Oldest pages
From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
Showing below up to 50 results starting with #1,901.
View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
- Case-Lessons by WG themes matrix (17:32, 11 September 2013)
- Multiple DSS are often needed to meet complex needs (09:51, 13 September 2013)
- Need for new models for the later use of a tool (20:36, 15 September 2013)
- The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more (11:33, 16 September 2013)
- The scope of the modeling project can change significantly during the project (09:35, 17 September 2013)
- Users preferred enhanced functionality rather than useability (09:39, 17 September 2013)
- Enlarged decision space (09:44, 17 September 2013)
- It is necessary to know which data will be use as variables in the models before designing the DSS (09:49, 17 September 2013)
- To meet the needs of customer - the Forest Service - and to obtain satisfying results the (09:55, 17 September 2013)
- The DSS models built must match the knowledge of the local forest managers, so the ability for local (09:57, 17 September 2013)
- Requirement of specialized skills can discourage some potential users (10:03, 17 September 2013)
- Model building was rapid, it was assembling the data that took by far the most time (10:06, 17 September 2013)
- Regular ongoing engagement helped maintain interest of users (10:07, 17 September 2013)
- Despite the widely use and acceptance of the DSS there was still a lack of expertise to (10:33, 17 September 2013)
- Projection of stand development increases knowledge base (10:37, 17 September 2013)
- Analysis at the landscape level allowed the integration of concerns about multiple resources as well (10:40, 17 September 2013)
- Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions (11:05, 17 September 2013)
- The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be (11:15, 17 September 2013)
- Running the DSS required special skills, therefore the local planning team required considerable (11:21, 17 September 2013)
- The DSS gave the forest manager the opportunity to experiment how their emphasis towards certain (11:27, 17 September 2013)
- DSS allowed to explain better some technical concepts to non-professional stakeholders (11:31, 17 September 2013)
- Visualization of the preliminary actor network made the people explicity include the DSS in a planning process (11:42, 17 September 2013)
- Use of the DSS has been considered successful by the participating organizations, even though it has (11:43, 17 September 2013)
- Case-Lessons with WG2 subthemes (19:18, 17 September 2013)
- The definition of standardized and specific criteria for selecting and zoning forest compartment (19:19, 17 September 2013)
- DSS can help in varying the treatment according to more than one forest function (19:20, 17 September 2013)
- To compare the current and the past quantitative-qualitative parameters of the forest, great effort (19:22, 17 September 2013)
- The fact that ProgettoBosco is conceived according to the criteria and indicators of sustainable (19:22, 17 September 2013)
- From a management perspective, to avoid the complication of testing something new, the models used (19:23, 17 September 2013)
- Need of flexibilization of analytical tools - no overdesigned tool that provides too much features for the use (19:24, 17 September 2013)
- Forest managers have to analyze how their forest management interventions effect the landscape (19:25, 17 September 2013)
- Case Studies Analysis (20:11, 17 September 2013)
- Case-Lessons with WG1 subthemes (20:13, 17 September 2013)
- Case-Lessons with WG3 subthemes (20:14, 17 September 2013)
- Case-Lessons with WG4 subthemes (20:15, 17 September 2013)
- Wiki Semantic structure - DSS descriptions Workplan2013 (12:13, 20 September 2013)
- DSS architecture and design Workplan 2013 (12:52, 20 September 2013)
- Lessons Group Workplan 2013 (15:33, 20 September 2013)
- It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development (21:24, 22 September 2013)
- The adoption of the collaborative learning method made possible to gradually select the conceptual (21:28, 22 September 2013)
- The tracing of the current actor network interactions made the group realize that they need a different kind of stakeholders from what they previously thought (21:31, 22 September 2013)
- The analysis of the actor network interactions allowed to identify the criticalities to be solved in order to develop the collaborative process (22:06, 22 September 2013)
- End user engagement throughout the development and deployment cycle is very important (22:11, 22 September 2013)
- Using Actor Network Theory in the design stage can help in understanding the dynamism of the network (06:13, 23 September 2013)
- SIPAFIT can act sometimes as a referee to settle arguments among experts, users and stakeholders (06:18, 23 September 2013)
- Knowledge management and participatory processes Workplan 2013 (10:28, 23 September 2013)
- Monsu (09:12, 9 October 2013)
- MONSU.Bilberry (14:30, 10 October 2013)
- MONSU.Cowberry (14:37, 10 October 2013)
- MONSU.Mushrooms (14:39, 10 October 2013)