built must match the knowledge of the local forest managers, so the ability for local‏‎ (09:57, 17 September 2013)
  11. Requirement of specialized skills can discourage some potential users‏‎ (10:03, 17 September 2013)
  12. Model building was rapid, it was assembling the data that took by far the most time‏‎ (10:06, 17 September 2013)
  13. Regular ongoing engagement helped maintain interest of users‏‎ (10:07, 17 September 2013)
  14. Despite the widely use and acceptance of the DSS there was still a lack of expertise to‏‎ (10:33, 17 September 2013)
  15. Projection of stand development increases knowledge base‏‎ (10:37, 17 September 2013)
  16. Analysis at the landscape level allowed the integration of concerns about multiple resources as well‏‎ (10:40, 17 September 2013)
  17. Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions‏‎ (11:05, 17 September 2013)
  18. The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be‏‎ (11:15, 17 September 2013)
  19. Running the DSS required special skills, therefore the local planning team required considerable‏‎ (11:21, 17 September 2013)
  20. The DSS gave the forest manager the opportunity to experiment how their emphasis towards certain‏‎ (11:27, 17 September 2013)
  21. DSS allowed to explain better some technical concepts to non-professional stakeholders‏‎ (11:31, 17 September 2013)
  22. Visualization of the preliminary actor network made the people explicity include the DSS in a planning process‏‎ (11:42, 17 September 2013)
  23. Use of the DSS has been considered successful by the participating organizations, even though it has‏‎ (11:43, 17 September 2013)
  24. Case-Lessons with WG2 subthemes‏‎ (19:18, 17 September 2013)
  25. The definition of standardized and specific criteria for selecting and zoning forest compartment‏‎ (19:19, 17 September 2013)
  26. DSS can help in varying the treatment according to more than one forest function‏‎ (19:20, 17 September 2013)
  27. To compare the current and the past quantitative-qualitative parameters of the forest, great effort‏‎ (19:22, 17 September 2013)
  28. The fact that ProgettoBosco is conceived according to the criteria and indicators of sustainable‏‎ (19:22, 17 September 2013)
  29. From a management perspective, to avoid the complication of testing something new, the models used‏‎ (19:23, 17 September 2013)
  30. Need of flexibilization of analytical tools - no overdesigned tool that provides too much features for the use‏‎ (19:24, 17 September 2013)
  31. Forest managers have to analyze how their forest management interventions effect the landscape‏‎ (19:25, 17 September 2013)
  32. Case Studies Analysis‏‎ (20:11, 17 September 2013)
  33. Case-Lessons with WG1 subthemes‏‎ (20:13, 17 September 2013)
  34. Case-Lessons with WG3 subthemes‏‎ (20:14, 17 September 2013)
  35. Case-Lessons with WG4 subthemes‏‎ (20:15, 17 September 2013)
  36. Wiki Semantic structure - DSS descriptions Workplan2013‏‎ (12:13, 20 September 2013)
  37. DSS architecture and design Workplan 2013‏‎ (12:52, 20 September 2013)
  38. Lessons Group Workplan 2013‏‎ (15:33, 20 September 2013)
  39. It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development‏‎ (21:24, 22 September 2013)
  40. The adoption of the collaborative learning method made possible to gradually select the conceptual‏‎ (21:28, 22 September 2013)
  41. The tracing of the current actor network interactions made the group realize that they need a different kind of stakeholders from what they previously thought‏‎ (21:31, 22 September 2013)
  42. The analysis of the actor network interactions allowed to identify the criticalities to be solved in order to develop the collaborative process‏‎ (22:06, 22 September 2013)
  43. End user engagement throughout the development and deployment cycle is very important‏‎ (22:11, 22 September 2013)
  44. Using Actor Network Theory in the design stage can help in understanding the dynamism of the network‏‎ (06:13, 23 September 2013)
  45. SIPAFIT can act sometimes as a referee to settle arguments among experts, users and stakeholders‏‎ (06:18, 23 September 2013)
  46. Knowledge management and participatory processes Workplan 2013‏‎ (10:28, 23 September 2013)
  47. Monsu‏‎ (09:12, 9 October 2013)
  48. MONSU.Bilberry‏‎ (14:30, 10 October 2013)
  49. MONSU.Cowberry‏‎ (14:37, 10 October 2013)
  50. MONSU.Mushrooms‏‎ (14:39, 10 October 2013)

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)